Skip to content
Joan and Tim Fenton Family Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Joan and Tim Fenton Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
29
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$5.0MArts & Culture$4.3MInternational$2.8MYouth Development$2.6MPhilanthropy$2.3MHealth$2.2MCrime & Legal$2.2MReligion$1.2MOther$0
02FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $152k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.1M
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$92M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AERIAL RECOVERY$300,000
ATLANTIS USA FOUNDATION$250,000
Individual grant recipient$250,000
U OF U - ECCLES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS$250,000
INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$215,000
CHARITY VISION INTERNATIONAL$200,000
NATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION$100,000
U OF U - MORAN EYE CENTER$100,000
UTAH AUTISM ACADEMY$100,000
SUMMIT JOURNEYS INC$98,000
WESTMINSTER COLLEGE$75,000
USANA KIDS EAT$70,000
PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$50,000
RACHEL COVEY FOUNDATION$30,000
BALLET WEST$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SEEKHAVEN INC: $5k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50k → 11%FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION FOR GENERATIONS: $39k → 6%RESCUE FUND: $250k → 10%COAXION GLOBAL: $20k → 13%DONNIE EDWARDS BEST DEFENSE FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%DONNIE EDWARDS BEST DEFENSE FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%ABILITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%UTAH PARENT CENTER INC: $15k → 8%AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES: $20k → 8%ABILITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%ELIZABETH SMART FOUNDATION: $400k → 8%ELIZABETH SMART FOUNDATION: $100k → 8%ELIZABETH SMART FOUNDATION: $75k → 8%UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE: $25k → 8%UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE: $15k → 8%YOUTH MAKING A DIFFERENCE: $5k → 8%HEALING HANDS INCORPORATED: $100k → 8%SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION OF UTAH: $10k → 8%HEALING HANDS INCORPORATED: $20k → 8%SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION OF UTAH: $10k → 8%SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION OF UTAH: $10k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $5k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $5k → 8%BACKCOUNTRY SANTA INC: $50k → 8%SENIOR CHARITY CARE FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%SENIOR CHARITY CARE FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%BACKCOUNTRY SANTA INC: $50k → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $50k → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MA
OR
CA
UT
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20M · 59 repeat orgs$6.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

59 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2024, 38 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

59
64

Total granted

$20M
$5.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+12%

Still filing today

76%
66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $695k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthEducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OR
    OUR RESCUE
    5× · 2017–2022 · $2.4M · revenue +180%
  • S
    Saprea
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1.5M · revenue +24%
  • PU
    PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $800k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • HC
    HALE CENTRE THEATREgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M · revenue +95%
  • LA
    LIBERTY AND LIGHT SPEAR FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $700k · revenue -75% · 56% of their budget
  • TN
    THE NAZARENE FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue -97%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Shakespeare Festival Foundation
Arts & Culture
2
Autism Foundation of Utah
Health
3
Utah Geological Foundation
—
4
Real Salt Lake Foundation
Human Services
5
Utah Motorsports Foundation
Philanthropy
6
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
7
Northern Utah Cancer Foundation
—
8
Lightspark Foundation
Civil Rights
9
University of Utah Foundation

Provide support to the University of Utah Growth Capital Partners Foundation in Charitable, Educational and Scientific purposes.

Philanthropy
10
Economic Development Corporation of Utah Foundation

To serve as a catalyst for quality job growth and increased capital investment in the state.

Community Improvement
11
Utah Youth Sports Academy Foundation Fka Rsl Youth Academy Foundation
Recreation & Sports
12
Utah Swat Inc
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth Futures; the most unlike its peers is Sherry Black Foundation Fka Sherry Black Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

100 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 100 of the 132 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

14
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
94/100
Grantees still filing
61/100
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CROSSROADS OF THE WEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 590: $2,420,400 · OtherCROSSROADS OF THE WEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS …EQUITYTRUST FOUNDATION (LIBERTY & LIFE): $1,525,000 · OtherEQUITYTRUST FOUNDATION (LIBERTY & LIFE)THE NAZARENE FUND: $500,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $500,000 · OtherWORLD WIDE ADDICTION RECOVERY: $470,000 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS: $375,000 · Other+69 more: $5,025,702 · Other+69 moreWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY: $2,365,000 · EducationWESTMINSTER UNIVER…PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $800,000 · EducationPRAGER UNIVERSITY …CARDEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $800,000 · EducationCARDEN MEMORIAL FO…UTAH AUTISM ACADEMY: $200,000 · Education+4 more: $230,000 · EducationOUR RESCUE: $2,428,000 · Arts & CultureOUR RESCUEHALE CENTRE THEATRE: $1,000,000 · Arts & CultureHALE CENTRE THEAT…THIS IS THE PLACE FOUNDATION INC: $225,000 · Arts & CultureTHIS IS THE PLACE…+8 more: $340,000 · Arts & Culture+8 moreSaprea: $1,540,000 · HealthSapreaFight the New Drug Inc: $500,000 · HealthFight the N…INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $314,765 · HealthINTERMOUNTA…The Rachel Covey Foundation: $110,000 · Health+6 more: $215,000 · Health+6 moreCharityVision International: $1,580,000 · PhilanthropyWADE FAMILY FOUNDATION: $138,000 · PhilanthropyGREEN FEATHER FUND: $105,000 · Philanthropy+4 more: $67,000 · PhilanthropyElizabeth Smart Foundation: $575,000 · Human ServicesThe Rescue Fund: $250,000 · Human ServicesDONNIE EDWARDS BEST DEFENSE FOUNDATION: $150,000 · Human ServicesHEALING HANDS INCORPORATED: $120,000 · Human ServicesBACKCOUNTRY SANTA INC BACK: $100,000 · Human ServicesTHE INN BETWEEN: $70,000 · Human Services+12 more: $274,491 · Human ServicesLIBERTY AND LIGHT SPEAR FUND: $700,000 · Public BenefitATLANTIS USA FOUNDATION: $300,000 · Public BenefitTHE POLICY PROJECT: $160,000 · Public Benefit
Other$10,816,102Education$4,395,000Arts & Culture$3,993,000Health$2,679,765Philanthropy$1,890,000Human Services$1,539,491Public Benefit$1,160,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOUR RESCUE: $2,428,000 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetCROSSROADS OF THE WEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 590: $2,420,400 over 3y, 11% of budgetWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY: $2,365,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCharityVision International: $1,580,000 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetSaprea: $1,540,000 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetHALE CENTRE THEATRE: $1,000,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $800,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCARDEN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $800,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetLIBERTY AND LIGHT SPEAR FUND: $700,000 over 1y, 56% of budgetElizabeth Smart Foundation: $575,000 over 3y, 53% of budgetTHE NAZARENE FUND: $500,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFight the New Drug Inc: $500,000 over 2y, 73% of budgetTHANKSGIVING POINT INSTITUTE INC: $350,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $314,765 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetWine to Water: $300,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetATLANTIS USA FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 2y, 99% of budgetAERIAL RECOVERY: $300,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetSPORTSMEN FOR FISH & WILDLIFE INC: $275,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetThe Rescue Fund: $250,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetUSANA TRUE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $225,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetTHIS IS THE PLACE FOUNDATION INC: $225,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetUTAH AUTISM ACADEMY: $200,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR A SLAVERY FREE WORLD: $175,000 over 2y, 63% of budgetTHE POLICY PROJECT: $160,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetDONNIE EDWARDS BEST DEFENSE FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetSummit Journeys Inc: $148,000 over 2y, 34% of budgetUSANA KIDS EAT: $148,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetTHE LEGACY FILMS FOUNDATION: $145,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetWADE FAMILY FOUNDATION: $138,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetHEALING HANDS INCORPORATED: $120,000 over 2y, 55% of budgetThe Rachel Covey Foundation: $110,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetGREEN FEATHER FUND: $105,000 over 2y, 99% of budgetBACKCOUNTRY SANTA INC BACK: $100,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION: $100,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSHERRY BLACK FOUNDATION FKA SHERRY BLACK EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetKalene Advancement Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetJENNEY HOUSE MUSEUM INC: $100,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetUtah Venture Outdoors Inc: $87,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetTHE INN BETWEEN: $70,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetSalt Lake Community College Foundation: $60,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetBALLET WEST: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH FUTURES: $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetWATERFORD SCHOOL HOLDING CORPORATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMANAKI FO'OU: $50,000 over 1y, 52% of budgetSalt Lake Education Foundation: $42,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSANPETE PANTRY: $40,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy Found…George S and Dolores …Larry H Miller and Ga…The Community Foundat…Ihc Health Services I…Joseph and Kathleen S…McCarthey Family Foun…The Miner FoundationLawrence & Janet Dee …Kennecott Utah Copper…David Kelby Johnson M…Pacificorp Foundation…
Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT97.2× affinity48 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Ihc Health Services Inc · Joseph and Kathleen Sorenson Legacy Foun · McCarthey Family Foundation · The Miner Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation · Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joan and Tim Fenton Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joan and Tim Fenton Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Jenney House Museum Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
30report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Joan and Tim Fenton Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Joan and Tim Fenton Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 132 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joan and Tim Fenton Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home