Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Daria Barry Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32M
Granted FY2025still arriving
51
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$11M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$45MPhilanthropy$21MHealth$9.4MCommunity Improvement$8.5MEnvironment$3.3MHuman Services$1.2MHousing & Shelter$900kInternational$570kOther$0
02FY2025 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $172k
  • $50k–250k24 grants · $2.5M
  • $250k+18 grants · $29M
$110,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$664M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM$11,061,712
FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION$4,543,421
WOODSON CENTER$2,146,609
INNER-CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND$1,821,606
GUARDIAN REVIVAL$1,700,000
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCE AND LETTERS$1,250,000
GLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$1,015,725
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$1,006,453
PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION$610,484
THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND$600,000
MATER SALVATORIS COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL$526,850
Individual grant recipient$500,000
BRILLA NEW JERSEY CHARTER SCHOOL$500,000
THE AVALON NETWORK$450,000
ACADEMIC FREEDOM ALLIANCE$450,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RETHINK PRIORITIES: $100k → 10%WINDMARK SAILING FOUNDATION INC: $34k → 6%CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $90k → 14%WHO WILL GO: $160k → 9%FAITH HOPE LOVE CHARITY: $100k → 11%WINDMARK SAILING FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 6%CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $35k → 14%WHO WILL GO: $90k → 9%FAITH HOPE LOVE CHARITY: $100k → 11%WHO WILL GO: $60k → 9%FAITH HOPE LOVE CHARITY: $100k → 11%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $25k → 17%FAITH HOPE LOVE CHARITY: $100k → 11%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $25k → 17%FAITH HOPE LOVE CHARITY: $100k → 11%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $25k → 17%ELM INSTITUTE: $140k → 12%ELM INSTITUTE: $130k → 12%ELM INSTITUTE: $120k → 12%ELM INSTITUTE: $120k → 12%ELM INSTITUTE: $120k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OR
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
DE
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$87M · 41 repeat orgs$4.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
9

Total granted

$87M
$408k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+5%

Still filing today

78%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentPhilanthropyHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    Foundation For Excellence in Higher Education
    6× · 2020–2025 · $22M · revenue +22% · 73% of their budget
  • IC
    INNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $20M · revenue +18%
  • GR
    GUARDIAN REVIVAL INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5.3M · revenue +647% · 66% of their budget

Funded once

  • CO
    CATHEDRAL OF ST JOHN THE BAPTIST (PATERSON NJ DIOSE)
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
  • PF
    PRINCETONIANS FOR FREE SPEECH
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
8
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
9
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
10
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
11
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
12
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seton Education Partners; the most unlike its peers is Who Will Go Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

10
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/50
Grantees still filing
29/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $31,822,685 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAMFoundation For Excellence in Higher Education: $21,883,950 · PhilanthropyFoundation For Excellence in Higher EducationPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $5,212,319 · PhilanthropyPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATIONSETON EDUCATION PARTNERS: $3,000,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $749,221 · PhilanthropyINNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $19,926,511 · OtherINNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND I…MATER SALVATORIS COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $3,699,200 · OtherMATER SALVATORIS COLLEGE PREP…+29 more: $7,907,478 · Other+29 moreWOODSON CENTER: $10,605,446 · Community ImprovementWOODSON C…+1 more: $150,000 · Community ImprovementGUARDIAN REVIVAL INC: $5,250,000 · Public BenefitVeterans Consortium Pro Bono Program: $680,000 · Public Benefit+1 more: $50,000 · Public BenefitAmerican Academy of Sciences and Letters Inc: $2,500,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $2,006,453 · EducationThe Trustees of Princeton University: $726,623 · EducationWONDERLAND BOOKSAVERS INC: $250,000 · Education+6 more: $315,000 · EducationSAVE THE SOUND: $1,702,656 · EnvironmentTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $850,802 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $720,000 · EnvironmentCAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC: $425,000 · EnvironmentCANYON GUARD: $200,000 · Environment+2 more: $80,000 · EnvironmentElm Institute Inc: $630,000 · Human ServicesFAITH-HOPE-LOVE-CHARITY INC: $500,000 · Human ServicesWHO WILL GO INC: $310,400 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $125,000 · Human ServicesCHILD HOPE WORLDWIDE INC dba givenetorg: $120,000 · Human ServicesRethink Priorities: $100,000 · Human ServicesPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $75,000 · Human Services+1 more: $48,500 · Human Services
Philanthropy$62,668,175Other$31,533,189Community Improvement$10,755,446Public Benefit$5,980,000Education$5,798,076Environment$3,978,458Human Services$1,908,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $31,822,685 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFoundation For Excellence in Higher Education: $21,883,950 over 6y, 73% of budgetINNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $19,926,511 over 6y, 18% of budgetWOODSON CENTER: $10,605,446 over 5y, 81% of budgetGUARDIAN REVIVAL INC: $5,250,000 over 5y, 66% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $5,212,319 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetSETON EDUCATION PARTNERS: $3,000,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetAmerican Academy of Sciences and Letters Inc: $2,500,000 over 3y, 57% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $2,006,453 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE SOUND: $1,702,656 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetGLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,015,725 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $850,802 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $726,623 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $720,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetVeterans Consortium Pro Bono Program: $680,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetElm Institute Inc: $630,000 over 5y, 36% of budgetFAITH-HOPE-LOVE-CHARITY INC: $500,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetAcademic Freedom Alliance: $450,000 over 1y, 59% of budgetCAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC: $425,000 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetWHO WILL GO INC: $310,400 over 3y, 85% of budgetTHE URBAN ASSEMBLY INC: $300,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetMAYAS HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $299,221 over 6y, 10% of budgetSAIL TO PREVAIL: $275,000 over 6y, 8.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $253,931 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWONDERLAND BOOKSAVERS INC: $250,000 over 1y, 58% of budgetJOYJ INITIATIVE: $225,000 over 6y, 67% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $125,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCHILD HOPE WORLDWIDE INC dba givenetorg: $120,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNARROW RIVER PRESERVATION ASSOC INC: $50,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetCROSSROADS CLUB INC: $50,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHARLEM ACADEMY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWINDMARK SAILING FOUNDATION INC: $48,500 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetFRANKLIN NEWS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GREENWICH LAND TRUST INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE NORTH SHORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $24,000 over 3y, 40% of budgetNEW HAVEN ECOLOGY PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds Foundation For Excellence in Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds INNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODSON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GUARDIAN REVIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SETON EDUCATION PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds American Academy of Sciences and Letters Inc ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE SOUND ↗
  • Who funds GLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds Veterans Consortium Pro Bono Program ↗
  • Who funds Elm Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAITH-HOPE-LOVE-CHARITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AVALON NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Academic Freedom Alliance ↗
  • Who funds CAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC ↗
  • Who funds WHO WILL GO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE URBAN ASSEMBLY INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYAS HOPE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAIL TO PREVAIL ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC ↗
  • Who funds WONDERLAND BOOKSAVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds JOYJ INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds CANYON GUARD ↗
  • Who funds Another Farm Friends Inc ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY15.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Daria Barry Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Daria Barry Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 37%
  • Faith-Hope-Love-Charity Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Save the Sound: 37% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • New Haven Ecology Project Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John and Daria Barry’s filings →

More from the funding graph