Skip to content

· Private foundation

JJP Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$244k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$180k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$1.0MReligion$624kEducation$586kInternational$450kHuman Services$425kHealth$205kYouth Development$125kArts & Culture$112kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $180k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Food Bank of the Rockies$180,000
ENDOW$20,000
SECOR$15,000
Aurora Public Schools Foundation$10,000
Tap Cancer Out$10,000
Catholic Sports$5,000
The Labore Society$2,500
Nourish Colorado$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $10k → 26%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 25% of JJP Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in CO; by stated purpose, 76%.

JJP Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 22 repeat orgs$404k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
16

Total granted

$3.4M
$385k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+79%

Still filing today

41%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionInternationalHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +74%
  • TC
    THE COLORADO COLLEGE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $270k · revenue +39%
  • ID
    INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES
    3× · 2021–2023 · $250k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • RJ
    REGIS JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • DH
    DOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +12%
  • DC
    DENVER CENTER FOR THE ARTS
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities & Community Serv of the Archdiocese of Denver

As the charitable arm of the archdiocese of denver and inspired by god's love and compassion, catholic charities extends the healing ministry of jesus christ to the poor and those in need. catholic charities of the archdiocese of denver…

Human Services
2
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
3
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
4
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
5
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
6
Public Broadcasting of Colorado Inc

To deliver meaningful news, music, and cultural experiences to everyone in colorado using the power of the human voice in all its forms

Arts & Culture
7
Center for Improving Value in Health Care

To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…

Health
8
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
9
Colorado Nonprofit Association

Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.

Community Improvement
10
Impact Development Fund

Impact development fund helps people within our underserved communities seek fulfillment for themselves and their families by providing access to affordable living. we create these opportunities by delivering flexible capital to nonprofit…

Housing & Shelter
11
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
12
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Catholic Foundation No Colorado; the most unlike its peers is Young Americans Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
18/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $335,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIESCAPUCHIN PROVINCE: $275,000 · OtherCAPUCHIN PROVINCEARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER - ANNUNCIATION: $177,562 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER - ANNUNCIATIONARRUPE JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $125,000 · OtherARRUPE JESUIT HIGH SCHOOLREGIS JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $100,000 · OtherREGIS JESUIT HIGH SCHOOLBELLA FOUNDATION: $85,000 · OtherCOLORADO OPEN LANDS: $100,000 · OtherCOLORADO OPEN LANDS+26 more: $526,000 · Other+26 moreFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $1,014,877 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIESSECOR: $40,000 · Food & NutritionINTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES: $250,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONA…LALMBA ASSOCIATION: $175,000 · InternationalLALMBA ASSOC…THE COLORADO COLLEGE: $270,000 · EducationAlternatives Pregnancy Center Inc: $135,000 · HealthDOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC: $50,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthYOUNG AMERICANS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $125,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION NO COLORADO: $115,000 · ReligionCATHOLIC SPORTS: $5,000 · Religion
Other$1,723,562Food & Nutrition$1,054,877International$425,000Education$270,000Health$186,000Youth Development$125,000Religion$120,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $1,014,877 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $270,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES: $250,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLALMBA ASSOCIATION: $175,000 over 4y, 7.1% of budgetAlternatives Pregnancy Center Inc: $135,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetYOUNG AMERICANS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION NO COLORADO: $115,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCOLORADO OPEN LANDS: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetENDOW: $55,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetDOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSECOR: $40,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetANGELICA VILLAGE: $25,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetAurora Public Schools Foundation: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF DENVER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC SPORTS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES ↗
  • Who funds LALMBA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Alternatives Pregnancy Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG AMERICANS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION NO COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO OPEN LANDS ↗
  • Who funds ENDOW ↗
  • Who funds DOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOR ↗
  • Who funds ANGELICA VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds Aurora Public Schools Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Tap Cancer Out Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC SPORTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Denver FoundationCO27.7× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Daniels Fund · Mile High United Way Inc · Rose Community Foundation · Heider Family Foundation Co Susan H Coleman · The Catholic Foundation No Colorado · Xcel Energy Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Janus Henderson Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization JJP Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from JJP Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on JJP Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph