Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jpaul Carey and Nancy W Carey Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$200
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$45kHuman Services$4kFood & Nutrition$2kArts & Culture$1kHousing & Shelter$1kEducation$1kRecreation & Sports$350Health$240Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
1
States reached
$19k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND$200
GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$200
Individual grant recipient$200
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OAKLAND CO$200
MICHIGAN PUBLIC RADIO(NPR)$200
ROCHESTER PUBLIC LIBRARY$200
SALVATION ARMY$200
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE$200
ROCHESTER AREA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TONI & TRISH HOUSE: $30 → 14%ROCHESTER AREA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $200 → 8%ROCHESTER AREA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $200 → 8%ROCHESTER AREA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $200 → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $200 → 8%ROCHESTER AREA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $150 → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $150 → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $150 → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $150 → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $150 → 8%ROCHESTER AREA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $150 → 8%ROCHESTER AREA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $150 → 8%ROCHESTER AREA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $125 → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $125 → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 8%ROCHESTER AREA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $100 → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $50 → 8%BALDWIN CENTER: $400 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$56k · 14 repeat orgs$920 to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

$56k
$920

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+7%

Still filing today

36%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RA
    ROCHESTER AREA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1k · revenue +67%
  • LD
    LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1k · revenue +26%
  • FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $525 · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BALDWIN CENTER INC
    one grant, 2021 · $400 · revenue -22%
  • DR
    Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries
    one grant, 2021 · $100 · revenue -5%
  • CC
    CASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100 · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan

Expressing God's love by reaching out to the hurting and homeless of the Great Lakes Bay Region by providing shelter and care, proclaiming the Gospel of Christ, and establishing Christian disciples among disadvantaged people.

Housing & Shelter
2
Michigan Christian Home

The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…

—
3
Community & Home Supports Inc

Community & home supports, inc. was founded to help people and communities address poverty and homelessness. we strive to fulfill our purpose by developing, leading, and participating in collaborative and innovative efforts that support…

Human Services
4
Wings of Hope Hospice & Palliative Care Inc

Hospice care - wings of hope hospice and palliative care, inc. provides compassionate care in the later stages of life and support through the grief experience for individuals and families.

Human Services
5
Macomb Residential Opportunities Inc

To serve individuals with disabilities by providing residential and personal support in a manner that promotes individual dignity, community integration and quality of life

—
6
Habitat for Humanity of Michigan Inc

Our mission is to assist our affiliates to increase capacity to build simple decent homes in partnership with people in need in the State of Michigan.

Housing & Shelter
7
Detroit Friendship House Inc

Friendship house meets the basic needs of low income residents of hamtramck, mi. this assistance includes food, clothing, baby supplies and school supplies.

Human Services
8
Hospice of Michigan Inc

Hospice of Michigan, Inc. meets our patients and families where they are with urgency, purpose and compassionate accountability surrounding them with decades of dedicated hospice expertise.

Human Services
9
The Comfort Home Mi

Provide no cost care and no cost room and board for the terminally ill.

Human Services
10
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

—
11
Housing Services of Mid Michigan

To assist people with low or moderate income to obtain safe and affordable housing

Housing & Shelter
12
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Forgotten Harvest Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gleaners Community Food Bank of Southeastern Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LUKE'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $44,752 · OtherST LUKE'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH+13 more: $7,475 · Other+13 moreROCHESTER AREA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $1,275 · Human ServicesLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $1,075 · Human ServicesTHE BALDWIN CENTER INC: $400 · Human Services+1 more: $30 · Human ServicesGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $1,275 · Food & NutritionFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $525 · Food & NutritionSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $350 · Recreation & SportsDetroit Rescue Mission Ministries: $100 · HealthFaith Hospice: $40 · Health
Other$52,227Human Services$2,780Food & Nutrition$1,800Recreation & Sports$350Health$140

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $1,275 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetROCHESTER AREA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $1,275 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $1,075 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $525 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BALDWIN CENTER INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDetroit Rescue Mission Ministries: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFaith Hospice: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTONI & TRISH HOUSE FOR THE TERMINALLY ILL: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds ROCHESTER AREA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BALDWIN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries ↗
  • Who funds CASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Faith Hospice ↗
  • Who funds TONI & TRISH HOUSE FOR THE TERMINALLY ILL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL13.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jpaul Carey and Nancy W Carey Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jpaul Carey and Nancy W Carey Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jpaul Carey and Nancy W Carey Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jpaul Carey and Nancy W Carey Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jpaul Carey and Nancy W Carey’s filings →

    More from the funding graph