How much did JOHN J WINCH FAMILY FOUNDATION grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 53% of JOHN J WINCH FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

childrens

2020

dayton children's

2021

dayton children's

2022

foreverdayton children's

2023

forever

2025

foreverlake

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k19 grants · $38k
$10k–50k5 grants · $55k

$2,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.2M

Total assets

Largest grants

CLEAR LAKE TOWNSHIP LAND CONSERVANCY$15,000
OHIO'S HOSPICE$10,000
HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION$10,000
LINDNER CENTER OF HOPE$10,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$10,000
GRAND LAKE HEALTHPREMIER HEALTH NORTH YMCA BRANCH$5,000
SAINT AUGUSTINE CHURCH$5,000
DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$5,000
VILLAGE OF MINSTER RESCUE SQUAD$2,000
DAYTON PERFORMING ARTS ALLIANCE$2,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$2,000
VILLAGE OF MINSTER FIRE DEPARTMENT$2,000
DAYBREAK INC$2,000
NATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL$2,000
HOUSE OF BREAD$2,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 12%. 97% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$505k · 35 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$505k

$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%

+74%

Still filing today

49%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION
8× · 2018–2025 · $60k · revenue +229%
HO
HOSPICE OF DAYTON FOUNDATION
6× · 2018–2023 · $51k · revenue +26%
CL
CLEAR LAKE TOWNSHIP LAND CONSERVANCY
5× · 2021–2025 · $33k · revenue +219%

Funded once

ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITALgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +74%
PF
PHEASANTS FOREVER
one grant, 2021 · $1k
AA
ALS ASSOCIATON CENTRAL & SOUTHERN OHIO CHAPTER
one grant, 2017 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

OhioHealth Corporation

Our mission is to improve the health of those we serve.

Health

The Dayton Foundation

See schedule o for organization mission statementthe dayton foundation was established in 1921 as a community foundation to meet the changing needs and improve the quality of life in the dayton/miami valley region and serves as a vehicle…

Philanthropy

Hospice of Dayton Inc

To provide hospice and palliative care for the terminally ill and support for their families.

Human Services

Dayton Automobile

Arts & Culture

Kettering Medical Center

To improve the quality of life of the people in the communities we serve through healthcare

Health

Children's Home Care of Dayton

To provide quality home health services to infants, children and young adults. the care provided will meet the physical, emotional and spirtual needs of children and their families.

Health

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic

Advancing health through research, education, clinical practice, and community partnerships; providing each person the best care in the right place, at the right time, every time.

Health

Dayton Osteopathic Hospital

Our mission is to live god's love by promoting and restoring health.

Health

University of Dayton

The university of dayton is a top-tier catholic research university with academic offerings from the undergraduate to the doctoral levels. we are a diverse community committed, in the marianist tradition, to educating the whole person and…

Education

The Dayton Bar Foundation

—

Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce

The dayton area chamber of commerce is formed to be the leading advocate for business in the dayton and miami valley regional area and strive to maximize business profitability of its members by providing: professional development,…

—

Dayton Society of Natural History

The mission of the dayton society of natural history is to create and provide meaningful and entertaining learning experiences for curious minds to engage with natural history, science, and nature while honoring and preserving collections…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ohio's Hospice Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Dayton Children's Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/21

the rest of the field

6,875/74,285

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

20/21

Grantees still filing

18/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$279,500Health$118,500Human Services$64,000Environment$35,000Food & Nutrition$14,000Arts & Culture$12,500Recreation & Sports$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dayton Foundation DepositoryOH24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dayton Foundation Depository · The Dayton Foundation · Dayton Foundation Plus Inc · The Berry Family Foundation · Dayton Foundation Charitable · Mathile Family Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · The Dayton Power and Light Company · Virginia W Kettering Foundation Xxxxx3003 · Miami Valley Hospital · The United Way of the Greater Dayton · The Troy Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JOHN J WINCH FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SOUTHSIDE CLUB.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 310904161 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on SOUTHSIDE CLUB, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to John J Winch Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to John J Winch Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JOHN J WINCH FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to John J Winch Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

JOHN J WINCH FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to John J Winch Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph