Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jon and Susan Diamond Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
39
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$378k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$5.3MHealth$1.9MInternational$1.9MReligion$1.4MEducation$696kYouth Development$296kArts & Culture$64kHuman Services$57kOther$0
02FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $256k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+1 grant · $378k
$25,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$41M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLUMBUS JEWISH FEDERATION$377,592
GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FED$200,000
COLUMBUS JEWISH FOUNDATION$153,037
SIX POINT$120,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
TIKVAH FUND JLC$100,000
AIEF$50,000
AFMDA$50,000
AIEF$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
AIEF$50,000
AFMDA$50,000
JEWISHMIAMIORG$50,000
AIEF$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%CHALLENGED ATHLETE: $500 → 11%THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%JEWISH ADOPTION & FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $2k → 13%GRIDIRON GREATS ASSISTANCE FUND INC: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
NC
DC
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.5M · 29 repeat orgs$3.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
87

Total granted

$4.5M
$2.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+35%

Still filing today

66%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $775k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationInternationalReligionHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    6× · 2018–2024 · $594k · revenue +206%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAAGALIM INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $518k · revenue +406% · 40% of their budget
  • CT
    COLUMBUS TORAH ACADEMY
    4× · 2018–2021 · $269k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $360k
  • RO
    ROOT ONEBOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $250k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

2
University of Judaism Foundation
3
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
4
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
5
American Friends of Bar-Ilan University

We fundraise in the u.s. to support, and raise awareness of, bar-ilan university in israel.

Education
6
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
7
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
8
Hebrew Academy of Cleveland

The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…

9
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
10
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
11
Clal-the National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership Inc

A leading advocate for pluralism and diversity, clal offers jewish wisdom that enhances public life, deepens civic engagement and cultivates personal growth.

Religion
12
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is In Christy's Shoes Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Jewish Community Organizati…Military Veterans SupportSchool District FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Sports ProgramsPolicy Research and AdvocacyDomestic Violence ServicesCancer Support ServicesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%48%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/71
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,494

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 136 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/64
Grantees still filing
52/64
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $2,066,813 · PhilanthropyGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INCJewish Federation of Columbus — $1,796,809 · PhilanthropyJewish Federation of ColumbusColumbus Jewish Foundation — $1,054,029 · PhilanthropyColumbus Jewish Foundation+2 more — $115,000 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI HOSPITAL — $1,000,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI HOSPITALJEWISHMIAMIORG — $465,000 · OtherJEWISHMIAMIORGIndividual grant recipient — $360,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $300,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientROOT ONEBOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION INC — $250,000 · OtherROOT ONEBOARD OF JEWISH EDUCATION INCGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FED — $200,272 · OtherSIX POINT FOUNDATION — $200,000 · OtherAIEF — $200,000 · OtherASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL — $200,000 · OtherTIKVAH FUND JLC — $162,500 · Other+86 more — $1,263,599 · Other+86 moreAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $600,180 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $594,200 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAAGALIM INC — $518,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS…+6 more — $154,760 · International+6 moreCOLUMBUS TORAH ACADEMY — $269,000 · EducationSIXPOINT INC — $200,000 · EducationCHICAGO JEWISH DAY SCHOOL — $150,000 · EducationYESHIVA UNIVERSITY — $35,000 · Education+5 more — $21,280 · EducationASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $600,000 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $30,000 · Health+7 more — $39,309 · HealthHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $150,000 · ReligionChabad of Columbus Inc — $50,000 · ReligionMOISHE HOUSE — $21,000 · Religion+3 more — $3,800 · ReligionTAMID ISRAEL INVESTMENT GROUP LTD — $70,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $500 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$5,032,651Other$4,601,371International$1,867,140Education$675,280Health$669,309Religion$224,800Youth Development$70,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $2,066,813 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetJewish Federation of Columbus — $1,796,809 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetColumbus Jewish Foundation — $1,054,029 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $600,180 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $600,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $594,200 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAAGALIM INC — $518,000 over 6y, 40% of budgetCOLUMBUS TORAH ACADEMY — $269,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetSIXPOINT INC — $200,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $150,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHICAGO JEWISH DAY SCHOOL — $150,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSPARK PROGRAM INC — $100,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetTAMID ISRAEL INVESTMENT GROUP LTD — $70,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $58,760 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChabad of Columbus Inc — $50,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF GLOBAL ANTISEMITISM AND POLICY — $33,333 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetTHEATRE ASPEN — $32,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHasidah — $25,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetMOISHE HOUSE — $21,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetATHLETES FOR ISRAEL INC — $18,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMt Sinai Health Care Foundation — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTOURO UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBAR ILAN UNIVERSITY IN ISRAEL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Community Center Of Cincinnati — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOADON KOL CHADASH — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $2,610 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc — $1,800 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Friends of Chabad of Thailand Inc — $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAIMONIDES SHALOM ACADEMY INC — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRIDIRON GREATS ASSISTANCE FUND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHope for Hilltribes Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ISRAEL FOREVER FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC
  • Who funds Jewish Federation of Columbus
  • Who funds Columbus Jewish Foundation
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAAGALIM INC
  • Who funds COLUMBUS TORAH ACADEMY
  • Who funds SIXPOINT INC
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
  • Who funds CHICAGO JEWISH DAY SCHOOL
  • Who funds SPARK PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC
  • Who funds TAMID ISRAEL INVESTMENT GROUP LTD
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
  • Who funds HATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC
  • Who funds Chabad of Columbus Inc
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF GLOBAL ANTISEMITISM AND POLICY
  • Who funds THEATRE ASPEN
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus Jewish FoundationOH23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Jewish Foundation · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Jay and Jean Schottenstein Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Ann and Ari Deshe Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Lori Schottenstein Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Samuel Aba and Sisel Klurman Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Columbus

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jon and Susan Diamond Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Feeding South Florida Inc5% of income from government
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
  • The Aleph Institute Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jon and Susan Diamond Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jon and Susan Diamond Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 136 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph