Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Jevs Human Services

See description on schedule oJEVS HUMAN SERVICES (jevs) works with individuals to create sustainable paths to independence and economic security.

$16M
Granted FY2025still arriving
49
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$965k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0170% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2024–2025.

Education$3.0MYouth Development$1.1MRecreation & Sports$700kArts & Culture$291kHealth$265kCrime & Legal$221kHousing & Shelter$98kCommunity Improvement$85kHuman Services$55kOther$2.4M
02FY2025 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 49 grants below total $7,621,264 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $16,183,368 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $8,562,104 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $346k
  • $50k–250k27 grants · $3.3M
  • $250k+8 grants · $3.9M
$100,694
Median grant
2
States reached
$99M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION$964,666
SUNRISE OF PHILADELPHIA$527,510
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA VPSE$495,407
HEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA$485,309
PENN'S NETTER CENTER UNIVERSITY - ASSISTED COMMUNITY SCHOOL ST LEONARD'S C$453,951
EDUCATORS 4 EDUCATION LLC$371,758
PHILADELPHIA YOUTH NETWORK INC$358,427
SQUASHMARTS INC$255,684
EQUITY SOLUTIONS INC$221,927
CONGRESO DE LATINOS UNIDOS INC$217,739
GUIDING STARS AN ANTHONY C RICHARDSON LEE FOUNDATION$212,095
ZHANG SAH MARTIAL ARTS & LEARNING$210,226
CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES$168,434
LENFEST CENTER FOR COMMUNITY WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIPS$157,099
MURAL ARTS ADVOCATES$152,691
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GREATER PHILADELPHIA YMCA: $10k → 7%NORTH LIGHT COMMUNITY CENTERS: $16k → 22%VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES: $21k → 22%SOUTHEASTERN ASIAN MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION COALITION: $9k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.4M · 20 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +2% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
26

Total granted

$4.4M
$2.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
0%

Still filing today

90%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +8%
  • HP
    HEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $617k · revenue +20%
  • SO
    SUNRISE OF PHILADELPHIA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $559k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • E4
    EDUCATORS 4 EDUCATION LLC
    one grant, 2025 · $372k
  • PY
    PHILADELPHIA YOUTH NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2025 · $358k · revenue 0%
  • SI
    SQUASHSMARTS INC
    one grant, 2025 · $256k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philadelphia Academy of School Leaders Inc

We develop, engage, and retain principals and system leaders who transform schools, dramatically improve student outcomes, and drive systemic change to prepare all philadelphia students for college, career, and life.

Education
2
Youth Enrichment Services Inc

Youth enrichment services, inc. was founded in 1994 for the purpose of providing at-risk teens and low-income families residing in allegheny county a comprehensive in-home peer mentoring program, juvenile alternative to detention,…

Human Services
3
Youthbuild Dc Public Charter School Inc

Youthbuild pcs seeks to transform the lives of disconnected youth by offering a program, in english and spanish, that combines rigorous academic instruction with vocational training, life and employability skills- building, and community…

Education
4
Philadelphia Health Services Inc

Mentoring and educational programs for female youth

Youth Development
5
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
6
Youth Empowerment Services

To re-engage out-of-school youth with alternative educational programs and job connections, life skills training,counseling, media and technology skills

Education
7
Springside Chestnut Hill Academy

See schedule owe are an inclusive community on a mission to inspire unbounded curiosity and independent thought in every one of our students. in a unique educational environment that extends well beyond campus, we nurture students'…

Education
8
Philadelphia Youth for Change Charter School Inc

To empower young adults (17-20 year-olds) to develop skills and connect to opportunities by fostering an environment of love, support, and respect for their whole person. students graduate high school and successfully transition to college…

Education
9
Belmont Alliance Civic Association

Community development resources

Youth Development
10
Achieveability

Strives to permanently break the cycle of poverty for philadelphia families

Housing & Shelter
11
Communities in Schools of Philadelphia Inc

Create educational and occupational opportunities for students and adults, launching them towards success in school and in life.

Education
12
Philadelphia Public Access Corporation

Phillycam provides transformative opportunities for people and communities to express themselves, to learn from each other, and to produce and share media reflective of the experiences of everyday people.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philadelphia Youth Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is Catholic Social Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersArts & Cultural Infrastruct…Youth Development ProgramsProfessional Performing Art…Senior Affordable HousingFood Access & DistributionAffordable Housing Develope…University-Affiliated Organ…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%9%<5yr15%9%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr17%13%20–35yr11%18%35–55yr16%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%3%<5yr15%5%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr17%23%20–35yr11%8%35–55yr16%49%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/48
the rest of the field
16%
1,554/9,548

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/44
Grantees still filing
12/44
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $949,358 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVAN…HEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA — $616,974 · EducationHEIGHTS PHILADELPHIASUNRISE OF PHILADELPHIA — $558,766 · EducationSUNRISE OF PHILADELPHIATemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $157,099 · EducationCORA SERVICES INC — $142,941 · EducationTHE NICHE CLINIC — $132,605 · EducationWORKSHOP LEARNING — $120,062 · EducationPHILADELPHIA ACADEMIES INC — $100,784 · Education+4 more — $177,155 · Education+4 moreURBAN AFFAIRS COALITION — $1,176,088 · OtherURBAN AFFAIRS COALITIONEDUCATORS 4 EDUCATION LLC — $371,758 · OtherEDUCATORS 4 EDUCATION LLCEQUITY SOLUTIONS INC — $221,927 · OtherEQUITY SOLUTIONS INCCatholic Social Services — $190,121 · OtherCatholic Social ServicesTHE JOHN BARTRAM ASSOCIATION — $109,154 · OtherBUILDING ON OPPORTUNITY FOR SOUND TRAINING (BOOST CDC) — $103,246 · OtherCOUNCIL OF SPANISH SPEAKING ORGANIZATIONS INC — $93,746 · OtherVESTEDIN — $98,204 · Other+9 more — $306,881 · Other+9 morePHILADELPHIA YOUTH NETWORK INC — $358,427 · Youth DevelopmentPHILADELPHIA YO…Guiding Stars an Anthony C Richardson - Lee Foundation — $252,256 · Youth DevelopmentGuiding Stars a…WE LOVE PHILLY — $142,137 · Youth DevelopmentWE LOVE PHILLYFEDERATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS — $139,238 · Youth DevelopmentFEDERATION OF N…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC — $101,152 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS …THE PHILADELPHIA EDUCATION FUND — $71,641 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PHILADELPHI…ASIAN AMERICANS UNITED INC — $48,698 · Youth DevelopmentGOLD MEDAL KARATE INC — $265,505 · Recreation & SportsGOLD MEDA…SQUASHSMARTS INC — $255,684 · Recreation & SportsSQUASHSMA…HARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION — $136,731 · Recreation & SportsHARLEM LA…PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT THROUGH SOCCER — $41,830 · Recreation & SportsPHILADELP…PHILADELPHIA MURAL ARTS ADVOCATES INC — $152,691 · Arts & CultureROCK TO THE FUTURE INC — $108,985 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR BLACK EDUCATOR DEVELOPMENT — $28,889 · Arts & CultureCONGRESO DE LATINOS UNIDOS INC — $217,739 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $47,320 · HealthCARING PEOPLE ALLIANCE — $115,253 · Crime & LegalBEYOND THE BARS INC — $105,392 · Crime & Legal
Education$2,955,744Other$2,671,125Youth Development$1,113,549Recreation & Sports$699,750Arts & Culture$290,565Health$265,059Crime & Legal$220,645

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetURBAN AFFAIRS COALITION — $1,176,088 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $949,358 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA — $616,974 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetSUNRISE OF PHILADELPHIA — $558,766 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetPHILADELPHIA YOUTH NETWORK INC — $358,427 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetGOLD MEDAL KARATE INC — $265,505 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetSQUASHSMARTS INC — $255,684 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetCONGRESO DE LATINOS UNIDOS INC — $217,739 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCatholic Social Services — $190,121 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $157,099 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MURAL ARTS ADVOCATES INC — $152,691 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCORA SERVICES INC — $142,941 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWE LOVE PHILLY — $142,137 over 1y, 16% of budgetFEDERATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS — $139,238 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION — $136,731 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NICHE CLINIC — $132,605 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetWORKSHOP LEARNING — $120,062 over 1y, 11% of budgetCARING PEOPLE ALLIANCE — $115,253 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE JOHN BARTRAM ASSOCIATION — $109,154 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetROCK TO THE FUTURE INC — $108,985 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetBEYOND THE BARS INC — $105,392 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC — $101,152 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPHILADELPHIA ACADEMIES INC — $100,784 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetVESTEDIN — $98,204 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetCOUNCIL OF SPANISH SPEAKING ORGANIZATIONS INC — $93,746 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBUILDING 21 — $86,990 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBUILD OUR LIVES TOGETHER INC — $85,051 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE PHILADELPHIA EDUCATION FUND — $71,641 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLIGUORI INC — $66,207 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS UNITED INC — $48,698 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $47,320 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF — $47,214 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT THROUGH SOCCER — $41,830 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR BLACK EDUCATOR DEVELOPMENT — $28,889 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES — $20,559 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetINQUIRY SCHOOLS — $8,750 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetSOUTHEAST ASIAN MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATIONS COALITION INC — $8,709 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $7,401 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia Foun…The William Penn Foun…The Barra Foundation …The Patricia Kind Fam…United Way of Greater…Adam and Maria Sarah …Claneil Foundation IncThe Allen Hilles FundHenrietta Tower Wurts…Philanthropy Network …Drexel UniversityHenry Dolfinger 2 Tru…
The Philadelphia FoundationPA59× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · The Barra Foundation Inc · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Adam and Maria Sarah Seybert Institution for Poor Boys and Girls · Claneil Foundation Inc · The Allen Hilles Fund · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial Foundation · Philanthropy Network Greater Philadelphia · Drexel University · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jevs Human Services funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines