Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jyar Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Religion$110kInternational$63kArts & Culture$48kEmployment$7kEducation$6k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$89k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
U Channel foundation$10,000
River of Live Christian Church$7,250
ROLF River of Life Foundation$5,000
Silver Lining Missions$3,000
ROLA River of Life Christian Church$1,500
Rol-Acts Nonprofit Corp$1,500
Crystal Springs Uplands School$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Crystal Springs Uplands School: $3k → 7%River of Live Christian Church: $25k → 8%New York Tai-An Christian Church: $2k → 13%Doctors without Border: $2k → 17%Love Foundation US: $1k → 6%Crystal Springs Uplands School: $1k → 7%River of Live Christian Church: $17k → 8%New York Tai-An Christian Church: $2k → 13%Crystal Springs Uplands School: $1k → 7%River of Live Christian Church: $16k → 8%New York Tai-An Christian Church: $1k → 13%Crystal Springs Uplands School: $1k → 7%River of Live Christian Church: $14k → 8%New York Tai-An Christian Church: $1k → 13%ROLF River of Life Foundation: $12k → 8%ROLF River of Life Foundation: $12k → 8%River of Live Christian Church: $11k → 8%U Channel foundation: $10k → 8%River of Live Christian Church: $9k → 8%ROLF River of Life Foundation: $8k → 8%River of Live Christian Church: $7k → 8%U Channel foundation: $5k → 8%U Channel foundation: $5k → 8%ROLF River of Life Foundation: $5k → 8%U Channel foundation: $5k → 8%ROLF River of Life Foundation: $5k → 8%ROLF River of Life Foundation: $5k → 8%Double Portion Media: $4k → 8%Double Portion Media: $4k → 8%Double Portion Media: $3k → 8%River of Live Christian Church: $3k → 8%U Channel foundation: $3k → 8%Double Portion Media: $3k → 8%Rol-Acts Nonprofit Corp: $2k → 8%U Channel foundation: $2k → 8%ROLF River of Life Foundation: $2k → 8%Double Portion Media: $2k → 8%Rol-Acts Nonprofit Corp: $2k → 8%ROLA River of Life Christian Church: $2k → 8%Double Portion Media: $2k → 8%Rol-Acts Nonprofit Corp: $1k → 8%Rol-Acts Nonprofit Corp: $1k → 8%Rol-Acts Nonprofit Corp: $1k → 8%ROLA River of Life Christian Church: $1k → 8%Silver Lining Missions: $4k → 8%Silver Lining Missions: $3k → 8%Silver Lining Missions: $1k → 8%Silver Lining Missions: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$229k · 10 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$229k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
-6%

Still filing today

50%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureInternationalPhilanthropyReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    SILVER LINING MISSIONS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +98%
  • RN
    ROL-ACTS NONPROFIT CORP
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +193%
  • CS
    CRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • TM
    THE MEDIA EVANGELISM ASSOCIATION USAgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +34%
  • LF
    LOVE FOUNDATION US INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue -89%
  • IH
    Integrating Hong Kong's Creation TV
    one grant, 2023 · $800

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Chinese High School in America

Operate school to teach Chinese language to students from kindergarten to 12th grade.

Arts & Culture
2
China Digital Times Inc

CDT is an independent, bilingual media organization that brings uncensored news and online voices from China to the world.

Arts & Culture
3
East Bay Chinese School

East Bay Chinese School's mission is to provide Chinese language and culture classes to educate our students in the appreciation of Chinese heritage, promote cross-cultural understanding and prepare them in becoming community leaders.

4
Sino Us Performing Arts Organization

Organization's mission is to promote the cultural understanding of chinese art, to foster the communication between chinese artists and american artists, and to provide art training and cooperation for chinese ethnic groups.

Arts & Culture
5
California University - Silicon Valley

Providing professional training of Chinese Medicine (TCM), including acupuncture, Chinese herbology, acupressure, Qigong and so on, granting the students Masters degree. Its a three to four years teaching program.

Education
6
United Chinese Americans

United Chinese Americans (UCA) is a nationwide nonprofit and nonpartisan federation and civic movement, inspired and dedicated to enriching and empowering Chinese American communities through civic engagement, political participation,…

7
Pacific East Quality Education

Ycis silicon valley is a welcoming school community where all children from preschool through grade 8 are encouraged to find and follow their gifts as they learn in both chinese and english. our goal:to help our students become…

Education
8
Unitedly

Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Human Services
9
Claremont Community School of Music

The mission of Claremont Community School of Music is to enrich the lives of individuals and the community through music; to provide outstanding instruction for amateur and aspiring professional musicians of all ages; to reach out to the…

Arts & Culture
10
Torrance Chinese School

Torrance Chinese School is a non-profit, non-religious and non-political educational institution which provides a friendly environment for students who are interested in learning the Chinese language. The school offers classes not only for…

Arts & Culture
11
Mandarin Academy

Teach K-5 grammar school, part time after school teaching, and summer school programs, focused on bilingual teaching in Mandarin Chinese and English.

Education
12
Global Academy Inc

The mission of clovis global academy is to sustain a safe, inclusive school ecology where our students achieve academic excellence and we incite a lifelong love of learning. we empower our students with productive skills and values so they…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Love Foundation Us Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rol-Acts Nonprofit Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RIVER OF LIFE CHRISTIAN CHURCH — $101,750 · OtherRIVER OF LIFE CHRISTIAN CHURCHROLF River of Life Foundation — $47,425 · OtherROLF River of Life FoundationNEW YORK TAI-AN CHRISTIAN CHURCH — $6,300 · Other+4 more — $5,800 · OtherU Channel Foundation — $30,000 · Arts & CultureU Channel FoundationDOUBLE PORTION MEDIA — $17,260 · Arts & CultureDOUBLE PORTION MEDIAROL-ACTS NONPROFIT CORP — $6,600 · EducationCRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL — $5,500 · EducationCARLMONT ACADEMIC FOUNDATION — $500 · EducationSILVER LINING MISSIONS — $10,040 · PhilanthropyTHE MEDIA EVANGELISM ASSOCIATION USA — $1,000 · ReligionLOVE FOUNDATION US INC — $1,000 · International
Other$161,275Arts & Culture$47,260Education$12,600Philanthropy$10,040Religion$1,000International$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetU Channel Foundation — $30,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetDOUBLE PORTION MEDIA — $17,260 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetSILVER LINING MISSIONS — $10,040 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetROL-ACTS NONPROFIT CORP — $6,600 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetCRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL — $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDIA EVANGELISM ASSOCIATION USA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLOVE FOUNDATION US INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOLDEN STATE YOUTH ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARLMONT ACADEMIC FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds U Channel Foundation
  • Who funds DOUBLE PORTION MEDIA
  • Who funds SILVER LINING MISSIONS
  • Who funds ROL-ACTS NONPROFIT CORP
  • Who funds CRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL
  • Who funds THE MEDIA EVANGELISM ASSOCIATION USA
  • Who funds LOVE FOUNDATION US INC
  • Who funds GOLDEN STATE YOUTH ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds CARLMONT ACADEMIC FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nissi FoundationCA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nissi Foundation · Shp Christian Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jyar Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jyar Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jyar Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph