Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joyce Swan Foundation Ima Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$165kHuman Services$76kYouth Development$20kScience & Tech$17kEducation$17kCommunity Improvement$15kInternational$12kHealth$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE NEW INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY$13,500
CRAFTSMEN ONE TWENTY GLOBAL$8,500
EMPTY CRADLE$5,000
FAMILY POLICY OF WASHINGTON$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
YES FOUNDATION OF WHITE CENTER$5,000
WESTGATE CHAPEL$3,000
INSTITUTE FOR CREATION RESEARCH$3,000
LANCE WALLNAU MINISTRIES$3,000
JOYCE MEYER MINISTRIES$3,000
ANDREW WOMMACK MINISTRIES$3,000
IWIKUA$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WORLD IMPACT NETWORK: $18k → 9%WORLD IMPACT NETWORK: $12k → 9%WORLD IMPACT NETWORK: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
IL
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
TN
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$309k · 15 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
10

Total granted

$309k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
0%

Still filing today

33%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentScience & TechHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CRAFTSMEN ONE TWENTY GLOBAL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $92k
  • WI
    World Impact Network
    3× · 2021–2023 · $39k · revenue -8%
  • FP
    FAMILY POLICY OF WASHINGTON
    6× · 2020–2025 · $25k

Funded once

  • WI
    WORLD IMPACT NETWORK FBO THE NEW
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • MI
    MISSION IN MOTION
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • AS
    All San Diego Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -84%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kauai Island Ministries Inc

Reunite churches and people on island of kaua

Religion
2
Explore God Network
—
3
Korean World Mission Council
Religion
4
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
5
Worldwide Evangelistic Ministry

Worldwide Evangelistic Ministry is an apostolic and prophetic movement in the earth called to equip, unite, and release an end-time army of believers into the earth.

Religion
6
Shine in the World Ministries

Shine exists to proclaim Jesus Christ to all lost peoples around the world, to mobilize the local church to embrace the Great Commission, and to equip the present and next generation of leaders in their spiritual quest and service to God…

International
7
International Chapel Ministries

Evangelize japanese by establishing chapels, home bible studies, training and production of literature for free distribution.

—
8
Israel Restoration Ministries
Religion
9
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
10
Kim Walker Smith Ministries

Preach, communicate and spread the gospel of jesus christ through all means, including the training and educating of worship leaders, songwriters, and teams, songwriting and music production, and the organization of events related to the…

Religion
11
Reconciliation Ministries International Inc

Reconciliaton Ministries Intl. is a Christian evangelical organization preaching and teaching the Word of God in over 60 countries. The ministry equips and encourages Christians everywhere to be saved, healed, and delivered according to…

Religion
12
Raise Up Global Ministries

Raise Up Global Ministries is committed to educating Christian leaders in communities around the world. The three programs of Raise Up equip the global church by 1 Developing biblically based interactive materials and 2 Training…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Institute for Creation Research; the most unlike its peers is Iwikua. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRAFTSMEN ONE TWENTY GLOBAL: $91,650 · OtherCRAFTSMEN ONE TWENTY GLOBALFAMILY POLICY OF WASHINGTON: $25,450 · OtherFAMILY POLICY OF WASHINGTONJOYCE MEYER MINISTRIES INC: $16,725 · OtherJOYCE MEYER MINISTRIES INCWESTGATE CHAPEL: $16,725 · OtherWESTGATE CHAPELTHE NEW INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $16,500 · OtherTHE NEW INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITYWORLD IMPACT NETWORK FBO THE NEW: $11,940 · OtherMISSION IN MOTION: $11,740 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $11,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $11,500 · Other+7 more: $18,330 · Other+7 moreWorld Impact Network: $38,750 · Human ServicesWorld Impact…Andrew Wommack Ministries Inc: $16,725 · ReligionLANCE WALLNAU MINISTRIES INC: $8,450 · ReligionTHE YES FOUNDATION OF WHITE CENTER: $19,590 · Youth DevelopmentAll San Diego Inc: $9,700 · Community ImprovementRICE STREET BUSINESS ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · Community ImprovementIWIKUA: $3,000 · Community ImprovementINSTITUTE FOR CREATION RESEARCH: $16,725 · Science & TechEMPTY CRADLE: $11,235 · HealthCHURCH'S MINISTRY AMONG JEWISH PEOPLE: $1,000 · Education
Other$232,060Human Services$38,750Religion$25,175Youth Development$19,590Community Improvement$17,700Science & Tech$16,725Health$11,235Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWorld Impact Network: $38,750 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetTHE YES FOUNDATION OF WHITE CENTER: $19,590 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetAndrew Wommack Ministries Inc: $16,725 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR CREATION RESEARCH: $16,725 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEMPTY CRADLE: $11,235 over 2y, 14% of budgetAll San Diego Inc: $9,700 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetLANCE WALLNAU MINISTRIES INC: $8,450 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRICE STREET BUSINESS ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCHURCH'S MINISTRY AMONG JEWISH PEOPLE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds World Impact Network ↗
  • Who funds THE YES FOUNDATION OF WHITE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Andrew Wommack Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR CREATION RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds EMPTY CRADLE ↗
  • Who funds All San Diego Inc ↗
  • Who funds LANCE WALLNAU MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds RICE STREET BUSINESS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds IWIKUA ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH'S MINISTRY AMONG JEWISH PEOPLE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joyce Swan Foundation Ima Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joyce Swan Foundation Ima Xxx-Xx-Xxxx. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Joyce Swan Foundation Ima Xxx-Xx-Xxxx?

    Find your warmest path to Joyce Swan Foundation Ima Xxx-Xx-Xxxx through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joyce Swan Foundation Ima Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s filings →

    More from the funding graph