Skip to content

· Private foundation

John P and Dorothy S Illges Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$676k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$165k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$850kArts & Culture$767kHealth$608kReligion$560kEducation$373kFood & Nutrition$370kCrime & Legal$260kHousing & Shelter$252kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $200k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $476k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRUTH SPRING INC$165,000
NATIONAL INFANTRY FOUNDATION$140,750
ST LUKE SCHOOL$120,000
SAFEHOUSE MINISTRIES$50,000
WYNNTON NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORK$25,000
MERCYMED OF COLUMBUS$25,000
CALVARY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$25,000
WEST CENTRAL GEORGIA FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$25,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$20,000
COLUMBUS HOSPICE$20,000
HOUSE OF HEROES$15,000
HISTORIC LINWOOD FOUNDATION$15,000
YOUNG LIFE$10,000
COLUMBUS TECHNICAL COLLEGE$10,000
COLUMBUS REGIONAL TENNIS ASSOCIATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30k → 36%WHOLESOME WAVE GEORGIA: $20k → 14%NATIONAL INFANTRY MUSEUM: $186k → 18%PIEDMONT COLUMBUS REGIONAL FOUNDATION: $241k → 18%NATIONAL INFANTRY FOUNDATION: $141k → 18%PIEDMONT COLUMBUS REGIONAL FOUNDATION: $134k → 18%National Infantry Foundation: $50k → 18%PIEDMONT COLUMBUS REGIONAL FOUNDATION: $125k → 18%GIRLS INC: $30k → 18%PIEDMONT COLUMBUS REGIONAL FOUNDATION: $100k → 18%HISTORIC WESTVILLE: $25k → 18%PIEDMONT COLUMBUS REGIONAL FOUNDATION: $100k → 18%Historic Westville: $25k → 18%PIEDMONT COLUMBUS REGIONAL FOUNDATION: $100k → 18%THE COLUMBUS MUSEUM INC: $187k → 18%PIEDMONT COLUMBUS REGIONAL FOUNDATION: $50k → 18%THE COLUMBUS MUSEUM INC: $113k → 18%WYNNTON NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORK: $25k → 18%MERCYMED OF COLUMBUS: $184k → 18%TRUTH SPRING INC: $165k → 18%SAFEHOUSE MINISTRIES: $150k → 18%MERCYMED OF COLUMBUS: $75k → 18%MERCYMED OF COLUMBUS: $66k → 18%Brookstone School: $50k → 18%SAFEHOUSE MINISTRIES: $50k → 18%Valley Rescue Mission Inc: $27k → 18%MERCYMED OF COLUMBUS: $25k → 18%MERCYMED OF COLUMBUS: $25k → 18%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $20k → 18%American Red Cross: $20k → 18%ST LUKE SCHOOL: $120k → 18%MICAH'S PROMISE: $110k → 18%MICAH'S PROMISE: $99k → 18%MICAH'S PROMISE: $51k → 18%Teen Challenge: $40k → 18%SPRINGER OPERA HOUSE: $25k → 18%COLUMBUS BOTANICAL GARDENS: $104k → 18%Easter Seals: $63k → 18%EASTER SEALS: $57k → 18%COLUMBUS BOTANICAL GARDENS: $50k → 18%FEEDING THE VALLEY: $50k → 18%COLUMBUS BOTANICAL GARDENS: $50k → 18%COLUMBUS BOTANICAL GARDENS: $46k → 18%CALVARY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $40k → 18%CALVARY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $25k → 18%COLUMBUS HOSPICE: $20k → 18%COLUMBUS STATE UNIVERSITY: $80k → 18%Columbus State University: $80k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 20 repeat orgs$873k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
15

Total granted

$3.8M
$503k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-11%
-9%

Still filing today

55%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $370k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHealthFood & NutritionEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MERCYMED OF COLUMBUS INC ATTN TONY NGUYEN
    5× · 2019–2025 · $375k · revenue +114%
  • FT
    Feeding the Valley Inc
    3× · 2019–2024 · $350k · revenue +843%
  • NI
    NATIONAL INFANTRY MUSEUM FOUNDATIONINC
    2× · 2017–2025 · $191k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • NI
    NATIONAL INFANTRY MUSEUM
    one grant, 2024 · $186k
  • BS
    BROOKSTONE SCHOOL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +27%
  • TC
    Teen Challenge
    one grant, 2017 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Shelter Board

The community shelter board is ending homelessness by creating collaborations, innovating solutions, and investing in quality programs.

—
2
Columbus Zoological Park Association

Empowering people. saving wildlife.

Animals
3
Pets Without Parents Columbus

To be a resource as a no-kill pet rescue service

Animals
4
Columbus Regional Shelter for Victims of Domestic Violence

To work towards the prevention and elimination of domestic and dating violence.

—
5
Columbus Neighborhood Health Center Inc

To serve the central ohio community with affordable, easy to access healthcare services.

Health
6
Wayne County Humane Society

Finding committed, permanent homes for companion animals in our community; measurably reducing companion animal overpopulation; educating and promoting humane values.

Animals
7
Chattahoochee Hospice Inc

The organization pledges to provide quality programs, service, and technology to meet the unique physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of the terminally ill and their families, and to educate the community about end of life issues.

Human Services
8
Colony Retirement Homes Iii Inc

Colony retirement homes iii is dedicated to providing affordable housing for seniors of low and moderate income.

—
9
Columbus Alliance for Battered Women Inc dba Hope Harbour

Columbus alliance for battered women provides emergency shelter, security, crisis intervention, and advocacy for adult and child victims of domestic violence.

Human Services
10
For Columbus

To inspire, gather, and activate followers of jesus to pursue the common good in our city.

Human Services
11
Hospice of Southern West Virginia Inc

To serve the needs of individuals suffering from life-limiting illness as well as to serve the individuals caring for them. to place emphasis on comfort and quality of life while fulfilling the physical, psychological, social and spiritual…

—
12
Chattanooga Regional Homeless Coalition Inc

To advocate for people who are homless or near homeless, strategically planning for housing and services in the community, maximizing resources and collaboarating with community partners to implement housing and services within the…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Southern Georgia Inc; the most unlike its peers is Historic Westville. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
11/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PIEDMONT COLUMBUS REGIONAL FOUNDATION: $850,000 · OtherPIEDMONT COLUMBUS REGIONAL FOUNDATIONHIGHLAND COMMUNITY CHURCH: $350,000 · OtherHIGHLAND COMMUNITY CHURCHSAFEHOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $210,000 · OtherSAFEHOUSE MINISTRIES INCNATIONAL INFANTRY MUSEUM: $185,772 · OtherNATIONAL INFANTRY MUSEUMColumbus State University: $160,000 · OtherColumbus State UniversityST LUKE SCHOOL: $120,000 · Other+24 more: $695,365 · Other+24 moreTHE COLUMBUS MUSEUM INC: $300,000 · Arts & CultureTHE COLUMBUS M…NATIONAL INFANTRY MUSEUM FOUNDATIONINC: $190,750 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL INFAN…HISTORIC WESTVILLE: $50,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC WESTV…SPRINGER OPERA HOUSE ARTS ASSOCIATIONINC: $25,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $15,000 · Arts & CultureMERCYMED OF COLUMBUS INC ATTN TONY NGUYEN: $375,000 · HealthMERCYMED OF…EASTER SEALS SOUTHERN GEORGIA INC: $120,000 · HealthEASTER SEAL…Feeding the Valley Inc: $350,000 · Food & NutritionWHOLESOME WAVE GEORGIA INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionMICAH'S PROMISE INC: $260,000 · Crime & LegalTHE COLUMBUS BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $250,000 · EnvironmentTRUTH SPRING INC: $165,000 · Community Improvement
Other$2,571,137Arts & Culture$580,750Health$495,000Food & Nutrition$370,000Crime & Legal$260,000Environment$250,000Community Improvement$165,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMERCYMED OF COLUMBUS INC ATTN TONY NGUYEN: $375,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetFeeding the Valley Inc: $350,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetTHE COLUMBUS MUSEUM INC: $300,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetMICAH'S PROMISE INC: $260,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetTHE COLUMBUS BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $250,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetNATIONAL INFANTRY MUSEUM FOUNDATIONINC: $190,750 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetEASTER SEALS SOUTHERN GEORGIA INC: $120,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHISTORIC WESTVILLE: $50,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetColumbus Housing Initiative Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBROOKSTONE SCHOOL INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHouse of Heroes Chattahoochee: $33,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS HOSPICE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPRINGER OPERA HOUSE ARTS ASSOCIATIONINC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWYNNTON NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetWHOLESOME WAVE GEORGIA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCOLUMBUS REGIONAL TENNIS ASSN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS Humane Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE STEWART COMMUNITY HOME INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTEEN ADVISORS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetANIMAL ARK RESCUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MERCYMED OF COLUMBUS INC ATTN TONY NGUYEN ↗
  • Who funds Feeding the Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE COLUMBUS MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds MICAH'S PROMISE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COLUMBUS BOTANICAL GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL INFANTRY MUSEUM FOUNDATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds TRUTH SPRING INC ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS SOUTHERN GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC WESTVILLE ↗
  • Who funds Columbus Housing Initiative Inc ↗
  • Who funds BROOKSTONE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds House of Heroes Chattahoochee ↗
  • Who funds AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGER OPERA HOUSE ARTS ASSOCIATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds WYNNTON NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds WHOLESOME WAVE GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC LINWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS REGIONAL TENNIS ASSN INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds PAWS Humane Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE STEWART COMMUNITY HOME INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley IncGA48.5× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley Inc · The Jordan Foundation Inc · Jw & Ethel I Woodruff Foundation Inc · Bradley-Turner Foundation Inc · Lockwood Partners Foundation Inc · Beloco Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · The Daniel P Amos Family Foundation · Swift Illges Foundation Inc · The Cms Foundation Inc · Mildred Miller Fort Foundation Inc · The Woodruff Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John P and Dorothy S Illges Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John P and Dorothy S Illges Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John P and Dorothy S Illges Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to John P and Dorothy S Illges Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John P and Dorothy S Illges’ filings →

    More from the funding graph