Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Margie Wiehoff Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$985k
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$190k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.0MHealth$1.6MFood & Nutrition$675kHuman Services$470kHousing & Shelter$195kPhilanthropy$180kYouth Development$170kEmployment$90kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $435k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $540k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST HUBERT'S CATHOLIC COMMUNITY$190,000
RIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION$100,000
ST HUBERT'S CATHOLIC COMMUNITY$100,000
ALS ASSOCIATION MN CHAPTER$50,000
ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY$50,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST PAUL AND MINNEAPOLIS$50,000
EVERY MEAL$35,000
THE COLLEGE OF ST BENEDICT$30,000
MAYO CLINIC$25,000
DESERT HIGHLANDS FOUNDATION$25,000
THE SOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL$25,000
ALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATIONCOURAGE KENNY REHABILITATION INSTITUTE$25,000
YOUTH FRONTIERS INC$25,000
MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION$25,000
JEREMIAH PROGRAM$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $380k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $25k → 11%YOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $25k → 11%YOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $25k → 11%YOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $25k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $10k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $10k → 11%YOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $25k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $10k → 11%YOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $25k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $10k → 11%YOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $25k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $10k → 11%VRANICURE: $10k → 5%YOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $20k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $25k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $25k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $25k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $10k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $10k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $10k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $10k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $5k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of John and Margie Wiehoff Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in MN; by stated purpose, 91%.

John and Margie Wiehoff Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.8M · 30 repeat orgs$380k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
16

Total granted

$5.8M
$275k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+34%

Still filing today

57%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    RIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $400k · revenue +228%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
    7× · 2018–2024 · $205k · revenue +81%
  • EM
    EVERY MEAL
    7× · 2019–2025 · $195k · revenue +364%

Funded once

  • GT
    GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -41%
  • CC
    CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -74%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +105%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
2
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
3
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
4
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
5
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Minnesota Private College Fund

The minnesota private college fund serves the shared needs of its members by seeking philanthropic support from corporations, foundations, and others for the benefit of its member colleges and universities and the students they educate.

Education
8
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
9
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
10
St Catherine University

We educate women to lead and influence. we educate at all degree levels through valuing and integrating the liberal arts and professional education within the catholic intellectual tradition, see schedule oemphasizing scholarly inquiry and…

Education
11
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education
12
Mercy College of Health Sciences

We, mercy college of health sciences and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mercy college of health sciences is a member of trinity health.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Minnesota Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Meals on Wheels - South Shore. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
24/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST HUBERT'S CATHOLIC COMMUNITY: $890,000 · OtherST HUBERT'S CATHOLIC COMMUNITYTHE ALS ASSOCIATION MN CHAPTER: $653,000 · OtherTHE ALS ASSOCIATION MN CHAPTERST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY: $601,000 · OtherST JOHN'S UNIVERSITYCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST PAUL AND MINNEAPOLIS: $350,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST PAUL AND MINNEAPOLISCOURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION: $195,000 · OtherCOURAGE KENNY FOUNDATIONWESTONKA FOOD SHELF: $120,000 · Other+25 more: $635,000 · Other+25 moreCOLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT: $796,000 · EducationCOLLEGE OF SAINT…PRODEO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL #4213: $70,000 · EducationPRODEO ACADEMY C…+5 more: $100,000 · Education+5 moreRIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION: $400,000 · PhilanthropyRIDGEVIEW…GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $100,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER T…OPEN HANDS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyOPEN HAND…CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $25,000 · PhilanthropySECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $205,000 · Food & NutritionEVERY MEAL: $195,000 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheels - South Shore: $110,000 · Food & NutritionMAYO CLINIC: $385,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA: $90,000 · Health+4 more: $30,000 · HealthYOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $195,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $95,000 · Human ServicesCRESCENT COVE: $80,000 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $185,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$3,444,000Education$966,000Philanthropy$575,000Food & Nutrition$510,000Health$505,000Human Services$380,000Housing & Shelter$185,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT: $796,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetRIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION: $400,000 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $385,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $205,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEVERY MEAL: $195,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCOURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION: $195,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetYOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $195,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $185,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMeals on Wheels - South Shore: $110,000 over 9y, 22% of budgetThe Lift Garage: $105,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $95,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA: $90,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCRESCENT COVE: $80,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetBridging Inc: $80,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPRODEO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL #4213: $70,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN HANDS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 7.7% of budgetMINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT HIGHLANDS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMCDOWELL SONORAN CONSERVANCY: $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFACE IT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetANIMAL HAVEN INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMETAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetARM IN ARM IN AFRICA: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTREEHOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT ↗
  • Who funds RIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds EVERY MEAL ↗
  • Who funds COURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH FRONTIERS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels - South Shore ↗
  • Who funds The Lift Garage ↗
  • Who funds GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds CRESCENT COVE ↗
  • Who funds Bridging Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRODEO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL #4213 ↗
  • Who funds OPEN HANDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DESERT HIGHLANDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC ↗
  • Who funds MCDOWELL SONORAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds VraniCURE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN28.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · American Gift Fund · Bame Foundation · The K Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Margie Wiehoff Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Margie Wiehoff Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John and Margie Wiehoff’s filings →

    More from the funding graph