Skip to content
Jonna and Jill Foundation Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Jonna and Jill Foundation Inc

Support the purpose of Christian Community Foundation DBA WaterStone

$307k
Granted FY2022
14
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Recreation & Sports$755kReligion$250kInternational$140kEducation$98kArts & Culture$50kHuman Services$35kHealth$30kFood & Nutrition$25kOther$0
02FY2022 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $290,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $307,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $17,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k12 grants · $190k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$213k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Trail Conservatory$50,000
The Lakeway Church$50,000
Boot Ranch Hall Foundation$25,000
All Gods Children Int$25,000
Samaritans Purse$25,000
Storyline Missions$25,000
KBC Ministries$20,000
Aspen Junior Golf$10,000
University of Texas Found$10,000
Denison Forum$10,000
First Liberty Institute$10,000
Compassion International$10,000
Crossroads Church of Aspen$10,000
Making Jesus Known$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Midland Relief: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$568k · 11 repeat orgs$845k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$568k
$765k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+7%

Still filing today

73%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
InternationalRecreation & SportsReligionPhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CG
    College Golf Fellowship
    2× · 2020–2021 · $120k · revenue +63%
  • AG
    ALL GOD'S CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL
    3× · 2020–2022 · $55k · revenue +8%
  • MJ
    MAKING JESUS KNOWN EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES
    2× · 2021–2022 · $40k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • NT
    NORTHERN TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $625k · revenue +18%
  • TO
    THE OAKS CHARLOTTE
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • MF
    MILAGROS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -47%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
North Texas Christian Foundation

National Christian Foundation North Texas (NCFNT) was created to facilitate smarter Christian giving with sophisticated charitable techniques.

Philanthropy
3
National Christian Foundation -- Wisconsin Inc

Equipping followers of christ to give wisely to advance his kingdom by inspiring biblical stewardship and generosity.

Religion
4
Houston Christian Foundation dba National Christian Foundation Houston

As the Houston affiliate of the National Christian Foundation (NCF), our mission is to serve and encourage givers to grow as faithful stewards who give wisely to further the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

—
5
Greater Austin Christian Foundation

Mobilizing resources by inspiring biblical generosity in the greater austin, texas area.

Religion
6
Christ Together Greater Austin

Ctga is a partnership of pastors and churches seeking to demonstrate and communicate the love of god to the people of greater austin by ensuring that every man, woman, and child has repeated opportunities to see, hear, and respond to the…

Education
7
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
8
Great Commission Foundation in

Missions - sponsors foreign and domestic missions and orphanages with a special emphasis on missions in India

—
9
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
10
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
11
Texas Christian Foundation

Texas Christian Foundations mission is to mobilize resources by inspiring biblical generosity and educating Texans on ways their generosity can impact their community, Texas and the world.

Philanthropy
12
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Austin Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Making Jesus Known Evangelistic Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHERN TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION: $625,000 · Recreation & SportsNORTHERN TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION+1 more: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsLAKEWAY CHURCH: $70,000 · OtherLAKEWAY CHURCHTHE OAKS CHARLOTTE: $50,000 · OtherTHE OAKS CHARLOTTEMAKING JESUS KNOWN EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES: $40,000 · OtherMAKING JESUS KNOWN EVAN…CROSSROADS CHURCH OF ASPEN: $20,000 · OtherCROSSROADS CHURCH OF AS…DENISON MINISTRIES: $10,000 · OtherHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCIL: $10,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherMILAGROS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherMILAGROS FOUNDATIONCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $25,000 · OtherCentral Texas Food Bank…FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $20,000 · OtherFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTEIMAGINE A WAY: $10,000 · OtherFredericksburg Community Health Center: $10,000 · OtherCollege Golf Fellowship: $120,000 · ReligionCollege Golf…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $35,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S …STORYLINE: $110,000 · PhilanthropySTORYLINEAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyAUSTIN COMM…HOPE FOR NEW YORK: $10,000 · PhilanthropyHOPE FOR NE…ALL GOD'S CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL: $55,000 · InternationalKBC Ministries Inc: $30,000 · InternationalCompassion International Incorporated: $20,000 · InternationalThe Trail Conservancy: $50,000 · EnvironmentBOOT RANCH HALL FOUNDATION: $48,000 · Arts & Culture
Recreation & Sports$635,000Other$300,000Religion$155,000Philanthropy$145,000International$105,000Environment$50,000Arts & Culture$48,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHERN TEXAS PGA FOUNDATION: $625,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCollege Golf Fellowship: $120,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetSTORYLINE: $110,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetALL GOD'S CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL: $55,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE OAKS CHARLOTTE: $50,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetThe Trail Conservancy: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBOOT RANCH HALL FOUNDATION: $48,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetMAKING JESUS KNOWN EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES: $40,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKBC Ministries Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetMILAGROS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIMAGINE A WAY: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetASPEN JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetHOPE FOR NEW YORK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFredericksburg Community Health Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY NEEDS COUNCIL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community F…Natl Christian Charit…United Way WorldwideRaymond James Charita…National Philanthropi…Greater Houston Commu…Servant FoundationThe Blackbaud Giving …The Ayco Charitable F…Morgan Stanley Global…Gs Donor Advised Phil…American Endowment Fo…
Christian Community Foundation IncCO15.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · United Way Worldwide · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Servant Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jonna and Jill Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jonna and Jill Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jonna and Jill Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Jonna and Jill Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $284k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jonna and Jill’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home