How much did Jessie Ball duPont Religious Charitable grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 85% of Jessie Ball duPont Religious Charitable’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

equitydigitalplacemakingjacksonvillecfnf dafnortheastepiscopal church

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 304 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k91 grants · $122k
$10k–50k120 grants · $2.0M
$50k–250k89 grants · $8.4M
$250k+4 grants · $1.4M

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$367M

Total assets

Largest grants

Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida$400,000
City of Jacksonville$366,530
IM Sulzbacher Center for the Homeless Inc$351,125
Local Initiatives Support Corporation (LISC)$250,000
Pioneer Bay Community Development Corporation$230,000
CFNF DAF - 904Ward$202,000
CFNF DAF - LIFT JAX$200,000
We Care Jacksonville$196,160
Placemaking & Equity Fund Inc FBO City of Jacksonville$168,506
The Link$160,000
Boys & Girls Club of the Northern Neck$150,000
CFNF DAF - Downtown Vision Alliance$150,000
Family Foundations of Northeast Florida$150,000
Community Foundation for a greater Richmond$150,000
CareerSource Gulf Coast$150,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $672k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$59M · 118 repeat orgs$5.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

118 repeat relationships — 117 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 60 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

118

Total granted

$59M

$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%

+4%

Still filing today

47%

59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.3M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SB
Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida
2× · 2023–2024 · $832k · revenue +101%
UO
University of the South
2× · 2023–2024 · $441k · revenue +6%
BA
Bay Aging
2× · 2023–2024 · $349k · revenue +277%

Funded once

CF
Center for Structural Equitygraduated
one grant, 2023 · $333k · revenue +225%
PS
Porter-Gaud School
one grant, 2023 · $192k
CC
Community Connections of Jacksonville
one grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue -8% · 100% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Franklin & Marshall College

A residential college dedicated to excellence in undergraduate liberal arts education.

Education

Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education

Union University

Union University provides Christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education

North Carolina State University

Supports, by financial assistance and otherwise, the various colleges within the university, the libraries, and other university-connected functions.

Education

Hampden-Sydney College

Since 1775, the mission of Hampden-Sydney College has been to form good men and good citizens in an atmosphere of sound learning.

Education

Norwich University

Norwich's mission is to give our youth an education that shall be american in its character.

Education

University of Florida

To assist the university of florida in funding of research & development through grants & contractual arrangements & in the commercialization of intellectual properties, which include inventions, discoveries, processes, & work products.

Education

Christopher Newport University

To receive, administer, and distribute funds and property exclusively in furtherance of the educational activities and objectives of christopher newport university.

Education

Wartburg College

Wartburg college provides educational programs and experiences that challenge and nurture students for lives of leadership and service as a spirited expression of their faith and learning.

Education

Sarah Lawrence College

Sarah lawrence college is a four-year liberal arts college (continued on schedule o) offering select graduate programs on its main campus in bronxville, ny and 4 undergraduate global studies programs.

Education

Westminster College

Four-year, undergraduate liberal arts college.

Education

Andrews University

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mary Baldwin University and the most unlike its peers is Museum of Contemporary Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 75 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%2/117

the rest of the field

11%

7,683/72,242

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

104 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

103/104

Grantees still filing

77/104

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$55,640,121Education$2,525,017Health$1,723,557Arts & Culture$1,421,364Philanthropy$1,341,661Human Services$672,167Crime & Legal$563,955

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation ForFL28.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation For · The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · The Community Foundation Inc · National Collegiate Athletic Association · United Way of Northeast Florida Inc · Delaware Community Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Lettie Pate Whitehead Foundation Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · Mayo Clinic Group Return · Ibm International Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Jessie Ball duPont Religious Charitable funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

23get no government money at all

2rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Community Connections of Jacksonville.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 590624472 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Community Connections of Jacksonville, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue held over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Jessie Ball duPont Religious Charitable?

Find your warmest path to Jessie Ball duPont Religious Charitable through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Jessie Ball duPont Religious Charitable

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

104 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Jessie Ball duPont Religious Charitable?

More from the funding graph

Jessie Ball duPont Religious Charitable

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

104 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Jessie Ball duPont Religious Charitable?

More from the funding graph