· Public charity
Jobs for America's Graduates Inc
To empower the nation's young people with the skills and support to succeed in education, employment, and life.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $1,131,109 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,233,357 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $102,248 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $4k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $67k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Jobs for Nevada Graduates Inc | $216,940 |
| Jobs 4 California's Graduates | $212,724 |
| Coalition for Responsible Community Dev | $191,463 |
| Tri County Jobs for Ohio's Graduates | $182,656 |
| Youth Solutions | $144,316 |
| Jobs for Pennsylvania Graduates | $59,404 |
| iJAG | $52,570 |
| Covenant House | $30,614 |
| Jobs for Mississippi Graduates | $25,000 |
| Jobs for Arizona Graduates | $11,264 |
| Center for Alternative Sentencing & Emp | $4,158 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $528k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JFJOBS FOR NEVADAS GRADUATES INC8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +37%
- KYKINEXUS YOUTH SOLUTIONS7× · 2017–2024 · $906k · revenue +100%
- CFCOALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT7× · 2018–2024 · $809k · revenue +414%
Funded once
- JFJOBS FOR WEST VIRGINIA GRADUATESone grant, 2017 · $140k
- LDLOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONone grant, 2018 · $100k
- JFJOBS FOR AMERICA'S GRADUATES - LOUISIANAone grant, 2020 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To empower the nation's young people with the skills and support to succeed in education, employment, and life.
The mission of alliance for strategic growth, inc. is to empower the eastern indiana workforce to meet existing and future sector-driven employment demands.
Youth job center connects youth ages 14-25 to meaningful careers through early exposure, workforce training, individualized coaching, and strong employer partnerships. we meet young people where they are and guide them toward living-wage…
The work group provides at-risk youth in transition to adulthood with the resources they need to become self-directed, self-sufficient individuals and productive, responsible members of their families and communities.
Jobsfirstnyc's mission is to create and advance solutions that break down barriers and transform the systems supporting young adults and their communities in the pursuit of economic opportunities.
Junior achievement accelerates economic opportunity and mobility for youth through cross-sector collaboration to deliver innovative solutions that improve educational and economic outcomes for students.
Our mission is to bridge the divide between our regions youth and the growing skills gap in our workforce. we envision a city where our youth have the opportunity they need to succeed, and our businesses have the workforce they need to…
The mission of junior achievement of maine is to inspire and prepare young people to own their economic success.
Junior achievement of oklahoma is dedicated to educating students about work readiness, entrepreneurship, and financial literacy through experiential hands-on programs.
The mission statement of jani is: to inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy.
To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy.
Lancaster county academy's mission is to empower non-traditional learners to achieve academic success, career readiness and personal growth through flexible, student-centered programs that values independence, resilience, and real-world…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jobs for Kentucky's Graduates Inc and the most unlike its peers is Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JOBS FOR NEVADAS GRADUATES INC ↗
- Who funds KINEXUS YOUTH SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds TRI COUNTY JOBS FOR OHIO'S GRADUATES ↗
- Who funds JOBS 4 CALIFORNIA GRADUATES ↗
- Who funds Jobs for Arizona's Graduates ↗
- Who funds JMG - Generation New England Inc ↗
- Who funds JOBS FOR KENTUCKY'S GRADUATES INC ↗
- Who funds IOWA JOBS FOR AMERICA'S GRADUATES INC ↗
- Who funds JOBS FOR MISSISSIPPI GRADUATES INC ↗
- Who funds JOBS FOR AMERICA'S GRADUATES - MISSOURI INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION FOR FLORIDA'S GRADUATES INC ↗
- Who funds NEW JERSEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JOBS FOR AMERICA'S GRADUATES TENNESSEE ↗
- Who funds JOBS FOR AMERICA'S GRADUATES - NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds BERRIEN-CASS-VANBUREN WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ALASKA ↗
- Who funds JOBS FOR AMERICA'S GRADUATES - KANSAS I ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds Jobs For Americas Graduates Of Pennsylvania ↗
- Who funds Jobs for Maine's Graduates Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVE SENTENCING AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds FORWARD SERVICE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds JOBS FOR AMERICAS GRADUATES NM INC ↗
- Who funds JOBS FOR VIRGINIA GRADUATES INC ↗
- Who funds Indianapolis Private Industry Council ↗
- Who funds YOUTH OPPORTUNITIES UNLIMITED ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Youth Collaborative ↗
- Who funds OLNEY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL AN ASPIRA INC OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: AT&T Foundation · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · Share Our Strength · Tides Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jobs for America's Graduates Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Leaders for Life Inc — 24% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.