Skip to content
John & Claudia Holliman Affiliated Fund of the Occf Inc at a glance

· Public charity

John & Claudia Holliman Affiliated Fund of the Occf Inc

Support the oklahoma city community foundation, inc.

$132k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Animals$195kCivil Rights$151kInternational$140kEducation$96kHuman Services$61kPhilanthropy$20kArts & Culture$13k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $118,568, the rows itemized in this filing. The $132,068 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $13,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $113k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC$25,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION (ACLU) OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION$20,000
ALPHA CHARTER OF EXCELLENCE INC$18,068
WORLD NEIGHBORS$10,000
SALVATION ARMY$10,000
OKLAHOMA SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS FOUNDATION$10,000
NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION$10,000
CORAL GABLES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
NEXUS ANIMALS$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Nepal Youth Foundation: $10k → 8%NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 17%Oklahoma Philharmonic Society: $8k → 16%ALPHA CHARTER OF EXCELLENCE INC: $18k → 15%Nepal Youth Foundation: $10k → 8%NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Inc: $10k → 17%Oklahoma Philharmonic Society: $6k → 16%ALPHA CHARTER OF EXCELLENCE INC: $12k → 15%Nepal Youth Foundation: $10k → 10%WORLD NEIGHBORS: $10k → 16%CORAL GABLES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%Salvation Army: $11k → 16%CORAL GABLES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%WORLD NEIGHBORS: $10k → 16%SALVATION ARMY: $10k → 16%World Neighbors Inc: $10k → 16%Salvation Army: $10k → 16%World Neighbors Inc: $10k → 16%Salvation Army: $10k → 16%World Neighbors Inc: $10k → 16%SALVATION ARMY: $10k → 16%WORLD NEIGHBORS: $10k → 16%SALVATION ARMY: $10k → 16%Oklahoma School of Science and Mathematics Foundation: $10k → 16%OKLAHOMA SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%OKLAHOMA SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%OKLAHOMA SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%OKLAHOMA SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%Oklahoma School of Science and Mathematics Foundation: $8k → 16%Oklahoma School of Science and Mathematics Foundation: $8k → 16%American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma Foundation: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of John & Claudia Holliman Affiliated Fund of the Occf Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 78% of the giving stays in OK; by stated purpose, 75%.

John & Claudia Holliman Affiliated Fund of the Occf Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.0% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$649k · 9 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$649k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+2662%

Still filing today

89%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsCivil RightsInternationalPhilanthropyArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OZ
    OKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $190k · revenue +145%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $131k · revenue +10%
  • NY
    NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $80k · revenue +142%

Funded once

  • NE
    NEXUS EQUINE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $6k · revenue ×28
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma Inc

Educate, advocate, defend, and protect the civil rights and liberties guaranteed by the united states and oklahoma constitutions.

Community Improvement
2
American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa

The union works to advocate and advance a public policy agenda to support and protect the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of iowa. it works to maintain throughout the united states the rights of free…

—
3
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Ks

The misson of the aclu foundation of kansas is to protect and defend the constitutional rights and civil liberties of every individual in kansas regardless of creed, race, religion or other labeling through education, advocacy, and…

Civil Rights
4
American Civil Liberties Union of Utah

The organization's mission is to preserve and promote individual civil rights and civil liberties as guaranteed by the united states and utah constitutions and the civil rights laws within the state of utah.

—
5
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Oklahoma State Afl-Cio

Promote labor unions

—
7
American Civil Liberties Union of Alaska

Preservation and promotion of civil rights and civil liberties.

—
8
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Iowa

The foundation works to defend and promote the constitution of the united states, focusing especially on the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and 14th amendments. the foundation also works to defend and promote the constitution of the…

Civil Rights
9
American Civil Liberties Union of Alaska Foundation

The aclu of alaska is a non-partisan organization dedicated to advancing the cause of civil liberties in alaska through public education and legal action.

Civil Rights
10
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
11
Oklahoma Optometric Association

The oklahoma association of optometric physicians is a professional association dedicated to advocacy, education, and other resources for oklahoma optometric physicians. mission statement: unite. empower. advocate.

—
12
Oklahoma Association of Realtors

The oklahoma association of realtors connects real estate professionals across the state by providing comprehensive professional resources, maintaining the highest ethical standards and giving realtors a unified voice in shaping oklahoma…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma Zoological Society; the most unlike its peers is Nepal Youth Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $189,500 · AnimalsOKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY+1 more: $5,500 · AnimalsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $130,500 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES …AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES …NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION: $80,000 · InternationalNEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATIONWORLD NEIGHBORS INC: $60,000 · InternationalWORLD NEIGHBORS INCOKLAHOMA SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS FOUNDATION: $65,000 · PhilanthropyOKLAHOMA SCHOO…CORAL GABLES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyCORAL GABLES C…THE SALVATION ARMY: $60,500 · OtherTHE SALVAT…ALPHA CHARTER OF EXCELLENCE INC: $30,512 · EducationOKLAHOMA PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY INC: $13,000 · Arts & Culture
Animals$195,000Civil Rights$150,500International$140,000Philanthropy$85,000Other$60,500Education$30,512Arts & Culture$13,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $189,500 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $130,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetNEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetOKLAHOMA SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetWORLD NEIGHBORS INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetALPHA CHARTER OF EXCELLENCE INC: $30,512 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCORAL GABLES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kirkpatrick Foundatio…Oklahoma City Communi…El and Thelma Gaylord…Natl Christian Charit…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Kirkpatrick Foundation IncOK15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kirkpatrick Foundation Inc · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John & Claudia Holliman Affiliated Fund of the Occf Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John & Claudia Holliman Affiliated Fund of the Occf Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 46%
  • World Neighbors Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Alpha Charter of Excellence Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to John & Claudia Holliman Affiliated Fund of the Occf Inc?

Find your warmest path to John & Claudia Holliman Affiliated Fund of the Occf Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John & Claudia Holliman Affiliated Fund of the Occf’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home