Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

John and Margie Wiehoff Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$835k
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$180k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$2.0MHealth$1.6MFood & Nutrition$675kHuman Services$470kHousing & Shelter$195kPhilanthropy$180kYouth Development$170kEmployment$90kOther$0
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k26 grants · $405k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $430k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST HUBERT'S CATHOLIC COMMUNITY$180,000
RIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION$100,000
MAYO CLINIC$50,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST PAUL AND MINNEAPOLIS$50,000
ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY$50,000
EVERY MEAL$35,000
THE ALS ASSOCIATION MN CHAPTER$30,000
THE COLLEGE OF ST BENEDICT$30,000
ALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATIONCOURAGE KENNY REHABILITATION INSTITUTE$25,000
JEREMIAH PROGRAM$25,000
PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC$25,000
SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND$25,000
YOUTH FRONTIERS INC$25,000
THE LIFT GARAGE$15,000
MEALS ON WHEELS - SOUTH SHORE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $335k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $25k → 11%YOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $25k → 11%YOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $25k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $10k → 11%YOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $25k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $10k → 11%YOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $25k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $10k → 11%YOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $25k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $10k → 11%YOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $20k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $25k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $25k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $25k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $10k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $10k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $10k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $10k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $5k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of John and Margie Wiehoff Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in MN; read by stated purpose it is 91% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

John and Margie Wiehoff Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.4% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.9M · 26 repeat orgs$330k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +102% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
16

Total granted

$4.9M
$275k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+102%
+34%

Still filing today

62%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    RIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $300k · revenue +228%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
    7× · 2018–2024 · $205k · revenue +102%
  • EM
    EVERY MEAL
    6× · 2019–2024 · $160k · revenue +364%

Funded once

  • GT
    GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -44%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +105%
  • CC
    CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -74%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

2
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
3
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

4
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

5
Minnesota Private College Fund

The minnesota private college fund serves the shared needs of its members by seeking philanthropic support from corporations, foundations, and others for the benefit of its member colleges and universities and the students they educate.

Education
6
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

9
The Minneapolis Foundation

The foundation cultivates generosity by taking action on the greatest civic, social, and economic needs partnering with nonprofits, facilitating grantmaking, driving research and advocacy, and providing services to donors seeking to make a…

Philanthropy
10
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education
11
Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation

Purpose: we inspire, advocate and invest to advance community visions. continued on sch o

Philanthropy
12
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Minnesota Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Meals on Wheels - South Shore. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Leadership DevelopmentYouth and Vulnerable Popula…Christian Faith FormationProfessional Trade Associat…Youth Sports LeaguesDisability Services & Emplo…Institutional Foundations a…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%26%10–20yr21%23%20–35yr14%32%35–55yr9%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr21%17%20–35yr14%30%35–55yr9%40%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
13%
3,751/29,710

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
22/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE ALS ASSOCIATION MN CHAPTER — $603,000 · OtherTHE ALS ASSOCIATION MN CHAPTERST HUBERT'S CATHOLIC COMMUNITY — $590,000 · OtherST HUBERT'S CATHOLIC COMMUNITYST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY — $541,000 · OtherST JOHN'S UNIVERSITYCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST PAUL AND MINNEAPOLIS — $300,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST PAUL AND MINNEAPOLISCOURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION — $195,000 · OtherCOURAGE KENNY FOUNDATIONWESTONKA FOOD SHELF — $110,000 · Other+20 more — $450,000 · Other+20 moreCOLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT — $746,000 · EducationCOLLEGE OF SAINT B…PRODEO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL #4213 — $70,000 · EducationPRODEO ACADEMY CHA…+4 more — $75,000 · Education+4 moreMAYO CLINIC — $360,000 · HealthMAYO CLIN…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA — $90,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WI…+3 more — $25,000 · HealthRIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION — $300,000 · PhilanthropyRIDGEVIEW…GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY — $100,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER T…OPEN HANDS FOUNDATION — $50,000 · PhilanthropyOPEN HAND…CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND — $25,000 · PhilanthropySECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $205,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HA…EVERY MEAL — $160,000 · Food & NutritionEVERY MEA…Meals on Wheels - South Shore — $90,000 · Food & NutritionMeals on …YOUTH FRONTIERS INC — $170,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC — $95,000 · Human ServicesCRESCENT COVE — $70,000 · Human ServicesJEREMIAH PROGRAM — $160,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$2,789,000Education$891,000Health$475,000Philanthropy$475,000Food & Nutrition$455,000Human Services$335,000Housing & Shelter$160,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT — $746,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $360,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $205,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION — $195,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetYOUTH FRONTIERS INC — $170,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetEVERY MEAL — $160,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM — $160,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC — $95,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMeals on Wheels - South Shore — $90,000 over 8y, 18% of budgetThe Lift Garage — $90,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA — $90,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetBridging Inc — $70,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPRODEO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL #4213 — $70,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCRESCENT COVE — $70,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetOPEN HANDS FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 5y, 7.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMCDOWELL SONORAN CONSERVANCY — $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL HAVEN INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMETAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFACE IT FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetMINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREEHOUSE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARM IN ARM IN AFRICA — $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC
  • Who funds RIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
  • Who funds COURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds YOUTH FRONTIERS INC
  • Who funds EVERY MEAL
  • Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM
  • Who funds GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY
  • Who funds PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels - South Shore
  • Who funds The Lift Garage
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA
  • Who funds Bridging Inc
  • Who funds PRODEO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL #4213
  • Who funds CRESCENT COVE
  • Who funds OPEN HANDS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac
  • Who funds MCDOWELL SONORAN CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC
  • Who funds ANIMAL HAVEN INC
  • Who funds METAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC
  • Who funds FACE IT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ACHIEVING CURES TOGETHER
  • Who funds MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN28.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · American Gift Fund · Bame Foundation · The K Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization John and Margie Wiehoff Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph