How much did JOHN E & NELLIE J BASTIEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 60% of JOHN E & NELLIE J BASTIEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

distresschildren'spalm beachjunior achievementdisordersblind

2021

tornado reliefchildren'sflorida'sjunior achievementpalm beachblind

2022

children'sdogspawspalm beachjunior achievementblind

2023

dogpalm beachdogspawsblind

2024

keysdogspawsblinddream

2025

keysdogspawsdream

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 111 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k103 grants · $479k
$10k–50k8 grants · $91k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$15M

Total assets

Largest grants

PLACE OF HOPE$16,000
QUANTUM HOUSE$15,000
DOGS INC$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
PALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY$10,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$10,000
K9S FOR WARRIORS$10,000
FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA$10,000
ANN NORTON SCULPTURE GARDENS$8,000
BREAD OF THE MIGHTY FOOD BANK$7,500
UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF BROWARD$7,500
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$7,500
TRUSTBRIDGE HOSPICE FOUNDATION$7,500
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF S FLORIDA$5,000
JACK JILL CHILDRENS CENTER$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $256k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.6M · 162 repeat orgs$252k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

162 repeat relationships — 101 still active in FY2025, 61 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

162

Total granted

$2.6M

$212k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%

+7%

Still filing today

42%

23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionReligionAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

QH
QUANTUM HOUSE
6× · 2020–2025 · $79k · revenue +130%
FS
FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA
6× · 2020–2025 · $77k · revenue +55%
PO
PLACE OF HOPE
5× · 2020–2025 · $66k · revenue +102%

Funded once

HC
HOLY CROSS HOSPITALgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +26%
PO
PLACE OF HOPE PBG CAMPUS
one grant, 2023 · $14k
SC
SYLVESTER COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CTR
one grant, 2024 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

South Florida Guardianship Program

The organization's mission is to provide pro bono guardianship services and care management to indigent individuals with disabling conditions.

Health

Catholic Palliative Care Services Inc

Provides responsive end-of-life care to patients and families in broward and miami-dade counties.

—

Lighthouse for the Blind of the Palm Beaches Inc

Lighthouse for the blind of the palm beaches, inc's mission is to assist persons with visual impairments to develop their capabilities to the fullest and to utilize them in the pursuits of life which are the right and privilege of all.

—

Children's Case Management Organization

Families first of palm beach county's mission is empowering families of all histories and challenges to grow strong in every way. strong empowered families create healthy, resilient homes and communities for generations to come.

Environment

Family Nurturing Center of Florida

To provide a nurturing environment for families impacted by divorce, custody battles, and domestic violence, by keeping children safe during these challenging times and helping parents foster positive relationships with their children.

Crime & Legal

Easter Seals South Florida Inc

Provide programs and services that support and strengthen families livingwith disability in miami dade and broward counties.

Health

Florida Healthy Kids Corporation

To ensure the availability of child-centered health plans that provide comprehensive, quality healthcare services, healthy kids coverage include doctors visits, immunizations, dental care, emergency care, hospital stays and much more.

Health

Deliver the Dream Inc

A retreat program that enables families who are experiencing serious illness or crisis to regain strength, mend spirits and just be families and kids again.

Health

Speak Up for Kids of

To mitigate the trauma and cultivate the self-worth of kids living in foster care in palm beach county.

Human Services

Family Resource Center of South Florida

The organization prevents and changes dysfunctional parent-child interaction patterns, promotes positive self-concepts, and builds healthy family relationships.

Crime & Legal

The Florida Center for Early Childhood

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services

Suncoast Humane Societyinc

Our mission is to encourage, honor and support the human-animal bond in the suncoastregion of florida. our vision is to celebrate a community whose pets are safe andloved. suncoast humane society provides sheltering, prevention and…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids in Distress Inc and the most unlike its peers is World Central Kitchen Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/88

the rest of the field

14%

14,580/102,956

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

87 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

86/87

Grantees still filing

69/87

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,804,500Health$368,500Human Services$293,500Education$168,000Food & Nutrition$120,000Animals$47,500Public Benefit$39,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Batchelor Foundation IncFL51× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Palm Beach And · United Way of Palm Beach County Inc · Quantum Foundation Inc · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation · Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Broward Inc · Children's Healthcare Charity Inc · Ibis Charities Foundation Inc · The Chamber of Nonprofit Health and · The Frederick a Deluca Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JOHN E & NELLIE J BASTIEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

14get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ADOPT-A-FAMILY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~79 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 2 filed years.

Track record & reputation

high risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 852197668 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ADOPT-A-FAMILY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 79 months of cash on hand.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 57% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to John E & Nellie J Bastien Memorial Foundation?

Find your warmest path to John E & Nellie J Bastien Memorial Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JOHN E & NELLIE J BASTIEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

87 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to John E & Nellie J Bastien Memorial Foundation?

More from the funding graph

JOHN E & NELLIE J BASTIEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

87 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to John E & Nellie J Bastien Memorial Foundation?

More from the funding graph