Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

John Luther McLean & Isabelle Gray McLean Trust

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$270k
Granted FY2022
24
Grants FY2022
7
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 92% of JOHN LUTHER MCLEAN & ISABELLE GRAY MCLEAN TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2022 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k21 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $190k
$3,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF ROBESON$105,000
VARIOUS$84,550
EMPTY STOCKING FUND$10,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS$7,500
CAPE FEAR COUNCIL BSA$6,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,250
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
RCC FOUNDATION$5,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$4,000
JESSIE HELMS CENTER FOUNDATION$3,500
BOYS & GIRLS HOME OF NC$3,500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$3,500
AMERICAN RED CROSS$3,500
SRMC FOUNDATION$2,700
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%BOYS & GIRLS HOME OF NC: $4k → 21%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%BOYS & GIRLS HOME OF NC: $4k → 21%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%BOYS & GIRLS HOME OF NC: $4k → 21%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%BOYS & GIRLS HOME OF NC: $4k → 21%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%BOYS & GIRLS HOME OF NC: $4k → 21%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%BOYS & GIRLS HOME OF NC: $4k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
IN
PA
CA
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 30 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

30 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2022, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
0

Total granted

$1.6M
$0

Still filing today

37%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentEducationAnimalsReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    6× · 2017–2022 · $25k · revenue +46%
  • TJ
    THE JESSE HELMS CENTER FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $21k · revenue +65%
  • TV
    THE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $15k · revenue +150%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    The Rubicon Foundation
    Philanthropy
    2
    House of Refuge Faith Based
    Human Services
    3
    Robeson Health Care Corporation

    Providing primary health care and professional counseling services to all indviduals who need it.

    Health
    4
    Christian Foundation
    5
    Reformed Church Ministries to the Aging the Particular Synod of Mid-Atlantics

    The mission of the reformed church ministries to the aging, the regional synod of the mid-atlantics ("rch"), is "committed to the compassionate care of our elders in a spiritual environment". our commission and priority is to serve the…

    Human Services
    6
    Rustys Rescue Ranch Inc

    Rescuing dogs from kill shelters in North Carolina

    Animals
    7
    Robinson House Foundation
    Community Improvement
    8
    R Foundation
    Philanthropy
    9
    Louisiana United Methodist Children & Family Services Inc

    The organization seeks to provide the highest quality of care in ministry to the diverse needs of louisiana's children and families by offering a variety of holistic services which promote personal growth and wholesome family life. the…

    Human Services
    10
    Frederick Rugby
    Recreation & Sports
    11
    Historic Charleston Foundation

    The mission of historic charleston foundation is to advocate for a future for charleston that honors and protects its people, places, culture, and community.

    12
    Rudge Foundation
    Philanthropy

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Team Rubicon Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rcc Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    4
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    11/13
    Grantees still filing
    8/13
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    UNITED WAY OF ROBESON — $630,500 · OtherUNITED WAY OF ROBESONVARIOUS — $435,850 · OtherVARIOUSEMPTY STOCKING FUND — $52,500 · Other+19 more — $337,900 · Other+19 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $24,500 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS HOMES OF NC INC — $21,000 · Human ServicesRCC FOUNDATION — $30,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JESSE HELMS CENTER FOUNDATION — $21,000 · Youth DevelopmentSOUTHEASTERN ACADEMY INC — $15,000 · EducationROBESON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $8,250 · AnimalsSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $7,500 · ReligionTEAM RUBICON INC — $6,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
    Other$1,456,750Human Services$45,500Philanthropy$30,000Youth Development$21,000Education$15,000Animals$8,250Religion$7,500Public Safety & Disaster$6,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRCC FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 6y, 59% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $24,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $21,250 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS HOMES OF NC INC — $21,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JESSE HELMS CENTER FOUNDATION — $21,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLUMBERTON CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER INC — $15,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN ACADEMY INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUMAR SERVICES INC — $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PRESBYTERIAN FOUNDATION OF COLUMBUS INDIANA — $12,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetROBESON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $8,250 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC — $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds RCC FOUNDATION
    • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS HOMES OF NC INC
    • Who funds THE JESSE HELMS CENTER FOUNDATION
    • Who funds THE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC
    • Who funds LUMBERTON CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER INC
    • Who funds SOUTHEASTERN ACADEMY INC
    • Who funds UMAR SERVICES INC
    • Who funds THE PRESBYTERIAN FOUNDATION OF COLUMBUS INDIANA
    • Who funds ROBESON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization John Luther McLean & Isabelle Gray McLean Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to John Luther McLean & Isabelle Gray McLean Trust?

      Find your warmest path to John Luther McLean & Isabelle Gray McLean Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph