Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jim & Susan Neuberger Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$230k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$426kEducation$330kHousing & Shelter$149kInternational$136kRecreation & Sports$20kHealth$18kHuman Services$15kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $207k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONASTERY OF THE HOLY CROSS$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
HAITI180$20,000
HOLY INNOCENTS$17,000
CRISTO REY OKC CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$15,000
INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
CARDINAL NEWMAN SOCIETY$15,000
ST CHARLES BORROMEO CATHOLIC SCHOOL$15,000
ASSUMPTION CATHOLIC SCHOOLS$10,000
CITY RESCUE MISSION$10,000
MAGIS CATHOLIC TEACHER CORP$10,000
CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY$10,000
THE SISTERS OF ST FRANCIS OF ASSISI$10,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $4k → 9%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 16%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $4k → 9%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 16%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $2k → 9%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 16%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $2k → 9%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $6k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $4k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $4k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
PA
CA
CO
NE
VA
TN
OK
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 27 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against -46% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
7

Total granted

$1.2M
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
-46%

Still filing today

33%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationRecreation & SportsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CN
    CARDINAL NEWMAN SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF CATHOLIC HGR ED
    9× · 2017–2025 · $87k · revenue +46%
  • CU
    Creighton University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $71k · revenue +48%
  • HI
    HAITI180 INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $63k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF OK INC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • SG
    ST GREGORY'S UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -93%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
2
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
3
University of Notre Dame du Lac

See Schedule O. See explanation for Form 990, Part I, Line 1 - Organization's Mission above.

Education
4
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
5
Our Lady of the Lake University of San Antonio

As a catholic university sponsored by the sisters of divine providence, our lady of the lake university is a community whose members are committed to serve students by: (continued on schedule o).

Education
6
St John's University New York

St. john's university is a catholic, vincentian, metropolitan, and global institution of higher education (continued on schedule o).

Education
7
Saint John's University

To foster the vitality of community through learning and the pursuit of wisdom.

—
8
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
9
Cardinal Stritch University Inc

Cardinal stritch university is a comprehensive, coeducational, institution offering educational programs leading to associate, baccalaureate, masters and doctoral degrees in a variety of disciplines provided through its three colleges:…

Education
10
Avila University

Avila university, a catholic university sponsored by saint joseph educational ministries, a ministerial public juridic person of the catholic church (sjem), is a values-based community of learning providing liberal arts, professional,…

Education
11
Association of Catholic Colleges and University

The association of catholic colleges and universities, founded in 1899, serves as the collective voice of u.s catholic higher education. through programs and services, the association strengthens and promptes the catholic identity and…

—
12
Cabrini Legacy Corporation

See schedule o.education of the heart: cabrini university was a catholic institution of higher education. the cabrini legacy corporation exists to protect the legacy of the former university.cabrini university was a catholic institution of…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Answers Inc; the most unlike its peers is HAITI180 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MONASTERY OF THE HOLY CROSS: $226,000 · OtherMONASTERY OF THE HOLY CROSSINTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY INCORPORATION: $73,000 · OtherINTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY INCORPORATIONIndividual grant recipient: $70,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCRISTO REY OKLAHOMA CITY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC: $64,000 · OtherCRISTO REY OKLAHOMA CITY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INCST CHARLES BORROMEO CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $62,400 · OtherST CHARLES BORROMEO CATHOLIC SCHOOLHOLY INNOCENTS: $47,500 · OtherCHURCH OF THE EPIPHANY: $46,800 · OtherLUMEN CHRISTI INSTITUTE: $41,500 · OtherMAGIS CATHOLIC TEACHER CORP: $38,500 · OtherASSUMPTION HIGH SCHOOL: $32,500 · Other+17 more: $141,072 · Other+17 moreCARDINAL NEWMAN SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF CATHOLIC HGR ED: $87,000 · Housing & ShelterHAITI180 INC: $63,000 · ReligionCatholic Foundation of Oklahoma Inc: $12,000 · ReligionCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $61,500 · Human ServicesThe Center of Family Love: $12,200 · Human ServicesCreighton University: $71,000 · EducationNorthwestern University: $20,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$913,772Housing & Shelter$87,000Religion$75,000Human Services$73,700Education$71,000Recreation & Sports$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCARDINAL NEWMAN SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF CATHOLIC HGR ED: $87,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetCreighton University: $71,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHAITI180 INC: $63,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $61,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLUMEN CHRISTI INSTITUTE: $41,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetNorthwestern University: $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC ANSWERS INC: $16,472 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Center of Family Love: $12,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCatholic Foundation of Oklahoma Inc: $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST GREGORY'S UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL STROKE ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CARDINAL NEWMAN SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF CATHOLIC HGR ED ↗
  • Who funds Creighton University ↗
  • Who funds HAITI180 INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds LUMEN CHRISTI INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC ANSWERS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Center of Family Love ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Foundation of Oklahoma Inc ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST GREGORY'S UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL STROKE ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jim & Susan Neuberger Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jim & Susan Neuberger Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jim & Susan Neuberger Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jim & Susan Neuberger Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jim & Susan Neuberger’s filings →

More from the funding graph