· Private foundation
K2N2 Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k35 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $41k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CANOPY | $26,000 |
| SAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE | $15,000 |
| UC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY | $4,150 |
| LIVING CLASSROOM | $3,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| UC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| HOPES CORNER INC | $1,200 |
| MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| MENTOR TUTOR CONNECTION | $1,000 |
| INATURALIST | $1,000 |
| CHANNEL ISLANDS RESTORATION | $1,000 |
| PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST | $1,000 |
| YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY | $700 |
| FOUNDATION FOR A COLLEGE EDUCATION | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
59 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCanopy9× · 2017–2025 · $151k · revenue +190%
- STSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE2× · 2024–2025 · $26k · revenue +18%
- CSCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +131%
Funded once
- HFHonnold Foundationone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INCone grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue -54%- PRPine Ridge Associationgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +326%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.
California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.
Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.
California ocean science trust (ost) is a non-profit organization dedicated to accelerating progress towards a healthy and productive ocean future for california. created by state legislation, ost bridges the gap between cutting-edge…
The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.
To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Nit Trichy Usa Alumni Chapter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
109 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 109 of the 120 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Canopy ↗
- Who funds SAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC ↗
- Who funds EASTIE FARM INC ↗
- Who funds UC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIVING CLASSROOM ↗
- Who funds Hopes Corner Inc ↗
- Who funds LOS ALTOS MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY GIVING TREE ↗
- Who funds Bay Area Ridge Trail Council ↗
- Who funds Honnold Foundation ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MENTOR TUTOR CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
- Who funds VENTANA WILDERNESS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN VIEW HIGH SCHOOL BAND PARENTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MAITRI ↗
- Who funds YOSEMITE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KQED INC ↗
- Who funds Mountain View Educational Foundation ↗
- Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN VIEW CHAMBER OF COMMERCE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KHAN ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds Channel Islands Restoration ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF MUSIC AND ARTS ↗
- Who funds Save The Bay ↗
- Who funds MOVEMBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds SEMPERVIRENS FUND ↗
- Who funds COMMON ROOTS FARM ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF STEVENS CREEK TRAIL ↗
- Who funds CHAC FKA COMMUNITY HEALTH AWARENESS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Sewa International Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Patagoniaorg · The Los Altos Rotary Endowment Fund Inc · Embarcadero Media Foundation · Sutter Bay Medical Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · Tides Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization K2N2 Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Eastie Farm Inc — 13% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.