· Private foundation
John and Sue Anthony Charitable Tr
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k23 grants · $73k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $188k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OPEN BIBLE PRISON MINISTRY | $28,600 |
| LIVING ROCK CHURCH | $22,100 |
| CALL TO HIS HEART MINISTRIES | $17,800 |
| BRIDGES FOR PEACE | $16,000 |
| HARVEST TIME ASSEMBLY OF GOD | $16,000 |
| OASIS MINISTRIES | $15,000 |
| TURPENTINE CREEK WILDLIFE REFUGE | $15,000 |
| MAURICEVILLE ASSEMBLY OF GOD | $15,000 |
| CENTRAL ARK DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL | $12,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| MESILLA VALLEY COMMUNITY OF HOPE | $10,000 |
| GLOBAL UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD LA PORTE | $7,500 |
| CHEETAH CONSERVATION FUND | $6,787 |
| KINGDOM ENTERPRISES | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
62 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 38 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTURPENTINE CREEK FOUNDATION INC6× · 2019–2024 · $59k · revenue +62%
Cheetah Conservation Fund5× · 2019–2024 · $30k · revenue +63%- MVMESILLA VALLEY COMMUNITY OF HOPE4× · 2021–2024 · $24k · revenue +91%
Funded once
- LHLIFE HOUSE MISSIONone grant, 2022 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $10k
- NMNEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +353%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We provide a faith-based recovery program for men, women, and children who need help overcoming life's challenges.
To be people who love god and love our neighbors, working in partnership with family, church and community to improve the lives of disadvantaged individuals, following the biblical call of jesus to "go and do likewise" while inspiring…
Because of our love for God, we extend his mercy as we strive to empower and improve the lives of unsheltered adults in Pueblo, CO, through provisions of food, shelter and navigational support services.
New mexico interfaith housing pursues its charitable purpose through the development, production, and management of high quality affordable housing in stable communities. to provide supportive services at no cost to residents for…
To demonstrate the love of Jesus by bringing spiritual guidance and physical relief to the people of Baja and the planting of Christ's church in communities in need of the Gospel.
The organization operates exclusively for the benefit and support of animal protection new mexico, which seeks to educate the public about and advocates campaigns that prevent cruelty to animals.
To provide christ-centered programs and services that lead the homeless toward self-sufficiency.
Stray Hearts is a socially conscious shelter and adoption facility reuniting lost pets with their families and providing humane care and shelter for surrendered, lost, and homeless companion animals in Taos County, New Mexico.Our pledge:…
To provide christian educational programs to children in new mexico.
The Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico serves as a community resource, connects donors to needs, and supports charitable organizations in their work.
Our mission is to provide non-lethal solutions to the homeless, abandoned, and feral animal population of fort smith, arkansas. we will do this through re-unifying animals with their owners, adopting animals to new families, or…
Angelitos Sanctuario rescues dogs, donkeys and other animals in the Central Mexico highlands where we adopt out strong candidates and provide permanent homes for the unadoptable and severely handicapped.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bingen Volunteer Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TURPENTINE CREEK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Baptist Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Cheetah Conservation Fund ↗
- Who funds MESILLA VALLEY COMMUNITY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SHELTER GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO BIOPARK SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
- Who funds FELINES & FRIENDS NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL ARKANSAS DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds KINGDOM ENTERPRISE ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds SAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds OAK GROVE CEMETERY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Battelle Memorial Institute · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Arvest Foundation · C & I Roybal Charitable Foundation · Eugene V and Clare E Thaw Charitable Trust · The Ark Foundation · The Abeles Foundation · Anchorum St Vincent · Nabholz Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization John and Sue Anthony Charitable Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.