· Public charity
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Pittsburgh
Jewish family and children's service supports people through life's changes and challenges while providing quality and affordable social services.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $1,713,828 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,585,107 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,871,279 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $46k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $508k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HELLO NEIGHBOR | $397,940 |
| AJAPO | $389,532 |
| LITERACY PITTSBURGH | $372,345 |
| BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES | $198,291 |
| SOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MOVEMENT | $125,000 |
| CASA SAN JOSE | $111,417 |
| ALLEGHENY INTERMEDIATE UNIT | $73,778 |
| PGH HISPANIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $33,525 |
| BCAP | $12,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $410k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LPLITERACY PITTSBURGH9× · 2017–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +208%
- SHSOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +105%
- NANORTHERN AREA MULTI-SERVICE CENTER OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY INC2× · 2017–2018 · $307k · revenue +41%
Funded once
- PHPGH HISPANIC DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITYone grant, 2023 · $26k
- ACAUTISM CONNECTION OF PAgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +41%
- GEGIANT EAGLE INCone grant, 2019 · $12k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provides free immigration legal services to immigrants, refugees, foreign-born individuals and their family members who reside in pennsylvania. individuals receiving the services are those who are unable to afford the services of a private…
The world affairs council of pittsburgh's mission is to convene and connect people around global issues to build a competitive, thriving, and inclusive pittsburgh.
The corporation's mission includes, but is not limited to, combatingcommunity deterioration within chinatown; preserving and developingthe chinatown community; leading the community in neighborhoodplanning, considering land use, and…
To advocate and organize so that immigrants and refugees feel a sense of belonging and self-sufficiency. The mission is achieved by facilitating access to health and social services.
To provide high quality civil legal assistance and other services to indigent individuals and families.
Provide programs to help individuals and/or families achieve self-sufficiency.
Asylee Women Enterprise (AWE), journeys with asylum seekers and other forced migrants as they navigate the immigration legal process, begin to heal from past trauma, and rebuild their lives in Baltimore.
To serve and empower marginalized and vulnerable community members with support resources and social services.
To recruit and train community members to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children.
The global switchboard stewards a diverse network of people and organizations to promote equitable global engagement in the pittsburgh region. we strive to build a region where all people value diversity, practice empathy, and work…
Providing social services and placement. Working with refugees and immigrant for placement and healthy transition into new communities
Connections work changes lives and improves communities by providing services and supports to individuals seeking pathways to success.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bhutanese Community Association of Pittsburgh and the most unlike its peers is The Consortium for Public Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LITERACY PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds ACCULTURATION FOR JUSTICE ACCESS & PEACE OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds SOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds HELLO NEIGHBOR ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN AREA MULTI-SERVICE CENTER OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NORTH HILLS COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds CASA SAN JOSE ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR REFUGEE YOUTH SUPPORT AND EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds Pittsburgh Hispanic Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds The Consortium for Public Education ↗
- Who funds AUTISM CONNECTION OF PA ↗
- Who funds BHUTANESE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds HIAS and Council Migration Service of Philadelphia Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Heinz Endowments · Hillman Family Foundations · The Grable Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation · Posner Foundation of Pittsburgh · Jefferson Regional Foundation · McElhattan Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation · Eqt Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jewish Family and Children's Service of Pittsburgh funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.