Skip to content

· Private foundation

John J Flemm Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$160k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

International$167kHealth$163kReligion$67kEducation$28kArts & Culture$14kPhilanthropy$6kAnimals$6kCivil Rights$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $73k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HACKENSACK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$50,000
CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL$33,000
CONGREGATION AHAVATH TORAH$16,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EZRA MIZION$14,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,750
HATZALAH OF ROCKAWAY AND FIVE TOWNS$3,000
CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM$3,000
TOMCHEI SHABBOS FIVE TOWNS$3,000
MORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD$2,000
EMUNAH OF AMERICA INC$2,000
KAPLEN JCC ON THE PALISADES$2,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF NNJ$2,000
LONG BEACH ART LEAGUE INC$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 14% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CONGREGATION AHAVATH TORAH: $16k → 10%LONG BEACH ART LEAGUE INC: $3k → 6%TOMCHEI SHABBOS FIVE TOWNS: $3k → 13%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EZRA MIZION: $22k → 20%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $2k → 18%HALACHIC ORGAN DONOR SOCIETY: $3k → 14%KAPLEN JCC ON THE PALISADES: $2k → 7%CONGREGATION AHAVATH TORAH: $7k → 10%LONG BEACH ART LEAGUE INC: $3k → 6%TOMCHEI SHABBOS FIVE TOWNS: $3k → 13%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EZRA MIZION: $22k → 20%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $2k → 18%HALACHIC ORGAN DONOR SOCIETY: $3k → 14%THE IDEA SCHOOL: $2k → 7%CONGREGATION AHAVATH TORAH: $7k → 10%MANHATTAN HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $7k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EZRA MIZION: $14k → 20%HATZALAH OF ROCKAWAY AND FIVE TOWNS: $3k → 6%MANHATTAN HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $3k → 17%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $2k → 28%HATZALAH OF ROCKAWAY AND FIVE TOWNS: $3k → 6%SEE SCH # 1: $175k → 7%HATZALAH OF ROCKAWAY AND FIVE TOWNS: $3k → 6%SEE SCH # 1: $144k → 7%MANHATTAN DAY SCHOOL: $6k → 17%SEE SCH # 1: $131k → 7%SEE SCH # 1: $125k → 7%SEE SCH # 2: $119k → 7%MANHATTAN DAY SCHOOL: $3k → 17%HACKENSACK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%HACKENSACK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%FIFTH AVE SYNAGOGUE: $5k → 17%HACKENSACK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%EMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $2k → 17%CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL: $33k → 7%EMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $2k → 17%CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL: $30k → 7%EMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $2k → 17%CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL: $30k → 7%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND: $10k → 17%CONGREGATION KEHILAS JESHURUN: $5k → 7%CONGREGATION BETH JACOB OAKLAND: $3k → 7%ARTWORKS - NAOMI COHAIN FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 7%CONGREGATION B'NAI JEHUDA: $2k → 7%CONGREGATION B'NAI JEHUDA: $2k → 7%MORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD: $2k → 7%CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM: $3k → 7%CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM: $3k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 30 repeat orgs$141k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
6

Total granted

$1.0M
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+11%

Still filing today

30%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationHealthAnimalsCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    Central Fund of Israel
    3× · 2023–2025 · $92k · revenue +31%
  • MS
    MORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD
    3× · 2023–2025 · $6k · revenue +18%
  • TH
    The Halachic Organ Donor Society Inc DBA Ematai
    2× · 2023–2024 · $6k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • SS
    SEE SCH # 2
    one grant, 2018 · $119k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH JACOB OAKLAND
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • TI
    THE IDEA SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Ohr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel

Ohr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel Incs mission is to illuminate authentic Torah Judaism in Israel and the diaspora. This Modern Orthodox movement is shaping Jewish communities worldwide, fueled by a comprehensive educational network,…

Religion
3
Moskowitz Prize for Zionism Inc
—
4
Society for the Welfare of Israeli Underprivileged Gifted Children

To provide educational assistance to underprivileged gifted children in israel.

International
5
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
6
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
7
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
8
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
9
Yeshivas Nachlas Sofrim Inc

To cultivate students' intellectual, moral and creative capacities to the fullest by transmitting the necessary skills and methods that enable students to master all areas of torah scholarship.

Religion
10
Torah Ore Seminary

To promote the furtherance of jewish religious and rabbinic education on a college and graduate level in israel and to increase the dissemination of scholarly research works in the fields of torah, talmud and halacha.

Education
11
Ezreinu Inc
Health
12
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emunah of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SEE SCH # 1: $574,500 · OtherSEE SCH # 1HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH INC: $150,500 · OtherHACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH INCSEE SCH # 2: $119,400 · OtherSEE SCH # 2AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EZRA MIZION: $57,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF EZRA MIZION+27 more: $132,750 · Other+27 moreCentral Fund of Israel: $92,000 · InternationalCentral F…EMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $6,000 · InternationalEMUNAH OF…+1 more: $1,500 · InternationalPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyProject Ezrah Needs Inc: $1,500 · PhilanthropyMORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD: $6,000 · EducationTHE IDEA SCHOOL INC: $2,000 · EducationThe Halachic Organ Donor Society Inc DBA Ematai: $6,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $1,000 · HealthSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $4,000 · Crime & LegalSAVE OUR SEABIRDS INC: $2,500 · AnimalsWildlife Conservation Society: $1,000 · Animals
Other$1,034,150International$99,500Philanthropy$11,500Education$8,000Health$7,000Crime & Legal$4,000Animals$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $92,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Halachic Organ Donor Society Inc DBA Ematai: $6,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE OUR SEABIRDS INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE IDEA SCHOOL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMIT CHILDREN INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetProject Ezrah Needs Inc: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds MORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD ↗
  • Who funds EMUNAH OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Halachic Organ Donor Society Inc DBA Ematai ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE OUR SEABIRDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE IDEA SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMIT CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Ezrah Needs Inc ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY18.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Lee and Cheryl Lasher Family Foundation Inc · Fjc · H&H Charitable Foundation · M D Katz Foundation Inc · The Arthur & Joyce Fein Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc · Cross River Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John J Flemm Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John J Flemm Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John J Flemm Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to John J Flemm Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John J Flemm’s filings →

    More from the funding graph