· Private foundation
Jkd Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ROMAN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL | $12,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,030 |
| ST CHARLES BORROMO SEMINARY | $6,000 |
| BIKING FOR BABIES | $1,886 |
| MARY MOTHER OF THE REDEMEER CHURCH | $1,500 |
| GEORGE BOYLE SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $1,250 |
| LEGACY OF LIFE FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| CRISTO RAY PHILADEPHIA HIGH SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| MOTHER'S HOME | $1,000 |
| SOUTH JERSEY CATHOLIC MINISTRY | $1,000 |
| ARCHDIOCESE OF PHILADELPHIA | $1,000 |
| LISA'S ARMY | $1,000 |
| OCEAN CITY POLICE OFFICER NONPROFIT | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +1% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MHMOTHERS' HOME4× · 2021–2025 · $17k · revenue +1%
- LOLEGACY OF LIFE FOUNDATION INC4× · 2021–2025 · $4k · revenue +93%
- BFBIKING FOR BABIES3× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- TKTHE KINGS MENone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -7%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Protect life of the unborn and provide housing and life skills for homeless pregnant women and mothers with new babies that are accepted into our maternaty home program
Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.
The organization is a pregnancy counseling service dedicated to promoting the sanctity of human life by providing education and christ centered counseling, guidance, and support for pregnant women.
The mission of hope pregnancy resource center is to reach out in love with life affirming services that empower parents to choose life for their unborn babies. our christ-centered ministry strives to bring about an abortion free community…
Education and information to promote life from birth to natural death
Prevent abortion by wearing a life-saving message.
Lighthouse pregnancy center, of fayette county, is a christ-centered ministry that acknowledges the absolute worth of all human life and exists to provide accurate information, compassionate care, and practical assistance to those affected…
The organization provides support to women in crisis pregnancy which includes guidance services, counseling, pregnancy test and referrals to other agencies
Sharing the gospel message and upholding the sanctity of human life by demonstrating the love of Christ to men and women facing unplanned pregnancies by providing spiritual, physical, and emotional support.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helphopelive Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Kings Men. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Saint Josephs Family Hope Center ↗
- Who funds MOTHERS' HOME ↗
- Who funds THE KINGS MEN ↗
- Who funds LEGACY OF LIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LISAS ARMY INC ↗
- Who funds BIKING FOR BABIES ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE COUNTY PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
- Who funds HELPHOPELIVE INC ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Orlando Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ALS Hope Foundation ↗
- Who funds Faith Wins ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GENERATION LIFE ↗
- Who funds OCEAN CITY POLICE OFFICERS' ↗
- Who funds MIRACLE MOUNTAIN RANCH MISSIONS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LEGION POST 224 ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Connelly Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jkd Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.