Skip to content

· Private foundation

John & Mary Margaret Clay Foundatio

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$84k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$411kEducation$113kHuman Services$39kYouth Development$18kRecreation & Sports$8kHealth$8kCivil Rights$7kPublic Benefit$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $52k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSTIY CHRISTIAN CHURCH$42,100
HYDE PARK SCHOOLS$10,000
GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION$5,625
Individual grant recipient$5,000
COLLEGE OF WOOSTER$3,000
LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
PRESYBETERIAN NIGHT SHELTER$2,500
CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES$2,500
JUNKET$2,500
FORT WORTH COUNTRY DAY$2,000
WOMENS CENTER$1,000
FIRST LIBERTY$1,000
JEWEL CHARITY$1,000
MEMORIALS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $11k → 11%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $6k → 11%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $3k → 11%HOPE FARM: $1k → 11%HOPE FARM: $1k → 11%HOPE FARM: $1k → 11%HOPE FARM: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$522k · 22 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
31

Total granted

$522k
$107k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+61%

Still filing today

36%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthEducationCivil RightsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    5× · 2019–2023 · $9k · revenue +38%
  • FL
    FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE
    6× · 2019–2025 · $7k · revenue +98%
  • JI
    JUNKET INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +158%

Funded once

  • LT
    LA TECH UNIVERSITY -13
    one grant, 2021 · $67k
  • CT
    CENTRAL TABLE OF GRACE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • TV
    THE V FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +61%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Wesleyan University

Texas wesleyan university, guided by its deep methodist heritage, provides transformational learning experiences and research opportunities to a diverse group of students to develop their full potential as individuals and as members of the…

Education
2
Tricity Family Services

Tricity family services (tcfs) is an illinois not-for-profit service agency serving the community members and organizations of central kane county. the agency is dedicated to strengthening people and building community through the…

Human Services
3
Child Care Associates

Cca's mission is to assist family successes through excellence in comprehensive early education and development services.

—
4
Fort Worth Cradle to Career

To bring collaborative, systemic change for students in order to improve overall quality of life and to position tarrant county as a leading producer of high-quality talent.

Youth Development
5
Thompson Child & Family Focus Inc

Founded in 1886, thompson child & family focus is called to strengthen children, families, and communitiesdelivering measurable outcomes through healing, teaching, worship, and play. for more than a century, thompson has transformed lives…

—
6
Childnet Youth & Family Services

To provide safe homes, education and counseling to vulnerable children and families. the program philosophy reinforces personal responsibility and emphasizes the need for a strong family unit.

Human Services
7
Family and Child Guidance Center

Our mission is to provide quality mental health services to children and adults in low income families who are impacted by severe and persistent mental illness, emotional disturbances, child abuse and neglect, high-risk behaviors and…

Health
8
Youth and Family Alliance

Youth and family alliance (dba lifeworks) is a fearless advocate for youth and young adults pursuing a life they love and a stable future for themselves and their families. we strive to break cycles of instability by providing support and…

Human Services
9
Fort Worth Crisis Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to empower young women and men to make a positive decision about their unplanned pregnancy.

Health
10
Focus On Youth Inc

Improve lives by providing trauma-responsive foster care, adoption, and behavioral health services that promote permanency, safety, and well-being for youth and families.

Human Services
11
Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
12
United Way of Tarrant County

As a nonprofit leader, uwtc mobilizes our community to action so all can thrive. we identify critical needs, foster collaboration and invest in solutions that drive change. our programs serve nearly 400,000 people each year.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Women's Center of Tarrant County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Shady Oaks Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $212,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY CHRISTIAN CHURCHUNIVERSTIY CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $179,932 · OtherUNIVERSTIY CHRISTIAN CHURCHLA TECH UNIVERSITY -13: $67,000 · OtherLA TECH UNIVERSITY -13LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY: $22,500 · Other+44 more: $115,856 · Other+44 moreTHE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $16,563 · Human ServicesHOPE FARM INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $2,500 · Human ServicesYOUNG LIFE: $9,000 · Youth DevelopmentJUNKET INC: $5,500 · Youth DevelopmentFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $7,000 · Civil RightsTHE V FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $1,501 · HealthTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $3,000 · EducationGILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $1,000 · EducationDRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE: $2,000 · InternationalShady Oaks Foundation Inc: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$597,788Human Services$23,063Youth Development$14,500Civil Rights$7,000Health$6,501Education$4,000International$2,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $16,563 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GLADNEY FUND: $11,001 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJUNKET INC: $5,500 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FARM INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $1,501 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetShady Oaks Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetGILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION ↗
  • Who funds THE GLADNEY FUND ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds JUNKET INC ↗
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES ↗
  • Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Shady Oaks Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Garvey Texas Foundation IncTX15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Garvey Texas Foundation Inc · Robert D and Catherine R Alexander Foundation · Carol J and R Denny Alexander Foundation · Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation · The Roach Foundation Inc · Amon G Carter Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John & Mary Margaret Clay Foundatio funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John & Mary Margaret Clay Foundatio. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John & Mary Margaret Clay Foundatio?

    Find your warmest path to John & Mary Margaret Clay Foundatio through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John & Mary Margaret Clay Foundatio’s filings →

    More from the funding graph