Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Helen Ilsley Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$194kHealth$31kHuman Services$19kArts & Culture$10kReligion$9kEducation$2kPhilanthropy$2kYouth Development$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$477k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING$20,000
THE HUB ON SMITH$2,000
WYO THEATER INC$1,000
A PLACE OF WHOLENESS$1,000
WYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
TOYS FOR TOTS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE HUB ON SMITH: $3k → 10%THE HUB ON SMITH: $3k → 10%THE HUB ON SMITH: $2k → 10%THE HUB ON SMITH: $2k → 10%THE HUB ON SMITH: $2k → 10%THE HUB ON SMITH: $2k → 10%ADVOCACY & RESOURCE CENTE: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$259k · 11 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$259k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+51%

Still filing today

45%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +55%
  • WS
    WYOMING STATE GOLF ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2017–2024 · $9k · revenue +85%
  • BH
    BIG HORN EDUCATION FUND INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $2k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • SC
    SENIOR CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • AB
    ANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +116%
  • AR
    ADVOCACY & RESOURCE CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +51%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wyoming Donor Alliance

The wyoming donor alliance supports a network of statewide organizations focused on increasing civic participation.

Public Benefit
2
Wyoming Wildlife Advocates

To promote science-based wildlife management that fosters ecosystem health and dynamic equilibrium between species throughout the state of wyoming.

Animals
3
Cowboy State Daily

Cowboy state daily's mission is to provide high-quality local and statewide reporting on the issues that impact wyoming, featuring stories that capture wyoming's wonderful "small town with long streets" vibe.

Arts & Culture
4
Wyoming Sportsmans Group

Provide financial support

Animals
5
Shoshoni Senior Citizens Inc

The purpose of the entity is to provide activities, wellness and nutrition programs for senior citizens in shoshoni, wy and the surrounding area.

Human Services
6
Weston County Library Foundation

To enhance the quality of public library services to weston county, wy by securing resources to support library programs and projects not normally met by public funding.

—
7
Wyoming Sheep Foundation
Food & Nutrition
8
Friends of Hogadon

The organization's mission is to provide furniture and equipment for the benefit of the hogadon basin ski area (a governmental owned facility) in natrona county, wyoming.

Recreation & Sports
9
Wyoming Assn of Non Profit Organizations dba Wyoming Nonprofit Network

The Wyoming Nonprofit Network represents the collective voice of the Wyoming charitable nonprofit sector and brings best practices, resources, and support to the nonprofit community.

Philanthropy
10
Wyoming Wildlife Federation

Wyoming wildlife federation delivers leadership in conservation for the state's wildlife, hunters, anglers, and conservationists through policy, education, advocacy, and habitat.

Animals
11
Big Horn Baseball Club

The specific purpose and mission of the corporation is charitable, in particular to provide a baseball facility for the youth of big horn, wyoming, and surrounding areas, by fundraising, construction and operation of the facility.

Youth Development
12
Wyoming Historical Society Group Return

To insure that wyoming's past remains accessible to present and future generations and to educate, support and foster the study of wyoming history.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wyoming Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Senior Citizen Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING: $157,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WYOMINGSHERIDAN CO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUND: $25,000 · OtherSHERIDAN CO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDA PLACE OF WHOLENESS: $9,000 · OtherWYOMING STATE GOLF ASSOCIATION: $8,500 · Other+5 more: $16,500 · Other+5 moreSHERIDAN ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsSHERIDAN A…ANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL: $12,000 · Human ServicesADVOCACY & RESOURCE CENTER: $500 · Human ServicesWYO THEATRE INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureWYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · PhilanthropyBIG HORN EDUCATION FUND INC: $2,000 · EducationDOWNTOWN SHERIDAN ASSOCIATION: $500 · Community Improvement
Other$216,500Recreation & Sports$26,000Human Services$12,500Arts & Culture$10,000Philanthropy$2,000Education$2,000Community Improvement$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHERIDAN ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWYO THEATRE INC: $10,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetWYOMING STATE GOLF ASSOCIATION: $8,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetWYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIG HORN EDUCATION FUND INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetADVOCACY & RESOURCE CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOWNTOWN SHERIDAN ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHERIDAN ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds WYO THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds WYOMING STATE GOLF ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIG HORN EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCACY & RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN SHERIDAN ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

William F Welch & Lorene W Welch FoundationWY15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: William F Welch & Lorene W Welch Foundation · Forrest E Mars Jr Sheridan Charitable · The Roberts Family Foundation · Joe and Arlene Watt Foundation Inc · Homer A Scott & Mildred S Scott Foundation · Wyoming Community Foundation · Muriel and Seymour Thickman Family Foundation · Homer A Jr & Janet Scott Family Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Helen Ilsley Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Helen Ilsley Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John and Helen Ilsley Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to John and Helen Ilsley Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John and Helen Ilsley Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph