Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$445k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
12
Grants FY2024
17
Organizations funded FY2023
35%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$18,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$250,000
Organizations funded a year
14 to 24
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
4
Total assets, FY2024
$9.0M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 35% of the organizations Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 39% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $94k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving11$439k9%
FY202317$241k35%
FY202224$290k54%
FY202114$140k64%
FY202016$164k44%
FY201922$246k27%
FY201822$199k36%
FY201718$251kn/a
96% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.4MEducation$1.1MReligion$169kPhilanthropy$111kRecreation & Sports$109kHuman Services$35kArts & Culture$23kSocial Science$10kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 34 grantees
All grantees of Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Jewish Board of Family & Children's Services Inc$310,00080%
Central Synagogue$169,0008n/a
University of Michigan$163,000717%
The Mount Sinai Medical Center$115,000417%
The Mount Sinai Children's Center Foundation Inc$105,00027%
The Orphan Disease Pathway Project$90,00024%
United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc$35,00020%
New York Junior Tennis League Inc$30,00030%
Say Yes to Education Inc$25,00010%
Morselife Health System Inc$25,00010%
Atlantic Golf Club Educational Fund Inc$20,00021%
Val Skinner Foundation Inc$20,00022%
Southampton Bath & Tennis Club Charitable Fund$16,15041%
Hamptons Invitational Charitable Fund Inc$13,500120%
Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc$12,28050%
The Atlantic Golf Club Foundation$12,244318%
Dysautonomia Foundation Inc Dba Familial Dysautonomia Foundation$10,00020%
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc$10,00010%
New York STEM Cell Foundation Inc$10,00010%
Palm Beach Country Club Foundation Inc$9,00070%
The Studio Museum in Harlem$5,00010%
Prep for Prep$5,00010%
Center for Hearing and Communication$5,00010%
United Way of Palm Beach County Inc$4,50030%
Town of Palm Beach United Way Inc$4,00020%
The Sylvia Center$3,20020%
The Oxalosis & Hyperoxaluria Foundation$3,00020%
Foundation for the Handicapped Inc$3,00031%
Jazz at Lincoln Center Inc$2,50010%
Project Lyme$1,00010%
Culture for One$1,00011%
American Heart Association Inc$1,00010%
Challenged Athletes Inc$1,00010%
Alvin Ailey Dance Foundation Inc$1,00010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 34 recipients with no EIN on record ($729k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJewish Board of Family & Children's Services Inc: $310,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $163,000 over 7y, 17% of budgetThe Mount Sinai Medical Center: $115,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetThe Mount Sinai Children's Center Foundation Inc: $105,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetThe Orphan Disease Pathway Project: $90,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetUnited Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew York Junior Tennis League Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSay Yes to Education Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMorselife Health System Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAtlantic Golf Club Educational Fund Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetVal Skinner Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetSouthampton Bath & Tennis Club Charitable Fund: $16,150 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetHamptons Invitational Charitable Fund Inc: $13,500 over 1y, 20% of budgetCrohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc: $12,280 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Atlantic Golf Club Foundation: $12,244 over 3y, 18% of budgetDysautonomia Foundation Inc Dba Familial Dysautonomia Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York STEM Cell Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPalm Beach Country Club Foundation Inc: $9,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetThe Studio Museum in Harlem: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPrep for Prep: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for Hearing and Communication: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Way of Palm Beach County Inc: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTown of Palm Beach United Way Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Sylvia Center: $3,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Oxalosis & Hyperoxaluria Foundation: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFoundation for the Handicapped Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetJazz at Lincoln Center Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProject Lyme: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCulture for One: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChallenged Athletes Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlvin Ailey Dance Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 33.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY20.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Robbins Family Foundation · Daniel L Nir & Jill E Braufman Family Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation

How much does Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation give?
Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation reported 12 grants totaling $445,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 14 and 24 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (47%), Education (38%), Religion (6%).
Who are Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Jewish Board of Family & Children's Services Inc ($310k), Central Synagogue ($169k), University of Michigan ($163k).
Does Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 35% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Communal Fund, The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund, The Robbins Family Foundation.
Where is Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation based?
Jill and Mark Rachesky Charitable Foundation is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jill and Mark Rachesky’s filings →

More from the funding graph