Skip to content
Kadane Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Kadane Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$676k
Granted FY2021
5
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Health$605kPhilanthropy$528kArts & Culture$166kHuman Services$132kFood & Nutrition$65kAnimals$62kYouth Development$55kEducation$37kOther$0
02FY2021 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $271k
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$121,250
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS$400,000
HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS$150,000
UNITED REGIONAL FOUNDATION$121,250
HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS$5,000
UNITED REGIONAL FOUNDATION$226
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $639k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE KITCHEN: $27k → 16%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $400k → 16%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $150k → 16%PRESBYTARIAN MANOR: $25k → 16%THE ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY: $25k → 16%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $8k → 16%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wichita Habitat for Humanity Inc

At wichita habitat for humanity, we believe everyone deserves the strength, stability, and independence that comes with a safe, affordable home. we partner with hardworking individuals and families in our community, empowering them to…

Housing & Shelter
2
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
3
Wichita County Community Foundation Inc

The wichita county community foundation is a nonprofit, non-sectarian organization dedicated to preserving local wealth so the communities in and around leoti and wichita county will forever remain attractive places to live, work and raise…

Community Improvement
4
Wichita Falls Faith Mission Inc

To provide christ-centered programs and services that lead the homeless toward self-sufficiency.

Religion
5
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
6
Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation

The mission of the Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation is to enhance the quality of life in the Wichita Falls area through the promotion and support of charitable giving. Our vision is to build strong, vibrant communities inspired by…

Philanthropy
7
Western Kansas Community Foundation

Enriching western Kansas life through philanthropy, collaboration and leadership.

Philanthropy
8
Wild West Wildlife Rehabilitation Center

The organization is dedicated to rescuing, rehabilitating and releasing orphaned and injured wildlife in the texas panhandle.

Animals
9
Wichita County Heritage Society Dba Kell House Heritage Center

Inspire and educate the community to engage in preservation through the kell house heritage center.

Arts & Culture
10
Humane Society of Central Texas

As an advocate for the community goal of maintaining its no kill status, the humane society provides adoption, rescue and foster opportunities for the homeless animals at the city of waco animal shelter, as well as community education…

Animals
11
West Texas Hero Homes Inc

Support of special needs military or first responders and their families.

Housing & Shelter
12
Wichita Family Crisis Center

Formerly ywca wichita, the wichita family crisis center (wfcc) began operations in wichita, ks in 1907. wfcc's mission is to eliminate domestic violence in our community by supporting survivors through shelter, education & advocacy.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Senior Citizen Services of North Texas Inc Dba the Kitchen; the most unlike its peers is Wichita Falls University Kiwanis Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED REGIONAL FOUNDATION: $527,546 · OtherUNITED REGIONAL FOUNDATIONFAIN COLLEGE OF FINE ARTS: $60,000 · OtherFAIN COLLEGE OF FINE ARTSARTS COUNCIL OF WICHITA FALLS: $55,500 · OtherARTS COUNCIL OF WICHITA FALLS+20 more: $271,500 · Other+20 moreHospice of Wichita Falls Inc: $562,500 · Human ServicesHospice of Wichita Falls IncSENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC DBA THE KITCHEN: $26,500 · Human ServicesPresbyterian Manor Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesHUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY: $27,500 · AnimalsWild Bird Rescue Inc: $26,500 · AnimalsCLAY COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $5,000 · AnimalsWICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK: $26,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD FORWARD INC: $12,500 · Food & NutritionCLAY COUNTY OUTREACH INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionInclusion Matters by Shanes Inspiration: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsHOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsINHERITANCE ADOPTIONS: $27,500 · Crime & LegalWichita Falls Symphony Orchestra: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$914,546Human Services$639,000Animals$59,000Food & Nutrition$43,500Recreation & Sports$35,000Crime & Legal$27,500Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHospice of Wichita Falls Inc: $562,500 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY: $27,500 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetINHERITANCE ADOPTIONS: $27,500 over 1y, 11% of budgetProject Back to School: $27,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetWild Bird Rescue Inc: $26,500 over 1y, 30% of budgetSENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC DBA THE KITCHEN: $26,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK: $26,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPresbyterian Manor Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetFOOD FORWARD INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHANDS TO HANDS COMMUNITY FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRathgeber Hospitality House: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWichita West Volunteer Fire Dept: $7,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCAMP FIRE NORTH TEXAS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCLAY COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetCHRISTMAS IN ACTION: $3,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Fain FoundationBryant Edwards Founda…J S Bridwell Foundati…Wichita Falls Area Co…James N McCoy Foundat…The Priddy FoundationGuinn Foundation IncDonnell FoundationPerkins-Prothro Found…Leota Steed FoundationLibra FoundationWilliam F & Moonyeen …
The Fain FoundationTX41.2× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Fain Foundation · Bryant Edwards Foundation Inc · J S Bridwell Foundation · Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation · James N McCoy Foundation · The Priddy Foundation · Guinn Foundation Inc · Donnell Foundation · Perkins-Prothro Foundation · Leota Steed Foundation · Libra Foundation · William F & Moonyeen Reynolds Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kadane Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kadane Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kadane’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home