Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Josephine Anderson Charitable Trust

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$329k
Granted FY2025still arriving
54
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 52% of JOSEPHINE ANDERSON CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 54 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 54 grants below total $274,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $328,600 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $54,100 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k48 grants · $195k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $80k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Josephine Anderson Leadership Scholarship WTAMU Fnd.$30,000
Laura Bush Institute for Women's Health$10,000
Amarillo Little Theatre$10,000
Kids, Inc.$10,000
Amarillo Opera$10,000
Panhandle-Plains Historical Museum$10,000
Opportunity School$5,000
Sister Bear Foundation$5,000
Catholic Charities of the Texas Panhandle$5,000
Borger Chamber of Commerce$5,000
Pampa Youth & Community Center$5,000
Amarillo Children's Home$5,000
Kids, Inc.$5,000
Don Harrington Discovery Center$5,000
Golden Spread Council - BSA$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $185k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%A WORLD FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 6%DONLEY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $5k → 18%FAITH CITY MISSION: $10k → 20%TEXAS BOYS RANCH: $3k → 17%DONLEY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $5k → 18%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 20%DONLEY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $4k → 18%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 20%DONLEY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $4k → 18%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 20%CATHOLIC CHARITIES TEXAS PANHANDLE: $5k → 9%FAITH CITY MISSION: $5k → 20%CATHOLIC CHARITIES TEXAS PANHANDLE: $5k → 9%AMARILLO CHILDREN'S HOME: $5k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES TEXAS PANHANDLE: $5k → 9%AMARILLO CHILDREN'S HOME: $5k → 9%A WORLD FOR CHILDREN INC: $2k → 9%A WORLD FOR CHILDREN INC: $2k → 9%A WORLD FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 9%ADVO COMPANIES INC: $5k → 9%THE BRIDGE: $10k → 20%THE BRIDGE: $10k → 20%ELIZABETH RUTH'S HOME: $3k → 9%THE BRIDGE: $10k → 20%THE BRIDGE: $10k → 20%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $10k → 20%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $10k → 20%MEALS ON WHEELS: $10k → 20%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $5k → 20%MEALS ON WHEELS: $5k → 20%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $5k → 20%MEALS ON WHEELS: $5k → 20%MEALS ON WHEELS: $5k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 89 repeat orgs$350k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

89 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2025, 52 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

89
59

Total granted

$1.7M
$274k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
0%

Still filing today

63%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthEducationRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    AMARILLO LITTLE THEATER INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $60k · revenue +12%
  • DW
    DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $55k · revenue +12%
  • HP
    HIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK
    5× · 2019–2025 · $50k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • AR
    AMARILLO RECOVERY FROM ALCOHOL AND DRUGS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • HT
    HOPE TO OPPORTUNITIES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -32%
  • TA
    THE AMARILLO COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +139%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Medical Center League House of Amarillo Texas Inc

To serve as a home away from home for patients and their families coming to amarillo, texas for health care treatment.

Health
2
Hendrick Home for Children
—
3
Center City of Amarillo Inc

Center city of amarillo, inc., brings people to downtown amarillo through organization, events, promotion, design and facilitation of economic restructuring.

Community Improvement
4
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
5
Amarillo Tribune

The purpose or purposes for which the corporation is organized shall be limited to: (a)providing information about public policy, politics, government, and national and statewide issues to the general public.

Community Improvement
6
Amarillo Area Adult Literacy Council Inc

Promotion of adult literacy in the texas panhandle.

—
7
Aaf Community Health Foundation

Support organization of amarillo area foundation, inc. to provide and support medical and health care facilities, services, and education in amarillo, texas, and the texas panhandle area.

Health
8
The Parc

A caring, relational place that promotes a sense of self-worth and helps the homeless become aware of their possibilities

Human Services
9
Amarillo Botanical Gardens

To inspire people to connect with plants through education, experience, and enjoyment

Environment
10
Hospice of Texarkana

The hospice of texarkana operation provides care to the terminally ill and provides grief support to the community. hospice of texarkana also has an inpatient facility available for our patients to receive care.

Health
11
Downtown Amarillo Inc

Downtown amarillo, inc. is committed to making downtown amarillo a vibrant and attractive place.

Community Improvement
12
Children's Home of Lubbock and Family Service Agency Inc

Working in creative collaboration to provide quality care that transforms the lives of at-risk children and their families through the active compassion of christ.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amarillo Wesley Community Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is 107 Golf Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFamily Foundations & Grantm…Amarillo Area Philanthropic…Christian International Rel…Amarillo Community Organiza…Panhandle Regional Organiza…Youth Sports and School Act…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%6%<5yr12%9%5–10yr17%15%10–20yr13%12%20–35yr11%30%35–55yr20%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%3%<5yr12%5%5–10yr17%9%10–20yr13%19%20–35yr11%32%35–55yr20%31%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/97
the rest of the field
10%
95/936

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

92 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 92 of the 165 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
25
Early backer (in before they grew)
89/92
Grantees still filing
51/92
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $55,000 · OtherHIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK — $50,000 · OtherLONE STAR BALLET INC — $40,000 · OtherGOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL INC 562 OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $40,000 · Other+111 more — $1,001,500 · Other+111 moreAMARILLO LITTLE THEATER INC — $60,000 · Arts & CultureAMARILLO LITTLE…AMARILLO OPERA INC — $45,000 · Arts & CultureAMARILLO OPERA …AMARILLO SYMPHONY INC — $40,000 · Arts & CultureAMARILLO SYMPHO…TEXAS PANHANDLE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Arts & CultureTEXAS PANHANDLE…WINDOW ON A WIDER WORLD INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureWINDOW ON A WID…TEXAS PANHANDLE WAR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureTEXAS PANHANDLE…AMARILLO ART INSTITUTE INC — $23,000 · Arts & CultureAMARILLO ART IN…DON HARRINGTON DISCOVERY CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $12,500 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $10,500 · Arts & CultureTHE BRIDGE — $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE BRIDGEANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE — $40,000 · Human ServicesANOTHER CHANCE…DONLEY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC — $27,000 · Human ServicesDONLEY COUNTY …MEALS ON WHEELS — $25,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEEL…BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesBUCKNER CHILDR…FAITH CITY INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesFAITH CITY INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE — $20,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARI…PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN — $20,000 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN H…A WORLD FOR CHILDREN — $15,000 · Human ServicesA WORLD FOR CH…+9 more — $39,500 · Human Services+9 moreTHE HOPE AND HEALING PLACE INC — $37,500 · HealthCOALITION OF HEALTH SERVICES INC — $27,500 · HealthPANHANDLE BREAST HEALTH — $11,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF AMARILLO — $5,000 · HealthSISTER-BEAR FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Health+4 more — $10,000 · HealthAMERICAN QUARTER HORSE FOUNDATION — $43,000 · AnimalsAMARILLO SPCA — $20,000 · AnimalsDOVE CREEK EQUINE RESCUE & SANCTUARY — $12,500 · AnimalsGIRL SCOUTS OF TEXAS OKLAHOMA PLAINS INC — $21,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH SUCCESS PROJECT — $11,000 · Youth DevelopmentMAVERICK BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF AMARILLO INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentTYLER STREET RESOURCE CENTER INC — $18,000 · Recreation & SportsAMARILLO TRI-STATE EXPOSITION — $16,000 · Recreation & SportsSPEARHEAD CORPORATION — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsEASTRIDGE MISSION CENTER — $7,500 · Recreation & Sports107 Golf Academy — $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,186,500Arts & Culture$271,000Human Services$266,500Health$96,000Animals$75,500Youth Development$62,000Recreation & Sports$56,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMARILLO LITTLE THEATER INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $55,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetHIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK — $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMARILLO OPERA INC — $45,000 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetAMERICAN QUARTER HORSE FOUNDATION — $43,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAMARILLO SYMPHONY INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetLONE STAR BALLET INC — $40,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetTHE BRIDGE — $40,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetGOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL INC 562 OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $40,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE — $40,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTHE HOPE AND HEALING PLACE INC — $37,500 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS RAMP PROJECT — $35,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTEXAS PANHANDLE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCOALITION OF HEALTH SERVICES INC — $27,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDONLEY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC — $27,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS — $25,000 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetAMARILLO AREA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC — $25,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetWINDOW ON A WIDER WORLD INC — $25,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetTEXAS PANHANDLE WAR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetOPPORTUNITY SCHOOL INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAMARILLO ART INSTITUTE INC — $23,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF TEXAS OKLAHOMA PLAINS INC — $21,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMARILLO SPCA — $20,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH CITY INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE — $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN — $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTYLER STREET RESOURCE CENTER INC — $18,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetCETA CANYON CAMP & RETREAT CENTER — $17,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAMARILLO TRI-STATE EXPOSITION — $16,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetA WORLD FOR CHILDREN — $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY INC — $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH PLAINS CHILDREN'S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $15,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGES TO LIFE — $12,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDON HARRINGTON DISCOVERY CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $12,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDOVE CREEK EQUINE RESCUE & SANCTUARY — $12,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetPANHANDLE BREAST HEALTH — $11,000 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetYOUTH SUCCESS PROJECT — $11,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetHIGH PLAINS HELPING HANDS INC — $10,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetHOPE TO OPPORTUNITIES FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE AMARILLO COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMAVERICK BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF AMARILLO INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCENIKOR FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLLANO CEMETERY ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSPEARHEAD CORPORATION — $10,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetAMARILLO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMARILLO LITTLE THEATER INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds AMARILLO OPERA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN QUARTER HORSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMARILLO SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds LONE STAR BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL INC 562 OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE HOPE AND HEALING PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS RAMP PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS PANHANDLE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COALITION OF HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds DONLEY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds AMARILLO AREA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds WINDOW ON A WIDER WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS PANHANDLE WAR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMARILLO ART INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF TEXAS OKLAHOMA PLAINS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMARILLO RECOVERY FROM ALCOHOL AND DRUGS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMARILLO SPCA ↗
  • Who funds BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FAITH CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amarillo Area Foundat…Dr Kent Roberts & Ile…Mary E Bivins Foundat…Kimble Foundation Tru…High Plains Christian…Cj and Syble Fowlston…Amarillo Business Fou…Mays FoundationThe Don & Sybil Harri…Brumley FoundationXcel Energy FoundationWilliam & Louise Mull…
Amarillo Area Foundation IncTX140.8× affinity69 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · Dr Kent Roberts & Ilene Roberts Balliett Foundation · Mary E Bivins Foundation · Kimble Foundation Trust · High Plains Christian Ministries Foundation · Cj and Syble Fowlston Charitable Trust · Amarillo Business Foundation · Mays Foundation · The Don & Sybil Harrington Foundation · Brumley Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · William & Louise Mullins Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Josephine Anderson Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 165 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2026) is on record and reports $372k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2025, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines