Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Elizabeth Leonard Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$455k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$4.0MHealth$720kHuman Services$579kInternational$410kEnvironment$345kRecreation & Sports$38k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $475k
  • $250k+2 grants · $839k
$78,936
Median grant
6
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UC RIVERSIDE FOUNDATION$454,500
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BE$384,000
EJE ACADEMICS$100,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$85,000
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RES$81,000
COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER$78,936
NATURE COLLECTIVE$70,000
CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION$60,000
YOSEMITE CONSERVANCY$41,082
ST JOHN FISHER COLLEGE$25,000
AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON FOUNDATION$18,750
YELLOWSTONE PARK FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $579k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $150k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $150k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $125k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $79k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $75k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.9M · 11 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against -18% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$5.9M
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
-18%

Still filing today

73%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $579k · revenue +110%
  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $410k · revenue +33%
  • CC
    CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $300k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • 4F
    49ER FOUNDATION - CSU LONG BEACH
    one grant, 2021 · $42k
  • BU
    Bastyr University
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
5
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
6
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
7
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
10
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
11
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
12
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Resource Center; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BE: $1,658,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RES: $420,000 · OtherAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100,000 · Other+3 more: $98,250 · OtherUC RIVERSIDE FOUNDATION: $1,905,053 · EducationUC RIVERSIDE FOUNDATIONEJE ACADEMIES: $300,000 · EducationEJE ACADEMIES+2 more: $65,000 · EducationPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $410,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN H…CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY: $300,000 · HealthCONQUER CANCE…COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $579,088 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY …NATURE COLLECTIVE: $170,000 · EnvironmentYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $56,082 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,276,250Education$2,270,053Health$710,000Human Services$579,088Environment$170,000Recreation & Sports$56,082

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUC RIVERSIDE FOUNDATION: $1,905,053 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $579,088 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $410,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY: $300,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetEJE ACADEMIES: $300,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetNATURE COLLECTIVE: $170,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $56,082 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON FOUNDATION: $18,750 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBastyr University: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UC RIVERSIDE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds EJE ACADEMIES ↗
  • Who funds NATURE COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds YOSEMITE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Bastyr University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Sempra Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Elizabeth Leonard Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Elizabeth Leonard Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John and Elizabeth Leonard Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph