· Private foundation
Kahn Foundation Co Kahn Lucas Lancaster
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC | $33,713 |
| NORTH WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $16,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACIES | $15,000 |
| HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| NEIGHBORS LINK | $2,500 |
| THE WESTON THEATER COMPANY | $2,500 |
| CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL | $2,000 |
| NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN | $1,500 |
| HACKLEY SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| UCLA JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE | $1,000 |
| THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $500 |
| MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE | $500 |
| CYCLE KIDS | $500 |
| SEARCH FOR CHANGE | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $122k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
31 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC8× · 2018–2025 · $141k · revenue +197%
- TMTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL3× · 2017–2019 · $120k · revenue +64%
- JMJupiter Medical Center Inc5× · 2017–2022 · $60k · revenue +93%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $3k
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMone grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
- FOFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENCE FORCESone grant, 2023 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…
Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.
The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Search for Change Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lamplighters Yeshivah. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds ADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds DELIVERING GOOD INC ↗
- Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE WESTON PLAYHOUSE THEATER ↗
- Who funds MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH RENEWAL FUND ↗
- Who funds EB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc ↗
- Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
- Who funds MyClinic Inc dba HealthyMe ↗
- Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HACKLEY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
- Who funds Jewish Adoption and Foster Care Options Inc ↗
- Who funds CYCLE KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORS LINK CORP ↗
- Who funds CAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PLACE OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds THE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION) ↗
- Who funds LAMPLIGHTERS YESHIVAH ↗
- Who funds White Plains Hospital Medical Center ↗
- Who funds THE RENDELL CENTER FOR CIVICS AND CIVIC ENGAGEMENT ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
- Who funds Cystic Fibrosis Research Fund Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Linville Family Foundation · American Express Foundation · The Vermont Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kahn Foundation Co Kahn Lucas Lancaster funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc — 12% of income from government
- Vermont Symphony Orchestra Association Inc — 11% of income from government
- Florida Sheriffs Association Inc — 4% of income from government
- Jupiter Medical Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Weston Playhouse Theater — 0% of income from government
- Place of Hope Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Kahn Foundation Co Kahn Lucas Lancaster?
Find your warmest path to Kahn Foundation Co Kahn Lucas Lancaster through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.