Skip to content
Kadlec Regional Medical Center at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Kadlec Regional Medical Center

The mission of KADLEC REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER is to provide quality health care to every patient we serve.

$108k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$46k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$4.6MEducation$2.5MReligion$60kHuman Services$47kCommunity Improvement$41kRecreation & Sports$36kFood & Nutrition$32kHousing & Shelter$22k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$40,840
Median grant
1
States reached
$904M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRACE CLINIC$45,833
TRI-CITIES CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION$40,840
WASHINGTON POISON CENTER$21,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $113k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%TRI-CITY UNION GOSPEL MISSION: $60k → 11%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF BENTON AND FRANKLIN COUNTIES: $20k → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS-SR LIFE RESOURCES NW: $13k → 11%TRI-CITIES CHAPLAINCY: $6k → 11%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF BENTON AND FRANKLIN COUNTIES: $8k → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS-SR LIFE RESOURCES NW: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.1M · 12 repeat orgs$168k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
8

Total granted

$7.1M
$147k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+11%

Still filing today

92%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    COLUMBIA BASIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $2.5M · revenue +49% · 37% of their budget
  • GC
    GRACE CLINIC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $283k · revenue +45%
  • BF
    BENTON FRANKLIN FAIR ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2017–2023 · $36k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • TC
    TRI CITY UNION GOSPEL MISSIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $60k · revenue +76%
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT de PAUL ST PATRICK CONFERENCEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +182%
  • ZP
    ZERO PROSTATE CANCER
    one grant, 2023 · $23k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
2
Healthpoint

Healthpoint strengthens communities and improves people's health by delivering quality services, breaking down barriers and providing access to all.

Health
3
Western Healthconnect

Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.

Health
4
Kadlec Regional Medical Center

The mission of kadlec regional medical center is to provide quality health care to every patient we serve.

Health
5
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
6
Kadlec Foundation

Support kadlec regional medical center in richland, wa. by enhancing its ability to meet emerging healthcare needs in the surrounding community.

Health
7
Washington Physicians Health Program

Wphp is washington's trusted resource for restoring the health of medical professionals. our confidential support and exceptional outcomes provide reassurance of safe practice and promote workforce sustainability.

Health
8
Tmc Healthcare

Our mission is to provide exceptional health care with compassion.

Health
9
Trinity Continuing Care Services

We, trinity senior living communities and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.trinity continuing care services (d/b/a trinity health senior…

Health
10
Tmc Health Foundation

The tmc health foundation supports the charitable mission of tucson medical center and is dedicated to improving the health and quality of life in our community.

Health
11
Saint Alphonsus Medical Center - Baker City Inc

We, saint alphonsus health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.saint alphonsus medical center-baker city is a member of saint…

Health
12
Uncompahgre Combined Clinics

To provide quality, cost-effective, accessible, and affordable healthcare to the community.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tri-Cities Cancer Center; the most unlike its peers is Grace Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KADLEC FOUNDATION: $3,287,426 · HealthKADLEC FOUNDATIONTRI-CITIES CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $785,827 · HealthTRI-CITIES CANCER CENTER FOUNDATIONGRACE CLINIC: $283,325 · HealthGRACE CLINIC+2 more: $44,589 · HealthCOLUMBIA BASIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,500,000 · EducationCOLUMBIA BASIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION+2 more: $22,788 · EducationBENTON FRANKLIN COMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE: $112,989 · OtherTRI-CITIES CANCER CENTER: $20,000 · OtherTRI-CITY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $10,580 · OtherFIELDS OF GRACE: $7,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC TRI-COUNTY PARTNERS: $6,130 · OtherTRI CITY UNION GOSPEL MISSION: $60,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF BENTON & FRANKLIN COUNTIES: $28,000 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT de PAUL ST PATRICK CONFERENCE: $25,000 · Human ServicesSENIOR LIFE RESOURCES NORTHWEST: $19,238 · Human ServicesTri-Cities Chaplaincy: $6,000 · Human ServicesBENTON FRANKLIN FAIR ASSOCIATION: $35,614 · Recreation & SportsTRI-CITY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMER: $30,750 · Community ImprovementELIJAH FAMILY HOMES: $16,000 · Housing & Shelter
Health$4,401,167Education$2,522,788Other$156,699Human Services$138,238Recreation & Sports$35,614Community Improvement$30,750Housing & Shelter$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKADLEC FOUNDATION: $3,287,426 over 3y, 28% of budgetCOLUMBIA BASIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,500,000 over 5y, 37% of budgetTRI-CITIES CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $785,827 over 3y, 52% of budgetGRACE CLINIC: $283,325 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetBENTON FRANKLIN COMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE: $112,989 over 6y, 26% of budgetTRI CITY UNION GOSPEL MISSION: $60,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBENTON FRANKLIN FAIR ASSOCIATION: $35,614 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTRI-CITY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMER: $30,750 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF BENTON & FRANKLIN COUNTIES: $28,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT de PAUL ST PATRICK CONFERENCE: $25,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetZERO PROSTATE CANCER: $23,089 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWASHINGTON POISON CENTER: $21,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTRI-CITIES CANCER CENTER: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSENIOR LIFE RESOURCES NORTHWEST: $19,238 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetELIJAH FAMILY HOMES: $16,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: $13,588 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTRI-CITY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $10,580 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC TRI-COUNTY PARTNERS: $6,130 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTri-Cities Chaplaincy: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Benton …Lamb Weston Charitabl…3 Rivers Community Fo…Columbus FoundationWomen Helping Women F…Hazel Hodgson Charita…Greater Columbia Acco…Thrivent Charitable I…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
United Way of Benton & Franklin CountiesWA28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Benton & Franklin Counties · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · 3 Rivers Community Foundation · Columbus Foundation · Women Helping Women Fund Tri-Cities · Hazel Hodgson Charitable Foundation · Greater Columbia Accountable Community of Health · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kadlec Regional Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kadlec Regional Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kadlec Regional Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home