· Private foundation
H&H Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k37 grants · $60k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $111k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $118k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RELIGIOUS ZIONIST B'NAI AKIVA | $118,003 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL | $27,500 |
| AMIT CHILDREN | $26,179 |
| AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK MEDICAL CENTER IN JERUSALEM | $18,000 |
| ETZION FOUNDATION | $18,000 |
| KEDMA | $11,381 |
| SHARSHERET | $10,000 |
| FERNANDO PULLUM COMMUNITY ARTS CENTER | $7,500 |
| CENTRAL FUND FOR ISRAEL | $5,960 |
| JGIVE-FRIENDS OF ASOR FUND USA INC | $5,530 |
| CONGREGATION BROTHERS OF ISRAEL | $5,480 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| SHALOM TASK FORCE | $3,600 |
| FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH | $2,500 |
| SINAI SCHOOLS | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 7% of H&H Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 24% of the giving stays in NJ; read by stated purpose it is 26% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
66 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACAMIT CHILDREN INC8× · 2017–2024 · $278k · revenue +134%
- EFETZION FOUNDATION INC co H SILVERA8× · 2017–2024 · $153k · revenue +101%
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC3× · 2022–2024 · $76k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- RZRELIGIOUS ZIONIST MOVEMENT BNEI AKIVAone grant, 2021 · $61k
- EDEFRAT DEVELOPMENT FUNDone grant, 2023 · $11k
- NMNY MEDICAL COLLEGEone grant, 2017 · $9k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.
To further jewish education in israel
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
To promote, benefit, and support jewish educational activities in israel
To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs
To voluntarily assist the house of religious learning known as yeshiva neveh zion in israel
The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.
To promote, assist, and sponsor the spreading of Jewish religious education in Israel. The organization will also organize inspirational gatherings in the USA to enhance the participants' Torah knowledge.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emunah of America Inc and the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 134 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMIT CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds ETZION FOUNDATION INC co H SILVERA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds MESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ERETZ HEMDAH ↗
- Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
- Who funds Sharsheret Inc ↗
- Who funds SHALOM TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds Project Ezrah Needs Inc ↗
- Who funds FERNANDO PULLUM COMMUNITY ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC ↗
- Who funds TOMCHEI SHABBOS OF BERGEN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds EMUNAH OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds JGIVE-FRIENDS OF ASOR FUND USA INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC ↗
- Who funds MOSDOS PNEI MENACHEM INC ↗
- Who funds American Friends of Migdal OHR ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc · David & Esther Muschel Foundation · Cross River Community Foundation · M D Katz Foundation Inc · George and Ellen Friedman Family Foundation · The Arthur & Joyce Fein Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Daniel E and Joyce G Straus Family Foundation · Kolatch Family Foundation · The Kahan Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization H&H Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bergen Family Center — 25% of income from government
- Sharsheret Inc — 4% of income from government
- Heichal Hatorah — 1% of income from government
- Mesorah Heritage Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Center for Food Action in New Jersey — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.