Skip to content
Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$445k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.4MEducation$1.1MReligion$169kPhilanthropy$111kRecreation & Sports$109kHuman Services$35kArts & Culture$23kSocial Science$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $73k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$18,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MHR DONATION FUND$250,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$50,000
MOUNT SINAI CHILDREN'S CENTER FOUNDATION$50,000
THE JEWISH BOARD$30,000
MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FUND$25,000
CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE$18,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY$6,000
DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION$5,000
SH BATH & TENNIS CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$4,500
CROHNS & COLITIS FOUNDATION$2,500
OXALOSIS AND HYPEROXALURIA FOUNDATION$2,000
TOWN OF PALM BEACH UNITED WAY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $311k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%THE JEWISH BOARD: $100k → 17%THE JEWISH BOARD: $50k → 17%THE JEWISH BOARD: $30k → 17%THE JEWISH BOARD: $30k → 17%THE JEWISH BOARD: $25k → 17%THE JEWISH BOARD: $25k → 17%THE JEWISH BOARD: $25k → 17%THE JEWISH BOARD: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 34 repeat orgs$418k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
33

Total granted

$1.6M
$168k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+5%

Still filing today

53%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JB
    JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $310k · revenue +5%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    7× · 2017–2024 · $163k · revenue +202%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $35k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • SY
    SAY YES TO EDUCATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -100%
  • MH
    MORSELIFE HEALTH SYSTEM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +29%
  • HI
    HAMPTONS INVITATIONAL CHARITABLE FUND INC
    one grant, 2021 · $14k · revenue -99%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
4
Nyu Langone Health System

The board adopted mission statement is: the corporation is operated exclusively for the benefit of nyu langone hospitals and its affiliated organizations. in this capacity, the corporation, may, in order to improve the health and welfare…

Health
5
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
8
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
9
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Nyu Langone Hospitals

The board adopted mission statement is: nyu langone hospitals (the "hospital") will operate with new york university's medical schools a health system ("nyu langone health") devoted to excellence in patient care, education and research. in…

Health
11
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
23/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MHR DONATION FUND: $250,000 · OtherMHR DONATION FUNDCENTRAL SYNAGOGUE: $169,000 · OtherCENTRAL SYNAGOGUEUniversity of Michigan: $163,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganTHE MOUNT SINAI CHILDREN'S CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 · OtherTHE MOUNT SINAI CHILDREN'S CENTER FOUNDATION INCTRINITY SCHOOL: $101,750 · OtherTRINITY SCHOOLMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FUND: $75,000 · OtherMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FUNDMT SINAI CHILDRENS CTR FOUNDATION: $75,000 · OtherMT SINAI CHILDRENS CTR FOUNDATION+36 more: $324,160 · Other+36 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $800,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND …THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $150,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY …+2 more: $10,000 · EducationJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $310,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH BOAR…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $115,000 · HealthTHE MOUNT …THE ORPHAN DISEASE PATHWAY PROJECT: $90,000 · HealthTHE ORPHAN…VAL SKINNER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · HealthVAL SKINNE…CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $12,280 · HealthDYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION INC DBA FAMILIAL DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $10,000 · HealthNEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Health+3 more: $5,000 · HealthJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $48,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropyATLANTIC GOLF CLUB EDUCATIONAL FUND INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropySOUTHAMPTON BATH & TENNIS CLUB CHARITABLE FUND: $16,150 · PhilanthropyHAMPTONS INVITATIONAL CHARITABLE FUND INC: $13,500 · PhilanthropyTHE ATLANTIC GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION: $12,244 · Philanthropy+2 more: $8,500 · PhilanthropyTHE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM: $5,000 · Arts & CultureJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureCULTURE FOR ONE: $1,000 · Arts & CultureALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SYLVIA CENTER: $3,200 · Food & NutritionBROWN UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · Community Improvement
Other$1,262,910Education$960,000Human Services$311,000Health$272,280Philanthropy$153,394Arts & Culture$9,500Food & Nutrition$3,200Community Improvement$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $800,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $310,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $163,000 over 7y, 17% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $150,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $115,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI CHILDREN'S CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetTHE ORPHAN DISEASE PATHWAY PROJECT: $90,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $48,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK JUNIOR TENNIS LEAGUE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAY YES TO EDUCATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMORSELIFE HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetATLANTIC GOLF CLUB EDUCATIONAL FUND INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetVAL SKINNER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetSOUTHAMPTON BATH & TENNIS CLUB CHARITABLE FUND: $16,150 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetHAMPTONS INVITATIONAL CHARITABLE FUND INC: $13,500 over 1y, 20% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $12,280 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ATLANTIC GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION: $12,244 over 3y, 18% of budgetDYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION INC DBA FAMILIAL DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALM BEACH COUNTRY CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREP FOR PREP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR HEARING AND COMMUNICATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Way of Palm Beach County Inc: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTown of Palm Beach United Way Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SYLVIA CENTER: $3,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Oxalosis & Hyperoxaluria Foundation: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE HANDICAPPED INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT LYME: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCULTURE FOR ONE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundThe Goldman Sachs Cha…The Robbins Family Fo…Daniel L Nir & Jill E…Gs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Vanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…
Jewish Communal FundNY20.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Robbins Family Foundation · Daniel L Nir & Jill E Braufman Family Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • United Way of Palm Beach County Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jill and Mark Rachesky’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home