Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph R Bayer Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$121k
Granted FY2023
34
Grants FY2023
9
States reached
$76k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

52% of Joseph R Bayer Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Venn Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 19 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Joseph R Bayer Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 20 organizations, $121k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’21
23
’22
20
’23
19
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Philanthropy$753kReligion$664kEducation$555kEmployment$188kFood & Nutrition$15kCommunity Improvement$8kHealth$7kYouth Development$7kOther$0
02FY2023 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k32 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $76k
$500
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANNANDALE ARTS & TEXTILE CENTER$76,095
ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH$20,000
PLEASANT LAKE IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION$2,550
ANNANDALE FOOD SHELF$2,500
ANNANDALE YOUTH FIRST$1,500
PANCAN$1,500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,500
UNION GOSPEL MISSION$1,500
ANNANDALE PUBLIC SCHOOLS$1,500
EXCELSIOR UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
GUTHRIE THEATRE$1,000
ICA FOOD SHELF$1,000
GRACE LUTHERAN CHURCH$1,000
SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ICA FOOD SHELF: $2k → 11%ICA FOOD SHELF: $1k → 11%ICA FOOD SHELF: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
OR
CA
CO
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$918k · 34 repeat orgs$563k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
8

Total granted

$918k
$553k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+4%

Still filing today

47%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentInternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ANNANDALE ART AND TEXTILE CENTER
    4× · 2021–2024 · $188k · revenue +70% · 28% of their budget
  • AF
    ANNANDALE FOOD SHELF
    3× · 2022–2024 · $9k · revenue +50%
  • UG
    UNION GOSPEL MISSION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $5k · revenue +298%

Funded once

  • BB
    BELGRADE BROOTEN ELROSA SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2021 · $550k
  • FM
    Fountains Methodist Church
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • MP
    MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA
    one grant, 2022 · $540 · revenue -34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
2
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
3
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
4
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

—
5
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
6
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
7
Mill City Farmers Market Inc

Mission: to inspire and nurture a healthy community by building a local, sustainable, and organic food economy in a vibrant experiential marketplace.vision: to be a nationally recognized marketplace model that connects, educates, and…

—
8
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

—
9
Senior Community Services

Our mission is empowering people as they age.

Human Services
10
Minnesota Hospital Association

Advance the health of individuals and communities through leadership, advocacy and collaboration on behalf of minnesota hospitals and health systems. vision: minnesotans are healthy and have access to the right care at the right time in…

Community Improvement
11
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
12
Minnesota Grocers Association

The minnesota grocers association advances the common interest of those engaged in all aspects of the food industry of mn as a leadership resource. the mga encourages and sponsors educational seminars, conventions and fosters the exchange…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minnesota Assistance Council for Veterans; the most unlike its peers is Hamilton Habitat Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $569,250 · OtherST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCHBELGRADE BROOTEN ELROSA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $550,000 · OtherBELGRADE BROOTEN ELROSA SCHOOL DISTRICTGRACE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $82,300 · OtherGRACE LUTHERAN CHURCH+30 more: $64,405 · OtherVENN FOUNDATION: $752,500 · PhilanthropyVENN FOUNDATION+1 more: $250 · PhilanthropyANNANDALE ART AND TEXTILE CENTER: $188,095 · Arts & CultureANNANDALE…+3 more: $3,990 · Arts & CulturePANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $5,000 · HealthCENTRACARE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,500 · HealthVerdeCares Inc: $1,200 · HealthCaringBridge: $450 · HealthANNANDALE YOUTH FIRST INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL MINNESOTA: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 · InternationalAchon Uganda Childrens Fund: $750 · InternationalINTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 · Human Services
Other$1,265,955Philanthropy$752,750Arts & Culture$192,085Health$8,150Youth Development$6,000International$5,750Human Services$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVENN FOUNDATION: $752,500 over 1y, 11% of budgetANNANDALE ART AND TEXTILE CENTER: $188,095 over 4y, 28% of budgetANNANDALE FOOD SHELF: $8,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION INC: $5,200 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANNANDALE YOUTH FIRST INC: $5,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEARNS COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $2,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAMILTON HABITAT INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCENTRACARE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA ASSISTANCE COUNCIL FOR VETERANS: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVerdeCares Inc: $1,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL MINNESOTA: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAchon Uganda Childrens Fund: $750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA: $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCaringBridge: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXTILE CENTER OF MINNESOTA: $130 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VENN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANNANDALE ART AND TEXTILE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ANNANDALE FOOD SHELF ↗
  • Who funds UNION GOSPEL MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ANNANDALE YOUTH FIRST INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STEARNS COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds HAMILTON HABITAT INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRACARE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA ASSISTANCE COUNCIL FOR VETERANS ↗
  • Who funds VerdeCares Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds Achon Uganda Childrens Fund ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN16.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Morgan Family Foundation · Central Minnesota Arts Board · Initiative Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph R Bayer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph R Bayer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joseph R Bayer Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph