Skip to content
Junior League of Collin County at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Junior League of Collin County

The Junior League of Collin County is an organization of women whose mission is to advance womens leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

$68k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$46kFood & Nutrition$40kHuman Services$25kCrime & Legal$18kHousing & Shelter$15kArts & Culture$8k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $30,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $67,796 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $37,796 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER$10,000
COMMUNITY GARDEN KITCHEN$10,000
CITY HOUSE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%CITY HOUSE: $10k → 5%STREETSIDE SHOWERS: $15k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
CityBridge Health Foundation

Free urgent care and health care clinical services to patients in Collin County Texas and the surrounding area.

Health
2
Homeless Coalition of Dallas

Provide food and clothing to homeless in Dallas and Carrolton area

Human Services
3
Community Council of Greater Dallas

The community council provides leadership in moving individuals and families from surviving to thriving. we improve quality of life by alleviating poverty, fostering independence and wellness and connecting people to the resources they…

Human Services
4
Washington Dc Meals on Wheels Inc

We deliver healthy delicious meals to our home-bound neighbors. With a vision of creating a more interconnected resilient and compassionate community our program supports entire family systems. In 2024 236 volunteers delivered 55,642 meals…

—
5
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
6
Crisis Assistance Center Inc dba Community Assistance Center

To provide emergency assistance to people in Montgomery County, TX who are in an unexpected crisis.

Human Services
7
Cancer Support Community North Texas

Cancer support community north texas is a non-profit organization that provides one of the most comprehensive, free of charge programs providing cancer support available in dallas, collin and tarrant counties.

Health
8
Meals On Wheels and More Inc

To nourish and enrich the lives of the homebound and other people in need through programs that promote dignity and independent living.

Food & Nutrition
9
Watershed Human and Community Development Agency Inc

Assisting in the growth and development of the College Station community in the areas of employment health care housing and counseling.

Community Improvement
10
Council on Aging Services for Seniors

To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.

—
11
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
12
Meals on Wheels Atlanta Inc

To support senior independence through meals, shelter, education, and community.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals On Wheels America; the most unlike its peers is Camp Ihope Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRACE TO GROW: $25,000 · HealthGRACE TO GROWCHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM OF TEXAS: $10,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM OF TE…BIND- Brain Injury Network of Dallas: $5,800 · HealthBIND- Brain Injury Network of …ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER COLLIN COUNTY: $10,000 · OtherASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GRE…ArtCentre of Plano Inc: $7,500 · OtherArtCentre of Plano IncFrisco Student Fastpacs: $5,000 · OtherFrisco Student FastpacsMaurice Barnett Geriatric Wellness Center Inc: $5,000 · OtherMaurice Barnett Geriatri…SANCHEZ CHARITIES: $5,000 · OtherSANCHEZ CHARITIESCOMMUNITY GARDEN KITCHEN OF COLLIN COUNTY INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY GARDEN KITCH…MEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA: $10,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS AMERIC…STREETSIDE SHOWERS INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesSTREETSIDE SHOWERS…CITY HOUSE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCITY HOUSE INCCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC: $18,000 · Civil RightsCHILDRENS ADV…CAMP IHOPE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Membership Benefit
Health$40,800Other$32,500Food & Nutrition$30,000Human Services$25,000Civil Rights$18,000Membership Benefit$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRACE TO GROW: $25,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY GARDEN KITCHEN OF COLLIN COUNTY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTREETSIDE SHOWERS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER COLLIN COUNTY: $10,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetArtCentre of Plano Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFrisco Student Fastpacs: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…Texas Instruments Fou…Coserv Charitable Fou…United Way of Metropo…McKesson Foundation I…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Charities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX27.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Coserv Charitable Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · McKesson Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Junior League of Collin County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Junior League of Collin County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Junior League of Collin County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home