How much did JKD FOUNDATION grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 81% of JKD FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2024

hopecatholic

2025

catholic

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k12 grants · $23k
$10k–50k2 grants · $23k

$1,250

Median grant

States reached

$189k

Total assets

Largest grants

ROMAN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$12,000
PRO- LIFE UNION$10,500
FIVE LOAVES MINI$6,030
ST CHARLES BORROMO SEMINARY$6,000
BIKING FOR BABIES$1,886
MARY MOTHER OF THE REDEMEER CHURCH$1,500
GEORGE BOYLE SCHOLARSHIP FUND$1,250
LISA'S ARMY$1,000
SOUTH JERSEY CATHOLIC MINISTRY$1,000
MOTHER'S HOME$1,000
LEGACY OF LIFE FOUNDATION$1,000
ARCHDIOCESE OF PHILADELPHIA$1,000
CRISTO RAY PHILADEPHIA HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
OCEAN CITY POLICE OFFICER NONPROFIT$100

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 9%. 64% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$152k · 13 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +377% since the first grant, against +80% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$152k

$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+377%

+80%

Still filing today

23%

30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthReligionHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PL
PRO- LIFE UNION
4× · 2022–2025 · $42k
RC
ROMAN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL
4× · 2022–2025 · $35k
F
FOCUS
3× · 2022–2024 · $17k

Funded once

FP
FAMILY PROMISE OF DELAWARE COUNTYgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +80%
TK
THE KINGS MENgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +37%
RV
REDMAN V WOLF
one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Pregnancy & Family Life Center

The Pregnancy and Family Life Center is a Christian ministry with a mission to: Engage, Educate and Empower women and men to choose life through a wholistic approach

Human Services

Hope Resource Center Inc

Life affirming ministry

Health

Hope Crisis Pregnancy Center

The mission of hope pregnancy resource center is to reach out in love with life affirming services that empower parents to choose life for their unborn babies. our christ-centered ministry strives to bring about an abortion free community…

—

Life Choices Medical Clinic

Life choices medical clinic exists to minister to the underserved in our community who are in need of pregnancy services and comprehensive womenaposs health care. we serve our patients with love, compassion and a committment to excellence…

Unclassified

Hope for Life Pregnancy Center of

Hope for life pregnancy center is a christ-centered, pro-life ministry, committed to sharing the good news of jesus christ and upholding the sanctity of life by providing compassionate, life-affirming services to women, men, and families…

Human Services

Hope Pregnancy and Resource Center

Hope pregnancy and resource center (center) is a non-profit ministry. the center was formed to bring compassionate help and hope to women and teens that are unprepared for pregnancy, to present sexual abstinence as a positive lifestyle for…

Health

Life Choice Pregnancy Center of Western North Carolina

Choosing Life over Abortion

Human Services

Crisis Pregnancy Center of New Braunfels

Options for life is a christ centered organization dedicated to educating and encouraging people to chose life,to make positivesexual choices, and bring healing to those affected by abortion.

—

Hopeline Women's Center Inc

The organization is a pregnancy counseling service dedicated to promoting the sanctity of human life by providing education and christ centered counseling, guidance, and support for pregnant women.

Unclassified

Women for Life of Winchester Inc

Protection of the welfare of unborn children council, assistance, and promotion of the sanctity of human life in the context of Christian witness.

—

Life Choices Care

Life choices care exits to minister to the underserved in our community who are in need of pregancy services and comprehensive womenaposs health care. we serve our patients with love, compassion and a commitment to excellence so that we…

—

Pregnancy and Life Resource Center

Pregnancy and life resource center is a christian ministry. our mission is to share the love of our lord jesus christ by preserving the lives of unborn children, meeting the specific physical, emotional and spiritual needs of our clients…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Biking for Babies and the most unlike its peers is The Kings Men. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

10/10

Grantees still filing

9/10

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$190,969Housing & Shelter$20,000Religion$11,000Health$4,500Philanthropy$4,000Civil Rights$3,886Youth Development$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JKD FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FAMILY PROMISE OF DELAWARE COUNTY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +80% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 233090592 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on FAMILY PROMISE OF DELAWARE COUNTY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 16% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Jkd Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jkd Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JKD FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Jkd Foundation?

More from the funding graph

JKD FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Jkd Foundation?

More from the funding graph