· Public charity
Jumpstart for Young Children Inc
See schedule o:jumpstart envisions the day when every child in america enters kindergarten prepared to succeed.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
- $50k–250k31 grants · $3.4M
- $250k+3 grants · $887k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY | $344,166 |
| THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY | $275,040 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI COLUMBIA | $268,207 |
| PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY | $227,057 |
| CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO | $218,036 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON | $201,642 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES | $180,739 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT | $147,100 |
| HOWARD UNIVERSITY | $145,153 |
| ST MARY'S COLLEGE | $110,959 |
| TEMPLE UNIVERSITY | $107,362 |
| PACE UNIVERSITY | $105,775 |
| UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH | $105,316 |
| CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FULLERTON | $100,997 |
| PITZER COLLEGE | $100,811 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 77% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
46 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE8× · 2017–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +60%
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +109%
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH8× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +44%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF AR FT SMITH FOUNDATIONINCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $60k · revenue +103%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLANDone grant, 2019 · $14k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…
Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…
The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.
See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.
The university of denver (du) is a higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees - the mission of the university of denver is to promote learning by engaging with students (continued on schedule o)in…
As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University and the most unlike its peers is Seattle University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 73 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds The George Washington University ↗
- Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
- Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds PACE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SIMMONS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Pitzer College ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY DOMINGUEZ HILLS TORO AUXILIARY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CSU BAKERSFIELD AUXILIARY FOR SPONSORED PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds WHEELOCK COLLEGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · American Chemical Society · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · Folds of Honor Foundation · American Heart Association Inc · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · California Community Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jumpstart for Young Children Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Northeastern University — 4% of income from government
- Simmons University — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.