Skip to content

· Private foundation

John & Virginia Hankison Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$236k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$1.1MArts & Culture$245kEducation$115kHealth$38kEnvironment$27kPublic Benefit$1kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $81k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $155k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOLEDO ZOO FOUNDATION$45,000
THE TOLEDO SYMPHONY$20,000
WOOD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
BACK TO THE WILD$10,000
TEDDY'S RESCUE INC$10,000
NATURES NURSERY$10,000
TOLEDO ANIMAL RESCUE$10,000
THE WILDS$10,000
MAUMEE VALLEY SAVE A PET$10,000
ASSISTANCE DOGS FOR ACHIEVING INDEP$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
HUMANE OHIO$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
4 PAWS FOR ABILITY$5,000
FRIENDS OF OTTAWA NATIONAL PARK$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOUNDWD WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $5k → 9%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $5k → 9%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $5k → 9%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
OH
CA
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 37 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
4

Total granted

$1.7M
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+98%

Still filing today

49%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BT
    BACK TO THE WILD INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +56%
  • IC
    INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR THE PRESERVATION OF WILD ANIMALS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +34%
  • MV
    MAUMEE VALLEY SAVE A PET
    9× · 2017–2025 · $81k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • K9S FOR WARRIORS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +12%
  • LF
    League for Animal Welfaregraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +98%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Humane Society

The mission of the Wisconsin Humane Society is to make a difference for animals and the people who love them.

Animals
2
Animal Charity of Ohio Inc

The society is dedicated to promoting care for all animals. we strive to never turn away sick or injured. our goal is to bring about a world where humane societies are no longer necessary.

Animals
3
Pet Animal Welfare Society of Connecticut Inc

Pet animal welfare society of ct (paws), established in 1962, is a no-kill animal rescue shelter dedicated to the rescue and adoption of our community's homeless and abused dogs and cats. paws efforts are focused on three critical needs:…

Animals
4
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
5
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
6
Tulsa Spca

The Tulsa SPCA's mission is to improve the lives of dogs and cats, and their human companions.

Animals
7
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
8
All About Animals Rescue

All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.

Animals
9
Paws and Prayers Inc

None

Animals
10
One Tail At a Time West Texas

One tail at a time west texas otat wtx serves the rural communities of west texas by supporting animal shelter operations rescuing and sheltering homeless unwanted companion animals dogs and cats primarily arranging their veterinary care…

Animals
11
The Toledo Zoological Society

We inspire our guests to join us in being advocates for wildlife and conserving the natural world by providing fun, awe-inspiring, and educational experiences. by joining us, others help build a movement that cares for animals and creates…

Animals
12
The California Wildlife Center

The california wildlife center (cwc) takes responsibility for the protection of all native wildlife through rehabilitiation, education and conservation. as the los angeles area's premier wildlife medical care and rehabilitation facility,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pilots to the Rescue Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sierra Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
17/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TOLEDO ZOO FOUNDATION: $180,000 · OtherTOLEDO ZOO FOUNDATIONTHE TOLEDO SYMPHONY: $130,000 · OtherTHE TOLEDO SYMPHONYTOLEDO ANIMAL SHELTER: $110,000 · OtherTOLEDO ANIMAL SHELTERIndividual grant recipient: $81,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientASSISTANCE DOGS FOR ACHIEVING INDEP: $75,000 · OtherASSISTANCE DOGS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPIndividual grant recipient: $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE GREAT LAKES: $58,000 · OtherNATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE GREAT LAKESOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY VET: $57,000 · OtherOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY VETSHIKAR-SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL FO: $50,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO: $44,000 · Other+12 more: $167,800 · Other+12 moreBACK TO THE WILD INC: $90,000 · AnimalsBACK TO THE WILD INCINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR THE PRESERVATION OF WILD ANIMALS INC: $90,000 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR THE PRESERVA…WOOD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $87,500 · AnimalsWOOD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETYMAUMEE VALLEY SAVE A PET: $81,000 · AnimalsMAUMEE VALLEY SAVE A PETTEDDYS RESCUE INC: $75,000 · AnimalsTEDDYS RESCUE INCNATURES NURSERY CENTER FOR WILDLIFE REHAB & CONSR: $60,000 · AnimalsNATURES NURSERY CENTER FOR WILDLIFE R…TOLEDO ANIMAL SHELTER ASSOCIATION: $30,000 · AnimalsTOLEDO ANIMAL SHELTER ASSOCIATIONHUMANE OHIO: $21,000 · Animals+4 more: $23,300 · AnimalsTHE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART: $33,000 · Arts & CultureTOLEDO OPERA ASSOCIATION: $24,000 · Arts & CultureST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $19,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $19,000 · Health4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesDucks Unlimited Inc: $3,600 · EnvironmentTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $2,200 · EnvironmentSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Education
Other$1,022,800Animals$557,800Arts & Culture$57,000Health$38,000Human Services$21,000Environment$5,800Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBACK TO THE WILD INC: $90,000 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR THE PRESERVATION OF WILD ANIMALS INC: $90,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetWOOD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $87,500 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetMAUMEE VALLEY SAVE A PET: $81,000 over 9y, 5.8% of budgetTEDDYS RESCUE INC: $75,000 over 9y, 12% of budgetNATURES NURSERY CENTER FOR WILDLIFE REHAB & CONSR: $60,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetTHE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART: $33,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTOLEDO ANIMAL SHELTER ASSOCIATION: $30,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetTOLEDO OPERA ASSOCIATION: $24,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetHUMANE OHIO: $21,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $19,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $19,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETY: $6,300 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLeague for Animal Welfare: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $3,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $2,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPILOTS TO THE RESCUE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $1,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BACK TO THE WILD INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR THE PRESERVATION OF WILD ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOOD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MAUMEE VALLEY SAVE A PET ↗
  • Who funds TEDDYS RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURES NURSERY CENTER FOR WILDLIFE REHAB & CONSR ↗
  • Who funds THE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds TOLEDO ANIMAL SHELTER ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds TOLEDO OPERA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE OHIO ↗
  • Who funds 4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds TOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds League for Animal Welfare ↗
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PILOTS TO THE RESCUE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Toledo Community Foundation IncOH23.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · Edward Lamb Foundation Inc · The O-I Charities Foundation · Northwest Ohio Community Shares Inc · John Henry Eldred Jr Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John & Virginia Hankison Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John & Virginia Hankison Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to John & Virginia Hankison Foundation?

Find your warmest path to John & Virginia Hankison Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John & Virginia Hankison’s filings →

More from the funding graph