Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

California · Nonprofit

TOMAHAWKS LACROSSE

TOMAHAWKS LACROSSE (California) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $400 to it, the largest being K2N2 Family Foundation ($400). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$60k
Revenue FY2025
1
Funders on record
$400
Grants received
$33k
Net assets
1/1 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%

Against its field

TOMAHAWKS LACROSSE's funding has concentrated — grant income rose while the number of funders held roughly flat.

Operating margin−6% · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−3% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,005 recreation & sports nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($73k) Expenses 100 ($70k) Net assets 100 ($52k)2019 Revenue 88 ($64k) Expenses 99 ($69k) Net assets 91 ($47k)2020 Revenue 116 ($85k) Expenses 90 ($63k) Net assets 134 ($69k)2021 Revenue 46 ($34k) Expenses 59 ($41k) Net assets 119 ($62k)2022 Revenue 85 ($62k) Expenses 108 ($75k) Net assets 94 ($49k)2023 Revenue 68 ($50k) Expenses 107 ($75k) Net assets 94 ($49k)2024 Revenue 61 ($45k) Expenses 82 ($57k) Net assets 71 ($36k)2025 Revenue 82 ($60k) Expenses 92 ($64k) Net assets 64 ($33k)
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (82)Expenses (92)Net assets (64)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of TOMAHAWKS LACROSSE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (39% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 15,007 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$4k
18
$5k
19
$22k
20
$8k
21
$13k
22
$25k
23
$12k
24
$3k
25
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2022 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $100 → $150.

Funder
'22
'23
'24*
total
funders
1
1
1

From the IRS filings of TOMAHAWKS LACROSSE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

TOMAHAWKS LACROSSE draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 1 state in all.

DE

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

22
23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like TOMAHAWKS LACROSSE

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for TOMAHAWKS LACROSSE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds TOMAHAWKS LACROSSE?
TOMAHAWKS LACROSSE (California) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $400 to it, the largest being K2N2 Family Foundation ($400). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does TOMAHAWKS LACROSSE have?
IRS filings report 1 organization giving $400 in grants to TOMAHAWKS LACROSSE, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of TOMAHAWKS LACROSSE?
K2N2 Family Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $400 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like TOMAHAWKS LACROSSE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 1funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing