Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Jewish Federation of Madison Inc

To inspire, build, and sustain vibrant jewish life by fostering diverse opportunities to connect at every age and mobilizing our community in common purpose, in madison, israel, and around the world.

$518k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$321k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

70% of Jewish Federation of Madison Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Jewish Federations Of North America Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’17
8
’18
8
’19
8
’20
13
’21
8
’22
6
’23
6
’24
6
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Philanthropy$2.7MHuman Services$596kReligion$491kYouth Development$55kEducation$39kFood & Nutrition$32kMembership Benefit$16kCivil Rights$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $472,180 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $517,956 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $45,776 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $58k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
  • $250k+1 grant · $321k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA$321,411
JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES$60,800
HILLEL FOUNDATION - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN$38,000
WISCONSIN FAITH VOICES FOR JUSTICE$20,000
UW CHABAD HOUSE$8,775
WISCONSIN JEWISH CONFERENCE$8,550
BETH ISRAEL CENTER$8,200
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON EVALUATION COLLABORATIVE$6,444
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 66% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $339k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $321k → 17%RACE PLACE COALITION INC: $10k → 10%JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $309k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $296k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $288k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $286k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $285k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $275k → 17%JASON TERRY FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $234k → 17%HILLEL FOUNDATION - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $53k → 10%HILLEL FOUNDATION - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $52k → 10%HILLEL FOUNDATION - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $42k → 10%HILLEL FOUNDATION - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $41k → 10%HILLEL FOUNDATION - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $41k → 10%HILLEL FOUNDATION - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $40k → 10%HILLEL FOUNDATION - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $39k → 10%HILLEL FOUNDATION - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $38k → 10%HILLEL FOUNDATION - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $37k → 10%CENTER FOR COMMUNITY STEWARDSHIP: $20k → 10%UW CHABAD HOUSE: $10k → 10%WISCONSIN JEWISH CONFERENCE: $9k → 10%UW CHABAD HOUSE: $9k → 10%WISCONSIN JEWISH CONFERENCE: $9k → 10%WISCONSIN JEWISH CONFERENCE: $9k → 10%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES: $68k → 10%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES: $68k → 10%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES: $68k → 10%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES: $67k → 10%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES: $66k → 10%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES: $66k → 10%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES: $64k → 10%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES: $61k → 10%JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES: $61k → 10%WISCONSIN FAITH VOICES FOR JUSTICE: $20k → 10%WISCONSIN FAITH VOICES FOR JUSTICE: $20k → 10%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY: $35k → 10%WISCONSIN FAITH VOICES FOR JUSTICE: $10k → 10%LITERACY NETWORK: $10k → 10%BETH ISRAEL OF MADISON: $12k → 10%MADISON JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL: $11k → 10%MADISON JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL: $11k → 10%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DANE COUNTY: $10k → 10%TEMPLE BETH EL OF MADISON: $10k → 10%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DANE COUNTY: $10k → 10%TEMPLE BETH EL OF MADISON: $10k → 10%TEMPLE BETH EL OF MADISON: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 66% of Jewish Federation of Madison Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Jewish Federation of Madison Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 14 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

$1.2M
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+15%

Still filing today

64%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationCivil RightsInternationalEmploymentCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JS
    JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES OF MADISON INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $587k · revenue +256%
  • HF
    HILLEL FOUNDATION UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $381k · revenue +172%
  • CA
    CHABAD AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $40k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $35k · revenue -28%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR COMMUNITY STEWARDSHIP
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -22%
  • LN
    LITERACY NETWORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +69%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
—
2
Jewish Federation of Madison Inc

To inspire, build, and sustain vibrant jewish life by fostering diverse opportunities to connect at every age and mobilizing our community in common purpose, in madison, israel, and around the world.

Religion
3
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
—
4
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
5
Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago

Juf provides critical resources that bring food, refuge, health care, education and emergency assistance to over 500,000 chicagoans of all faiths and millions of jews in israel and around the world, funding a network of 100+ agencies,…

Philanthropy
6
Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas)
—
7
Hillel Milwaukee

To promote and educate the general public regarding the jewish religion and culture and to provide services to jewish college students through various relevant programs

—
8
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
9
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
10
United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc

Uja-federation of new york (uja) cares for jews everywhere and new yorkers of all backgrounds, responds to crises close to home and far away, and shapes the jewish future. through strategic grantmaking, uja provides funding and resources…

Philanthropy
11
The Jerusalem Connection
—
12
The University of Iowa Louis Shulman Hillel Foundation

The mission of Iowa Hillel is to enhance the lives of Jewish students at the University of Iowa, so they may enrich the Jewish people and the world. Iowa Hillel envisions a world for our students where they find a community here at Iowa…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Social Services of Madison Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jason Terry Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%10%<5yr13%10%5–10yr21%14%10–20yr21%19%20–35yr14%10%35–55yr13%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%15%<5yr13%2%5–10yr21%10%10–20yr21%2%20–35yr14%1%35–55yr13%70%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 15% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
10%
2,463/24,288

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $2,634,290 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC+1 more — $65,460 · PhilanthropyJEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES OF MADISON INC — $587,378 · OtherJEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE…TEMPLE BETH EL — $32,000 · Other+13 more — $121,945 · Other+13 moreHILLEL FOUNDATION UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN INC — $380,948 · ReligionHILLEL FOUNDA…WISCONSIN FAITH VOICES FOR JUSTICE — $50,000 · ReligionWISCONSIN FAI…CHABAD AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN INC — $40,375 · ReligionCHABAD AT THE…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY INC — $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentCENTER FOR COMMUNITY STEWARDSHIP — $20,000 · Community ImprovementLITERACY NETWORK INC — $10,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $6,444 · EducationJEWISH BURIAL ASSOCIATION OF MADISON INC — $15,900 · Membership Benefit
Philanthropy$2,699,750Other$741,323Religion$471,323Youth Development$35,000Community Improvement$20,000Education$16,444Membership Benefit$15,900

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $2,634,290 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH SOCIAL SERVICES OF MADISON INC — $587,378 over 9y, 7.1% of budgetHILLEL FOUNDATION UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN INC — $380,948 over 9y, 5.6% of budgetMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $65,460 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN FAITH VOICES FOR JUSTICE — $50,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetCHABAD AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN INC — $40,375 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY INC — $35,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DANE COUNTY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY STEWARDSHIP — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH BURIAL ASSOCIATION OF MADISON INC — $15,900 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetJEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC — $11,190 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLITERACY NETWORK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $6,444 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $4,242 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC — $880 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH LABOR COMMITTEE — $420 over 4y, 0.0% of budget70 FACES MEDIA INC — $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Irving & Dorothy Levy…Irwin a and Robert D …United Way of Dane Co…Madison Community Fou…Baird Foundation IncGe Aerospace Foundati…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Paypal Charitable Giv…
Irving & Dorothy Levy Family FoundationWI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Irving & Dorothy Levy Family Foundation · Irwin a and Robert D Goodman Foundation Inc · United Way of Dane County Inc · Madison Community Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jewish Federation of Madison Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home