Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Julia and Tunnicliff Fox Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$180k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$401kArts & Culture$310kHealth$220kEducation$140kRecreation & Sports$30kYouth Development$25kCommunity Improvement$15kCivil Rights$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VERSABILITY RESOURCES$15,000
RICHMOND PERFORMING ARTS ALLIANCE$15,000
TIDEWATER ARTS OUTREACH$15,000
CRISTO REY RICHMOND$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
SOAR365$15,000
SHELTERING ARMS FOUNDATION$15,000
ART 180$15,000
RICHMOND BALLET INC$15,000
NEXTUP RVA$15,000
ALEXANDRIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC$15,000
HIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $182k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FEE FOUNDATION FOR REHABILITATION: $14k → 8%CIRCLE CENTER ADULT DAY SERVICES: $15k → 9%NEXTUP RVA: $15k → 9%NEXTUP RVA: $10k → 9%PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $30k → 9%YWCA OF RICHMOND: $10k → 22%COMMONWEALTH CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $53k → 9%COMMONWEALTH CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $35k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$742k · 16 repeat orgs$484k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
29

Total granted

$742k
$469k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+13%

Still filing today

81%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHealthCivil RightsCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SACRED HEART CENTER INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $183k · revenue +89%
  • CC
    Commonwealth Catholic Charities
    2× · 2017–2018 · $88k · revenue +72%
  • CR
    Cristo Rey Richmond High School Inc
    3× · 2020–2025 · $45k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • BS
    Bon Secours Richmond Healthcare Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -39%
  • SM
    SCIENCE MUSEUM OF VIRGINIA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue -3%
  • VR
    VALENTINE RICHMOND HISTORIAL MUSEUM
    one grant, 2017 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Richmond Art Center

To be a catalyst in Richmond for learning and living through art.

Arts & Culture
2
Academy of Richmond County
3
The Richmond Symphony

The richmond symphony performs, teaches and champions music to inspire and unite our communities.

Arts & Culture
4
Virginia Center for Inclusive Communities

VCIC works with schools, businesses, and communities to achieve success through inclusion.

Civil Rights
5
Roanoke Symphony Orchestra

The Roanoke Symphony Orchestra provides a professional symphony orchestra of artistic excellence and integrity to enrich lives, to educate, and to entertain diverse audiences in western Virginia with the highest quality instrumental and…

Arts & Culture
6
Virginia Center for the Creative Arts

Vcca's mission is to provide time and space for national and international writers, visual artists, and composers of talent and promise to bring forth their finest works, because the arts are vital, diversity is a strength, and creativity…

Arts & Culture
7
Richmond Civic Theatre Inc

Creating live community theatre experiences that engage, entertain, educate, and enlighten.

Arts & Culture
8
Riverviews

Creating spaces where contemporary art inspires connection, sparks creativity, and fosters innovation.

Arts & Culture
9
Vpm Media Corporation

To use the power of media to educate, entertain and inspire, using public television and public radio to make a positive impact on the communities throughout central virginia, charlottesville, the shenandoah valley, the northern neck and…

Arts & Culture
10
Richmond Residential Services Inc

Richmond residential services strives to provide person-centered care for individuals with diverse abilities and support needs, facilitating choice, growth and community participation

Human Services
11
The Virginia Air & Space Center

To serve as the region's leading source of informational science education through interactive science demonstrations, hands-on education programs and outreach programs.

Arts & Culture
12
Adult Day Care of Richmond Inc

Organization serves frail adults by providing supervised activities designed to alleviate the effects of social isolation and the deterioration that often accompanies a lack of physical and intellectual stimulation. families of clients are…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Commonwealth Catholic Charities and the most unlike its peers is Circle Center Adult Day Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyProfessional Theater & Perf…Youth Academic EnrichmentIndependent SchoolsChild Welfare & Early Child…Youth Sports ProgramsAffordable Housing Developm…Virginia Industry & Sector …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%3%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%9%10–20yr17%34%20–35yr16%25%35–55yr15%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%3%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%11%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr16%18%35–55yr15%44%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
12%
2,144/17,320

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/34
Grantees still filing
24/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SACRED HEART CENTER INC — $183,000 · OtherSACRED HEART CENTER INCIndividual grant recipient — $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBon Secours Richmond Healthcare Foundation — $50,000 · OtherBon Secours Richmond Healthcare FoundationVALENTINE RICHMOND HISTORIAL MUSEUM — $30,000 · OtherHIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC — $30,000 · OtherSPORTABLE RICHMOND ADAPTIVE SPORTS — $30,000 · OtherVERSABILITY RESOURCES INC — $25,000 · OtherAlexandria Symphony Orchestra — $25,000 · Other+16 more — $205,000 · Other+16 moreSCIENCE MUSEUM OF VIRGINIA FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 · Arts & CultureSCIENCE MUSEUM OF VIR…ART 180 Inc — $40,000 · Arts & CultureART 180 IncTHE RICHMOND BALLET — $35,000 · Arts & CultureTHE RICHMOND BALLETDOGTOWN DANCE THEATRE — $30,000 · Arts & CultureDOGTOWN DANCE THEATRETIDEWATER ARTS OUTREACH — $25,000 · Arts & CultureTIDEWATER ARTS OUTREA…RICHMOND PERFORMING ARTS ALLIANCE — $25,000 · Arts & CultureRICHMOND PERFORMING A…ELEGBA FOLKLORE SOCIETY INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureELEGBA FOLKLORE SOCIE…The Virginia Holocaust Museum — $15,000 · Arts & CultureThe Virginia Holocaus…ACADEMY CENTER OF THE ARTS INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureCommonwealth Catholic Charities — $88,000 · Human ServicesCommonwealth Cat…PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesPETER PAUL DEVEL…NEXTUP RVA — $25,000 · Human ServicesNEXTUP RVACircle Center Adult Day Services — $15,000 · Human ServicesCircle Center Ad…FREE FOUNDATION FOR REHABILITATION EQUIPMENT & ENDOWMENT — $14,000 · Human ServicesFREE FOUNDATION …YWCA RICHMOND — $10,000 · Human ServicesYWCA RICHMONDCristo Rey Richmond High School Inc — $45,000 · EducationJSARGEANT REYNOLDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · EducationTHE VISUAL ARTS CENTER OF RICHMOND — $10,000 · EducationPOSITIVE VIBE FOUNDATION — $45,500 · HealthSHELTERING ARMS FOUNDATION — $25,000 · HealthRISE RICHMOND INC — $15,000 · Crime & LegalCHESTERFIELD CASA INC — $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$643,000Arts & Culture$235,000Human Services$182,000Education$75,000Health$70,500Crime & Legal$15,000Civil Rights$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSACRED HEART CENTER INC — $183,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetCommonwealth Catholic Charities — $88,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBon Secours Richmond Healthcare Foundation — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPOSITIVE VIBE FOUNDATION — $45,500 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetCristo Rey Richmond High School Inc — $45,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSCIENCE MUSEUM OF VIRGINIA FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetART 180 Inc — $40,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetTHE RICHMOND BALLET — $35,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $30,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetDOGTOWN DANCE THEATRE — $30,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetSHELTERING ARMS FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTIDEWATER ARTS OUTREACH — $25,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetVERSABILITY RESOURCES INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEXTUP RVA — $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRICHMOND PERFORMING ARTS ALLIANCE — $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAlexandria Symphony Orchestra — $25,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetJSARGEANT REYNOLDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetA GRACE PLACE ADULT CARE CENTER — $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSOUTH RICHMOND ADULT DAY CARE CENTER — $15,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetCircle Center Adult Day Services — $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHILDSAVERS- MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRISE RICHMOND INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetELEGBA FOLKLORE SOCIETY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetThe Virginia Holocaust Museum — $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFREE FOUNDATION FOR REHABILITATION EQUIPMENT & ENDOWMENT — $14,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetYWCA RICHMOND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREADING AND EDUCATION FOR ADULT DEVELOPMENT — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDEPAUL COMMUNITY RESOURCES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VISUAL ARTS CENTER OF RICHMOND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetACADEMY CENTER OF THE ARTS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHESTERFIELD CASA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetELIJAH HOUSE ACADEMY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation IncVA49.4× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · Herndon Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Shelton H Short Jr Trust · The Pauley Family Foundation · Virginia Nonprofit Housing Coalition · Robins Foundation · Windsor Fdn Trust Uw Quincy Cole · Wilbur Moreland Havens Charitable Foundation · The William H - John G - Emma Scott Foundation · Tesco Foundation · The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Julia and Tunnicliff Fox Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Julia and Tunnicliff Fox Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Julia and Tunnicliff Fox Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph