Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jones-Smith Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$102k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$46k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$471kAnimals$74kHuman Services$65kRecreation & Sports$44kFood & Nutrition$38kArts & Culture$37kPublic Benefit$34kEducation$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $46k
$4,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIFEHOUSE$45,520
WASHINGTON ALASKAN MALAMUTE ADOPTION LEAGUE$5,280
SIERRA REPERTORY THEATRE$5,038
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$5,000
THE VANCOUVER SYMPHONY$4,240
HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON$4,000
THE ARC SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON$4,000
NORTH COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$4,000
GALES CREEK CAMP FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN WITH DIABETES$4,000
CASA DE ANGELES FOUNDATION$4,000
RIDE AWAY CENTER$3,500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$3,500
ENVIRONMENTAL TRAVELING COMPANIONS$2,500
MERCY SHIPS$1,700
RUDIGER FOUNDATION$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%RIDE AWAY CENTER: $4k → 15%RIDE AWAY CENTER: $4k → 15%RIDE AWAY CENTER: $5k → 14%RIDE AWAY CENTER: $4k → 14%RIDE AWAY CENTER: $4k → 14%RIDE AWAY CENTER: $4k → 14%RIDE AWAY CENTER: $4k → 14%RIDE AWAY CENTER: $3k → 14%RIDE AWAY CENTER: $3k → 14%CASA DE ANGELES FOUNDATION: $4k → 8%CASA DE ANGELES FOUNDATION: $4k → 8%CASA DE ANGELES FOUNDATION: $4k → 8%CASA DE ANGELES FOUNDATION: $4k → 8%CASA DE ANGELES FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%CASA DE ANGELES FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%CASA DE ANGELES FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%CASA DE ANGELES FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%CASA DE ANGELES FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$823k · 24 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +58% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
4

Total granted

$823k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+58%

Still filing today

71%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LI
    LIFEHOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $404k · revenue +172%
  • NC
    North County Community Food Bank
    9× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +7%
  • SR
    SIERRA REPERTORY THEATRE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • VV
    VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA #512
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • AF
    ARRILLAGA FAMILY SPORTS CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • TR
    TUOLUME RIVER PRESERVATION TRUST
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wolfe Ranch Rescue
Animals
2
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
—
3
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
4
A Better Chance International Rescue
—
5
Mendocino Coast Humane Society

Caring for homeless animals, and finding homes for them through pet adoptions.

Animals
6
West Coast Labrador Retriever Rescue

To rescue, rehabilitate and rehome abandoned labrador retrievers, golden retrieversand other retriever breeds. our rescue team saves these dogs from shelters as well as assisting people that need to rehome their dogs.

Animals
7
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals
8
Foothill Dog Rescue of the Sierras

Foothill Dog Rescue is a 100% all volunteer organization dedicated to re-homing dogs from over crowded animal shelters, owner surrenders and underserved communities. We also sponsor vaccine and microchip clinics for our County and have…

Animals
9
The California Wildlife Center

The california wildlife center (cwc) takes responsibility for the protection of all native wildlife through rehabilitiation, education and conservation. as the los angeles area's premier wildlife medical care and rehabilitation facility,…

Health
10
Starfish Animal Rescue
Animals
11
Pacific Rim Rescue

Rescuing dogs and puppies from untenable conditions in countries of the Pacific Rim and owner surrender dogs here at home, transitioning them to healthy, loving and preapproved adoptive homes in North America, elevating them from throwaway…

Animals
12
Monterey Bay Labrador Retriever Rescue Inc

Rescue and rehabilitate unwanted labrador retrievers and place them in loving homes.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vancouver Humane Society and Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals; the most unlike its peers is Casa de Angeles Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
16/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIFEHOUSE INC: $404,205 · OtherLIFEHOUSE INCTHE VANCOUVER SYMPHONY: $26,040 · OtherTHE ARC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON: $24,700 · OtherSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $19,500 · Other+16 more: $91,350 · Other+16 moreWASHINGTON ALASKAN MALAMUTE ADOPTION LEAGUE: $36,405 · AnimalsWASHINGTO…VANCOUVER HUMANE SOCIETY AND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $29,300 · AnimalsVANCOUVER…THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $6,180 · AnimalsTHE MARIN…RIDE AWAY CENTER INC: $34,500 · Human ServicesCasa de Angeles Foundation: $30,000 · Human ServicesNorth County Community Food Bank: $38,400 · Food & NutritionSIERRA REPERTORY THEATRE INC: $37,038 · Arts & CultureEnvironmental Traveling Companions: $27,500 · EnvironmentGALES CREEK CAMP FOUNDATION: $27,200 · Recreation & Sports
Other$565,795Animals$71,885Human Services$64,500Food & Nutrition$38,400Arts & Culture$37,038Environment$27,500Recreation & Sports$27,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFEHOUSE INC: $404,205 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetNorth County Community Food Bank: $38,400 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSIERRA REPERTORY THEATRE INC: $37,038 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetWASHINGTON ALASKAN MALAMUTE ADOPTION LEAGUE: $36,405 over 9y, 4.5% of budgetRIDE AWAY CENTER INC: $34,500 over 9y, 100% of budgetCasa de Angeles Foundation: $30,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetVANCOUVER HUMANE SOCIETY AND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $29,300 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetEnvironmental Traveling Companions: $27,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetGALES CREEK CAMP FOUNDATION: $27,200 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ARC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON: $24,700 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $19,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $14,450 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRUDIGER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetTuolumne River Preservation Trust dba Yosemite Rivers Alliance: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $6,180 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetANGEL ISLAND CONSERVANCY: $4,500 over 9y, 5.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $2,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFEHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds North County Community Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA REPERTORY THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON ALASKAN MALAMUTE ADOPTION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds RIDE AWAY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Casa de Angeles Foundation ↗
  • Who funds VANCOUVER HUMANE SOCIETY AND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Environmental Traveling Companions ↗
  • Who funds GALES CREEK CAMP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds RUDIGER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Tuolumne River Preservation Trust dba Yosemite Rivers Alliance ↗
  • Who funds THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL ISLAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds MARIN ATHLETIC FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jones-Smith Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jones-Smith Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jones-Smith Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jones-Smith Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jones-Smith’s filings →

    More from the funding graph