· Private foundation
Jkw Foundation Tr Ua 092597
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k19 grants · $74k
- $10k–50k23 grants · $440k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $623k
- $250k+3 grants · $36M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DISTRACTED GLOBE FOUNDATION | $17,497,187 |
| KAT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC | $17,497,185 |
| PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC | $770,000 |
| ST ANN'S WAREHOUSE INC | $200,000 |
| ASSOCIATION FOR SLAVIC EAST EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN STUDIES | $88,000 |
| ASHEVILLE CREATIVE ARTS INC | $75,000 |
| ZACCHO S F | $60,000 |
| ANDRE CAILLOUX CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS AND CULTURAL JUSTICE | $50,000 |
| BARENBOIM-SAID FOUNDATION (USA) | $50,000 |
| ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI | $50,000 |
| JOURNALISM NEW ENGLAND | $50,000 |
| CRUSHING COLONIALISM | $42,000 |
| INSTITUTE FOR AMERICA'S FUTURE INC | $37,500 |
| ARTEQUITY COMMUNITY | $30,000 |
| UNDER THE RADAR FESTIVAL INC | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $88k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
85 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2025, 57 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TRTHE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE3× · 2022–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +37%
- SAST ANN'S WAREHOUSE INC5× · 2021–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +57%
- RTRESEARCH TO PREVENT BLINDNESS INC2× · 2021–2023 · $810k · revenue +54%
Funded once
- TATHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $150k · revenue 0%
- IFINSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIESone grant, 2021 · $125k · revenue -23%
- CCCHOOSE CHICAGO FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To produce bold theatre experiences that reach across artistic, physical and social boundries. We aim to increase empathy and open-mindedness by illuminating nuanced perspectives and unspoken truths behind the salient issues of our time.…
Pangea World Theater strives to build a just world by creating multi-disciplinary theater that embodies decolonizing practices of solidarity, sustainability and equity.
Mixed Blood Theatre Company uses theater to disrupt injustice. We are a social justice organization catalyzing action and change through art. Our work is guided by deep community engagement and rooted in radical hospitality.
To create rousing, visceral, enlightening theatre experiences that galvanize diverse artists and audiences to engage with our world in unexpected and often challenging ways.
On the Boards' mission is to invest in leading contemporary performing artists near and far and connect them to a diverse range of communities interested in forward-thinking art and ideas.
As creative producers, we are devoted to the production and presentation of groundbreaking experiences in contemporary performance that use innovative approaches to collaboration, technology, and social engagement. As a service…
Profile theatres mission is to produce a season of first-class productions and community engagement activities centered around a season-long featured writer whose vision broadens our perspective on the world and deepens our collective…
To provide an artistic home for the development and production of contemporary plays that engage and challenge a diverse audience.
The Theater of the Emerging American Moment, Inc. (The TEAM), is a Brooklyn-based theatre ensemble whose mission is to collaboratively create new works about the experience of living in America today, and to generate dialogue about our…
Studio Theatre produces exceptional contemporary theatre in deliberately intimate spaces, fostering a more thoughtful, more empathetic, and more connected community, in Washington DC and beyond.
A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Springboard for the Arts and the most unlike its peers is Bob's Living Proof Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
219 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 219 of the 243 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DISTRACTED GLOBE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KAT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ST ANN'S WAREHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds RESEARCH TO PREVENT BLINDNESS INC ↗
- Who funds artEquity Community ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR SLAVIC EAST EUROPEAN AND EURASIAN STUDIES ↗
- Who funds CONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS CENTER ↗
- Who funds NATION FUND FOR INDEPENDENT JOURNALISMINC ↗
- Who funds NOTCH THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds BARENBOIM-SAID FOUNDATION (USA) ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAS FUTURE INC ↗
- Who funds ASHEVILLE CREATIVE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOUR FREEDOMS PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OAKLAND THEATER PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ANDRE CAILLOUX CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds THE TANK LTD ↗
- Who funds The Center for Investigative Reporting Inc ↗
- Who funds Kopkind Colony ↗
- Who funds UTAH FILM CENTER ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY FOR LAW & POLICY ↗
- Who funds LA MAMA EXPERIMENTAL THEATRE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds THE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds FUSE BOX AUSTIN ↗
- Who funds Deep Medicine Circle ↗
- Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
- Who funds CHOOSE CHICAGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds City Report Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BARROW GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds Roots Action Education Fund ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds PowerCorpsPHL ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds Friends of Jackson Park ↗
- Who funds ELAINE LEGACY CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Distracted Globe Foundation · The Shubert Foundation Inc · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · New England Foundation for the Arts Incorporated · The Map Fund Inc · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · Mid Atlantic Arts Inc · Alliance of Resident Theatres New York Inc · The Ford Foundation · The Tow Foundation Inc · Axe-Houghton Foundation · Tides Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jkw Foundation Tr Ua 092597 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Boston Dance Alliance Inc — 5% of income from government
- Round House Theatre Inc — 5% of income from government
- Craft Institute Inc — 3% of income from government
- Double Edge Theatre Productions Inc — 2% of income from government
- Bread & Puppet Theatre Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jkw Foundation Tr Ua 092597?
Find your warmest path to Jkw Foundation Tr Ua 092597 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.