Skip to content

· Private foundation

John Luther McLean & Isabelle Gray McLean Trust

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$270k
Granted FY2022
24
Grants FY2022
7
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Philanthropy$631kReligion$76kEducation$65kAnimals$58kHealth$54kFood & Nutrition$53kHuman Services$42kPublic Safety & Disaster$33kOther$0
02FY2022 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k21 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $190k
$3,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF ROBESON$105,000
VARIOUS$84,550
EMPTY STOCKING FUND$10,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS$7,500
CAPE FEAR COUNCIL BSA$6,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,250
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
RCC FOUNDATION$5,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$4,000
JESSIE HELMS CENTER FOUNDATION$3,500
BOYS & GIRLS HOME OF NC$3,500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$3,500
AMERICAN RED CROSS$3,500
SRMC FOUNDATION$2,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%BOYS & GIRLS HOME OF NC: $4k → 21%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%BOYS & GIRLS HOME OF NC: $4k → 21%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%BOYS & GIRLS HOME OF NC: $4k → 21%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%BOYS & GIRLS HOME OF NC: $4k → 21%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%BOYS & GIRLS HOME OF NC: $4k → 21%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%BOYS & GIRLS HOME OF NC: $4k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IN
PA
CA
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 30 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2022, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
0

Total granted

$1.6M
$0

Still filing today

37%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentEducationAnimalsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    6× · 2017–2022 · $25k · revenue +46%
  • TJ
    THE JESSE HELMS CENTER FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $21k · revenue +65%
  • SA
    SOUTHEASTERN ACADEMY INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +62%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    The Rubicon Foundation
    Philanthropy
    2
    House of Refuge Faith Based
    Human Services
    3
    Robeson Health Care Corporation

    Providing primary health care and professional counseling services to all indviduals who need it.

    Health
    4
    Christian Foundation
    —
    5
    Reformed Church Ministries to the Aging the Particular Synod of Mid-Atlantics

    The mission of the reformed church ministries to the aging, the regional synod of the mid-atlantics ("rch"), is "committed to the compassionate care of our elders in a spiritual environment". our commission and priority is to serve the…

    Human Services
    6
    Rustys Rescue Ranch Inc

    Rescuing dogs from kill shelters in North Carolina

    Animals
    7
    Robinson House Foundation
    Community Improvement
    8
    R Foundation
    Philanthropy
    9
    Louisiana United Methodist Children & Family Services Inc

    The organization seeks to provide the highest quality of care in ministry to the diverse needs of louisiana's children and families by offering a variety of holistic services which promote personal growth and wholesome family life. the…

    Human Services
    10
    Frederick Rugby
    Recreation & Sports
    11
    Historic Charleston Foundation

    The mission of historic charleston foundation is to advocate for a future for charleston that honors and protects its people, places, culture, and community.

    —
    12
    Rudge Foundation
    Philanthropy
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Team Rubicon Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rcc Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    4
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    11/13
    Grantees still filing
    8/13
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    UNITED WAY OF ROBESON: $630,500 · OtherUNITED WAY OF ROBESONVARIOUS: $435,850 · OtherVARIOUSEMPTY STOCKING FUND: $52,500 · Other+19 more: $337,900 · Other+19 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $24,500 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS HOMES OF NC INC: $21,000 · Human ServicesRCC FOUNDATION: $30,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JESSE HELMS CENTER FOUNDATION: $21,000 · Youth DevelopmentSOUTHEASTERN ACADEMY INC: $15,000 · EducationROBESON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $8,250 · AnimalsSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $7,500 · ReligionTEAM RUBICON INC: $6,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
    Other$1,456,750Human Services$45,500Philanthropy$30,000Youth Development$21,000Education$15,000Animals$8,250Religion$7,500Public Safety & Disaster$6,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRCC FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 6y, 59% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $24,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $21,250 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetTHE JESSE HELMS CENTER FOUNDATION: $21,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS HOMES OF NC INC: $21,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLUMBERTON CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER INC: $15,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN ACADEMY INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUMAR SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PRESBYTERIAN FOUNDATION OF COLUMBUS INDIANA: $12,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetROBESON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $8,250 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds RCC FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
    • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
    • Who funds THE JESSE HELMS CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS HOMES OF NC INC ↗
    • Who funds LUMBERTON CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds SOUTHEASTERN ACADEMY INC ↗
    • Who funds UMAR SERVICES INC ↗
    • Who funds THE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds THE PRESBYTERIAN FOUNDATION OF COLUMBUS INDIANA ↗
    • Who funds ROBESON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
    • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
    • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization John Luther McLean & Isabelle Gray McLean Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John Luther McLean & Isabelle Gray McLean Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to John Luther McLean & Isabelle Gray McLean Trust?

      Find your warmest path to John Luther McLean & Isabelle Gray McLean Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on John Luther McLean & Isabelle Gray McLean’s filings →

      More from the funding graph