· Private foundation
Jon and Linda Halbert Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $275k
- $250k+2 grants · $2.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOREST FORWARD | $2,305,000 |
| HARBOR FUND | $575,000 |
| SIDDHAYATAN TIRTH | $125,000 |
| PRISON COMMUNITIES INTERNATIONAL | $50,000 |
| BRIDGE2RWANDA INC | $50,000 |
| TRANSITION RESOURCE ACTION CENTER | $50,000 |
| DALLAS CONTEMPORARY | $15,000 |
| DALLAS FILM SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| PAYNE SPRINGS FIRE-RESCUE | $5,000 |
| CEDAR CREEK VETERANS FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| OAK CLIFF FILM SOCIETY | $2,000 |
| KESSLER NEIGHBORS UNITED | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $202k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFFOREST FORWARD5× · 2021–2025 · $8.1M · revenue +447% · 59% of their budget
- BIBRIDGE2RWANDA INC6× · 2019–2025 · $350k · revenue +42%
- RTREHABILITATION THROUGH THE ARTS INC3× · 2021–2025 · $206k · revenue +26%
Funded once
- PPPHYSICAL PLANT ARTSone grant, 2024 · $80k
- RFRFA FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $33k
INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Artpace san antonio is a nonprofit residency program which supports texas, national, and international artists in the creation of new art. see schedule o for continuation.
The mission of the denver film society is to develop opportunities for diverse audiences to discover film through creative, thought-provoking experiences. we strive to cultivate and celebrate film as an art form; to enrich and expand the…
We are a vibrant cultural hub that provides, operates and activates exceptional spaces for artists, artistic organizations and our community.
Dallas Center for Photography's mission is to serve as a focal point for creators and appreciators of all forms of photography through education, mentorship, exhibitions, and community outreach.
Houston cinema arts society (hcas) celebrates the vitality of houston by connecting audiences and artists with public, educational, and career-advancing film and arts programming. houston cinema arts society envisions a future where…
The dallas tourism public improvement district ("dtpid") is a public improvement district dedicated to improving convention and group hotel bookings and hotel room night consumption in the city of dallas, texas.
The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.
The mission of Texas Public Radio is to engage, inspire and inform, bringing people together to better understand their community and world.
To inspire a more accessible future of art and technology by supporting the voices of todays artists and connecting diverse communities through transformative public art experiences.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Harbor Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FOREST FORWARD ↗
- Who funds CITYSQUARE ↗
- Who funds HARBOR FUND INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE2RWANDA INC ↗
- Who funds REHABILITATION THROUGH THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds TRANSITION RESOURCE ACTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds CEDAR CREEK VETERANS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DALLAS CONTEMPORARY ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DALLAS FILM SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS ACROSS AMERICA ↗
- Who funds HOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds Pegasus Media Project ↗
- Who funds OAK CLIFF FILM SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds The Virginia Hospital Center Foundation ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds KESSLER NEIGHBORS UNITED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jon and Linda Halbert Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.