Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jumping Mouse Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$700k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$1.7MHealth$954kEducation$746kInternational$740kFood & Nutrition$625kRecreation & Sports$308kCrime & Legal$180kYouth Development$31kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $305k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $390k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$10.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IMPACT ON EDUCATION$100,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN$90,000
COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE$50,000
SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE$50,000
FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION$50,000
RAINN$50,000
IGNITE ADAPTIVE SPORTS$45,000
YMCA OF NORTHERN COLORADO$45,000
BLUE SKY BRIDGE$30,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AM$25,000
NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION I$25,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUN$25,000
USAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S$25,000
DENVER RESCUE MISSION$25,000
FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $220k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WARRIOR EXPEDITIONS: $25k → 8%SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $45k → 12%WARRIOR EXPEDITIONS: $25k → 8%SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $25k → 12%WARRIOR EXPEDITIONS: $25k → 8%ACCESS OPPORTUNITY: $5k → 12%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $40k → 12%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $10k → 12%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $10k → 12%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CT
CO
KY
VA
MD
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.1M · 22 repeat orgs$308k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
14

Total granted

$5.1M
$213k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+29%

Still filing today

77%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEnvironmentInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $740k · revenue +21%
  • IO
    IMPACT ON EDUCATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $625k · revenue +213%
  • FH
    FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $560k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • Y
    YMCA
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • KP
    KY PUBLIC PROTECTION CABINET
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • B
    BVKID
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
2
Center for Improving Value in Health Care

To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…

Health
3
Colorado Open Lands

Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.

Environment
4
Colorado Coalition Against Domestic Violence

Advancing the well-being of all coloradans through relationships free from abuse and oppression.

Human Services
5
A Shared Vision Partners in Pediatric Blindness and Visual Imp

A Shared Vision educates, inspires, and empowers families to nurture the development of their young children who are blind or visually impaired. We provide early intervention vision services in families' homes and community settings…

Health
6
Public Broadcasting of Colorado Inc

To deliver meaningful news, music, and cultural experiences to everyone in colorado using the power of the human voice in all its forms

Arts & Culture
7
Boulder Mountainbike Alliance

The Boulder Mountainbike Alliance exists to serve as a positive voice for mountain biking in the greater Boulder County, Colorado area by improving the trail experience for all users through social rides and events, advocacy, and trail…

Recreation & Sports
8
Colorado Cross Disability Coalition

To advocate for social justice for people with all types of disabilities.

—
9
Domestic Violence Initiative for Women With Disabilities

Empowering victims and creating a bridge to close the gap for people with disabilities through discovery of self-resiliency by providing support and services.

—
10
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
11
Boulder Bike Sharing

Promote health, quality of life and preservation of the environment in boulder, colorado by building and operating a comprehensive city-wide bike sharing

—
12
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation Boulder County; the most unlike its peers is Bvkid. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
21/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IMPACT ON EDUCATION INC: $625,000 · OtherIMPACT ON EDUCATION INCFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $560,000 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCSAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE: $410,000 · OtherSAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCEYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOULDER VALLEY: $305,000 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOULDER VALLE…YMCA: $100,000 · Other+20 more: $418,000 · Other+20 moreSave The Children Federation Inc: $740,000 · InternationalSave The Childr…COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $495,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOO…FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $130,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF …IGNITE ADAPTIVE SPORTS: $308,000 · Human ServicesIGNITE ADAPT…WARRIOR EXPEDITIONS: $75,000 · Human ServicesWARRIOR EXPE…DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $75,000 · Human ServicesDENVER RESCU…SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHOUSE DE…Via Mobility Services: $70,000 · Human ServicesVia Mobility…+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 · HealthNATIONAL …Rape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN): $174,000 · HealthRape Abus…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $25,000 · HealthPLANNED P…USAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S: $25,000 · HealthUSAGAINST…+2 more: $15,000 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN RIDING THERAPY: $400,000 · Recreation & SportsCHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM: $170,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$2,418,000International$740,000Food & Nutrition$625,000Human Services$603,000Health$439,000Recreation & Sports$400,000Crime & Legal$170,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $740,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT ON EDUCATION INC: $625,000 over 8y, 7.3% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $560,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $495,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN RIDING THERAPY: $400,000 over 7y, 38% of budgetIGNITE ADAPTIVE SPORTS: $308,000 over 8y, 9.8% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOULDER VALLEY: $305,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetRape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN): $174,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM: $170,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $130,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEYE TO EYE INC DBA THE NEURODIVERSITY ALLIANCE: $80,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetWARRIOR EXPEDITIONS: $75,000 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $70,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetVia Mobility Services: $70,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOLORADO THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $45,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUSAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACCESS OPPORTUNITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDISCOVER LIFE IN AMERICA INC: $4,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetThe Ocean Foundation: $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Conservatory of Dance Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT ON EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN RIDING THERAPY ↗
  • Who funds IGNITE ADAPTIVE SPORTS ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOULDER VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Rape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) ↗
  • Who funds CHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds EYE TO EYE INC DBA THE NEURODIVERSITY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds WARRIOR EXPEDITIONS ↗
  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds Via Mobility Services ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds USAGAINSTALZHEIMER'S ↗
  • Who funds BVKID ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS OPPORTUNITY ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVER LIFE IN AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Ocean Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Colorado Conservatory of Dance Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO22.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · AEC Trust · Starting Line Foundation · The Wolf Family Foundation · The Longmont Community Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jumping Mouse Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jumping Mouse Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jumping Mouse Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jumping Mouse Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jumping Mouse’s filings →

More from the funding graph