Skip to content
Juilfs Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Juilfs Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$80k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$107kPhilanthropy$105kRecreation & Sports$91kAnimals$90kPublic Safety & Disaster$57kYouth Development$46kEmployment$45kReligion$27kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KECC UNITED WAY KENTUCKY$14,500
ANDERSON FOUNDATION FOR PARKS AND REC$10,000
ANIMAL RESCUE FUND$10,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER CINCINNATI$10,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$5,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
CINCINNATI WORKS$5,000
CLERMONT SENIOR SERVICES$5,000
PIERCE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT$4,000
A CARING PLACE$2,500
PIERCE TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT$2,500
LIFESTREAM CHRISTIAN CHURCH$2,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS GR CINCINNATI$2,000
DAN BEARD COUNCIL - SCOUTING AMERICA$1,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN OHIO$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $99k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%CLERMONT SENIOR SERVICES INC: $6k → 9%CLERMONT SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 9%CLERMONT SENIOR SERVICES INC: $5k → 9%CLERMONT SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 9%CLERMONT SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 9%CLERMONT SENIOR SERVICES INC: $5k → 9%CLERMONT SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 9%CLERMONT SENIOR SERVICES INC: $5k → 9%STEPPING STONES: $3k → 16%STEPPING STONES INC: $3k → 16%BEECH ACRES: $500 → 16%BEECH ACRES: $500 → 16%BEECH ACRES: $500 → 16%BEECH ACRES: $500 → 16%BEECH ACRES: $500 → 16%BEECH ACRES: $500 → 16%CINCINNATI WORKS: $5k → 16%CINCINNATI WORKS: $5k → 16%CINCINNATI WORKS: $5k → 16%CINCINNATI WORKS: $5k → 16%CINCINNATI WORKS: $5k → 16%CINCINNATI WORKS: $5k → 16%CINCINNATI WORKS: $5k → 16%CINCINNATI WORKS: $5k → 16%CINCINNATI WORKS: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$562k · 28 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
13

Total granted

$562k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+232%

Still filing today

57%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ANDERSON FOUNDATION FOR PARKS & REC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +17%
  • CW
    CINCINNATI WORKS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +19%
  • CS
    Clermont Senior Services Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • CM
    CINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -54%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter
2
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
3
Greater Cleveland Volunteers

Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…

Philanthropy
4
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Greater Cincinnati Inc

Ronald mcdonald house charities of greater cincinnati offers a community of compassion, support and the comforts of home to families with critically ill children, steps away from the medical care they need.

Human Services
5
Central Ohio Workers Center Inc

The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.

Civil Rights
6
United Way of Central Ohio Inc

United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…

Philanthropy
7
Butler County United Way

Connect resources to important community needs. the organization focuses on the most important human service needs facing the community and uses a variety of methods to communicate with community members in order to priortize the issues…

—
8
The Greater Cincinnati Foundation

As a trusted and connected partner, we inspire generous people to invest in a more equitable and vibrant region now and for generations to come.

Philanthropy
9
United Way of Greater Lima Inc

United Way improves lives by uniting the caring power of our community.

—
10
Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.

—
11
Community Shelter Board

The community shelter board is ending homelessness by creating collaborations, innovating solutions, and investing in quality programs.

—
12
Agriculteral Extension Camps Inc

4-h camp ohio is a year round resident camp specializing in youth education. the camp serves 13 counties of 4-h groups & 1 state leadership camp. school & outdoor ed groups are the mainstay of the business from march through may & sept…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater Cincinnati; the most unlike its peers is Tin Roof Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
11/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY: $45,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYAMERICAN RED CROSS: $42,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSPIERCE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT: $20,800 · OtherPIERCE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENTBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CINCINNATI: $15,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CINCINNATIKECC UNITED WAY KENTUCKY: $14,500 · OtherKECC UNITED WAY KENTUCKYLIFESTREAM CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $12,000 · OtherA CARING PLACE: $10,000 · OtherUNITED WAY: $10,000 · Other+25 more: $77,500 · Other+25 moreCINCINNATI WORKS: $45,000 · Human ServicesCINCINNATI WORKSClermont Senior Services Inc: $41,000 · Human ServicesClermont Senior Se…STEPPING STONES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 · Human Services+2 more: $6,000 · Human Services+2 moreANDERSON FOUNDATION FOR PARKS & REC: $90,000 · Recreation & SportsANDERSON FOUNDAT…ANIMAL RESCUE FUND INC: $90,000 · AnimalsANIMAL RESCUE FU…United Way of Greater Cincinnati: $80,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of …GORMAN HERITAGE FARM FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EnvironmentCINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTRI-STATE WARBIRD MUSEUM: $1,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$246,800Human Services$102,000Recreation & Sports$90,000Animals$90,000Philanthropy$80,000Environment$7,500Arts & Culture$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANDERSON FOUNDATION FOR PARKS & REC: $90,000 over 9y, 25% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE FUND INC: $90,000 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Cincinnati: $80,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCINCINNATI WORKS: $45,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetClermont Senior Services Inc: $41,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA COUNCIL 438 DAN BEARD: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGORMAN HERITAGE FARM FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGirl Scouts of Western Ohio: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPPING STONES INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMatthew 25 Ministries Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEEDIEST KIDS OF ALL: $3,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBEECH ACRES: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPOLICE & FIRE RETIREES OF OHIO INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMAY WE HELP INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGATEWAY HOUSE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANDERSON FOUNDATION FOR PARKS & REC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Greater Cincinnati ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI WORKS ↗
  • Who funds Clermont Senior Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA COUNCIL 438 DAN BEARD ↗
  • Who funds GORMAN HERITAGE FARM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of Western Ohio ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER CINCINNATI ↗
  • Who funds STEPPING STONES INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Matthew 25 Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds TIN ROOF FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEEDIEST KIDS OF ALL ↗
  • Who funds BEECH ACRES ↗
  • Who funds POLICE & FIRE RETIREES OF OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-STATE WARBIRD MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnat…The James J and Joan …The Thomas J Emery Me…Duke Energy FoundationJohnson Charitable Gi…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Maxwell C Weaver Foun…Andrew Jergens Founda…Williams FoundationHcs FoundationSpaulding FoundationRobert a & Marian K K…
The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH28.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · The James J and Joan a Gardner Family Foundation · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Duke Energy Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Maxwell C Weaver Foundation · Andrew Jergens Foundation · Williams Foundation · Hcs Foundation · Spaulding Foundation · Robert a & Marian K Kennedy Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Juilfs Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Juilfs Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Juilfs’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home