· Private foundation
Healthcare Foundation of Northern Lake County
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN LAKE COUNTY’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $4k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $618k
- $50k–250k21 grants · $1.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COLLEGE OF LAKE COUNTY | $139,000 |
| NICASA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICE | $110,000 |
| COMMUNITY YOUTH NETWORK | $110,000 |
| ARDEN SHORE CHILD AND FAMILY | $110,000 |
| LAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER | $102,500 |
| YOUTH & FAMILY COUNSELING | $100,000 |
| MANO A MANO FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER | $100,000 |
| ERIE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER | $97,500 |
| HEART OF THE CITY | $76,768 |
| MOBILE CARE FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO | $75,000 |
| TASC INC | $65,000 |
| LAKE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | $65,000 |
| ANTIOCH AREA HEALTH ACCESSIBILITY | $65,000 |
| JOSSELYN CENTER | $60,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
45 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $610k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PLPADS Lake County Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $577k · revenue +94%
- NNNICASA NFP3× · 2021–2023 · $503k · revenue +32%
- ASARDEN SHORE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES4× · 2021–2024 · $487k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- YLYWCA LAKE COUNTYone grant, 2021 · $66k · revenue 0%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $64k
- UUCANgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue +66%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To enhance the quality of life for children and families by inspiring hope and empowerment and growth within all whom we serve.
The chicago children's advocacy center unites public, private, and community partners to ensure the safety, health, and well-being of abused children.
Infant welfare society of chicago (iws) (d/b/a iws family health) provides quality medical, dental and behavioral health services for the health, physical and mental development of children and their families in the chicagoland community.
Administering an array of critical, intensive therapeutic interventions and/or facilitation services to emotionally and behaviorally disturbed clients for whom DCFS is legally responsible in order to stabilize their traditional or home of…
Our mission is to provide community-centered mental health services that empower individuals and families to build resilience and lead lives filled with meaning, connection, and hope.
Chicago family health center will promote health, work to prevent disease and provide treatment through the delivery of quality, accessible primary healtcare that is culturally sensitive, affordable, and responsive to community and…
Child Link provides foster care, family counseling, and therapy services to Chicago area adolescents who are at risk of homelessness. Child Link also refers adolescents to other agencies that are able to provide additional resources and…
To foster stronger communities by providing individuals with accessible, professional counseling and mental health care that empowers them to thrive
To Provide counseling, crisis intervention, case management, psychosocial rehabilitative and vocational services to mentally ill and substance abuse clients in outpatient and community based settings.
The organization is committed to the mission of facilitating the empowerment of women, trans people, and young people by providing access to health care and health education in a respectful environment where people pay what they can afford.
Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…
Our mission is to strengthen and heal families and individuals from all walks of life through clinical service, education and research.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sga Youth & Family Services Nfp and the most unlike its peers is Zion Benton Children's Service. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PADS Lake County Inc ↗
- Who funds NICASA NFP ↗
- Who funds ARDEN SHORE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Erie Family Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY YOUTH NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds MANO A MANO FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds YOUTH AND FAMILY COUNSELING ↗
- Who funds LAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds THE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP ↗
- Who funds WAUKEGAN PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ANTIOCH AREA HEALTHCARE ACCESSIBILITY ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTHBUILD LAKE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ELDERCARE LAKE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Cristo Rey St Martin College Prep ↗
- Who funds Zion Benton Children's Service ↗
- Who funds YOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS ↗
- Who funds Equal Hope ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE OF LAKE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Hispanic American Community Education & Services ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF LAKE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Lake County ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES FOR STRONGER COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds HEART OF THE CITY ↗
- Who funds FAMILY FOCUS LEGACY ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago ↗
- Who funds MOBILE CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE THRESHOLDS ↗
- Who funds YWCA LAKE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds WILLOW HOUSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Lake County Community Foundation · John and Kathleen Schreiber Foundation D/B/A Schreiber Philanthropy · United Way of Lake County Inc · Circle of Service Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · Give N Kind · The Gorter Family Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Visiting Nurse Association of Chicago (Aka) Vna Foundation · Trustmark Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Healthcare Foundation of Northern Lake County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Healthcare Foundation of Northern Lake County?
Find your warmest path to Healthcare Foundation of Northern Lake County through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.