Skip to content
K5 Foundation co Pacific Foundation Services at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

K5 Foundation co Pacific Foundation Services

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$9.3MRecreation & Sports$3.7MHealth$1.1MYouth Development$50kCrime & Legal$30k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $250k+4 grants · $3.7M
$350,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$47M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Northwestern University$2,000,000
Board of trts Leland Stanford Unive$1,000,000
Town School for Boys$350,000
Sponsors For Educ Opportunities$350,000
Larkin Street Youth Services$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Larkin Street Youth Services: $25k → 10%Larkin Street Youth Services: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.2M · 8 repeat orgs$370k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$8.2M
$370k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+10%

Still filing today

63%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Northwestern University
    5× · 2020–2024 · $3.7M · revenue +33%
  • GROTON SCHOOL
    3× · 2020–2022 · $650k · revenue +32%
  • TS
    TOWN SCHOOL FOR BOYS
    4× · 2019–2024 · $558k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • KA
    KIPP Area Schools
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
  • KB
    KIPP BAY AREA SCHOOLSgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue +82%
  • AH
    AIM HIGH FOR HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
2
Marin Academy

Marin academy asks every individual to think, question, and create in an environment of encouragement and compassion, and challenges each person to accept the responsibilities posed by education in a democratic society.

Education
3
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

—
4
San Francisco University High School

At san franicisco university high school, we engage our community of diverse voices in a transformational experience that embraces the spirited pursuit of learning and empowers purpose larger than self.

Education
5
The Seattle Academy of Arts & Sciences

Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.

Education
6
The College Preparatory School

At college prep we believe in the foundational importance of scholarship, the value of dialogue, and the need for academically curious young people to belong to a kind, creative, diverse and joyful community. we challenge our students to…

Education
7
Presidio Hill School

Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…

Education
8
The Seven Hills School

The institution provides educational instruction and activities to students ranging from preschool through 8th grade.

—
9
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
10
San Francisco Girls' School

To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.

—
11
Mark Day School

Innovative and full of heart, mark day school nurtures each child to pursue their curiosity, think critically, embrace challenge with courage and joy, and work in partnership with others to build more caring and inclusive communities.

—
12
Suffield Academy

Suffield Academy is a coeducational independent secondary school serving a diverse student body of day and boarding students from across the United States and from many foreign counties. The school is grounded in a tradition of academic…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kipp Bay Area Schools; the most unlike its peers is Larkin Street Youth Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $5,640,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNI…GROTON SCHOOL: $650,000 · EducationGROTON SCHOOLTOWN SCHOOL FOR BOYS: $557,500 · EducationTOWN SCHOOL FOR BOYS+6 more: $112,500 · EducationNorthwestern University: $3,725,000 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern UniversityBoard of trts Leland Stanford Unive: $2,015,000 · OtherBoard of trts Leland Stanfo…Sponsors For Educ Opportunities: $1,112,750 · OtherSponsors For Educ Opportuni…KIPP Area Schools: $250,000 · OtherKIPP Area Schools+3 more: $105,000 · OtherLarkin Street Youth Services: $50,000 · Human ServicesFriends of Alameda County CASA Inc: $5,000 · Crime & LegalCASA of San Mateo County: $5,000 · Crime & Legal
Education$6,960,000Recreation & Sports$3,725,000Other$3,482,750Human Services$50,000Crime & Legal$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $5,640,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $3,725,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGROTON SCHOOL: $650,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTOWN SCHOOL FOR BOYS: $557,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKIPP BAY AREA SCHOOLS: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HELIX SCHOOL: $32,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetAIM HIGH FOR HIGH SCHOOL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALDER GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of Alameda County CASA Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCASA of San Mateo County: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEAST PALO ALTO ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSan Francisco Achievers: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco Fou…Silicon Valley Commun…Robert and Dana Emery…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Marin Community Found…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
The San Francisco FoundationCA14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Robert and Dana Emery Family Foundation Rockefeller Trust Company · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Marin Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization K5 Foundation co Pacific Foundation Services funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from K5 Foundation co Pacific Foundation Services. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on K5 Foundation co Pacific Foundation Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home