Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jerstad Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$152k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$54k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$345kReligion$157kHealth$151kHousing & Shelter$124kArts & Culture$123kAnimals$106kHuman Services$87kYouth Development$76kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $54k
$7,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Augustana University$54,000
College Possible$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Opportunity Neighborhood$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Volunteers of America Dakotas$7,000
Prop Shop$7,000
Open Arms of Minnesota$7,000
Mission Animal Hospital$7,000
Lincoln High School$6,500
South Dakota Symphony Orchestra$6,500
Helping Kids Round First$5,500
St Olaf College$5,000
Luthern Theological Seminary$5,000
Washington High School$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%The Bridge for Youth: $10k → 11%The Bridge for Youth: $8k → 11%Open Arms of Minnesota: $7k → 11%Open Arms of Minnesota: $5k → 11%Open Arms of Minnesota: $2k → 11%Community Outreach: $2k → 9%Call to Freedom: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 35 repeat orgs$179k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
30

Total granted

$1.3M
$173k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+9%

Still filing today

51%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AU
    AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $165k · revenue +62%
  • CP
    COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $130k · revenue +79%
  • ON
    OPPORTUNITY NEIGHBORHOOD
    8× · 2017–2024 · $105k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +17%
  • SA
    Suicide Awareness Voices of Education
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +9%
  • SD
    South Dakota Symphony Youth
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
2
The Open Door

The open door is a leading hunger-relief organization serving dakota county, minnesota, where food insecurity is a growing challenge. the open door is dedicated to ending local hunger by providing access to healthy, fresh, and nutritious…

Food & Nutrition
3
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

—
4
Open Your Heart to the Hungry and Homeless

Since 1986, open your heart to the hungry and homeless has worked to ensureevery minnesotan is free from hunger and homelessness. by partnering with organizations serving those in need, we grow donor engagement and raise awareness to…

—
5
Southeastern North Dakota Community Action Agency

Southeastern north dakota community action agency (sendcaa) was formed in 1965 to provide a range of services and activities in a six county area designed to alleviate poverty and give low-income people the opportunity to improve their…

Human Services
6
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
7
Catholic Charities North Dakota

Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.

—
8
South Dakota Voices for Peace

Sd voices for peace provides five programming areas to assist vulnerable communities access services throughout the state: legal services, multilingual outreach, training and education, advocacy and civic engagement and rapid response.

—
9
Minnesota State University Student Association Inc

Led by minnesota state university students, we are the inclusive voice for all future, current, and former students. we actively work to represent and support minnesota state university students and advocate at a campus, state, and federal…

Education
10
Minnesota Council of Nonprofits Inc

The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.

Philanthropy
11
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
12
United Way of Ne Minnesota

United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sanford Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Northside Boxing Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/33
Grantees still filing
24/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARK'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $64,000 · OtherST MARK'S LUTHERAN CHURCHCHRISTIAN AUTO REPAIR SHOP: $52,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN AUTO REPAIR SHOPJDRF: $52,000 · OtherJDRFAvera Family Wellness: $37,500 · OtherAvera Family WellnessVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INC: $27,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherSAVE: $20,000 · OtherWALK-IN COUNSELING CENTER INC: $40,000 · OtherWALK-IN COUNSELING CENTER INC+39 more: $259,570 · Other+39 moreAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $165,000 · EducationAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSO…COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $130,000 · EducationCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC+4 more: $28,000 · Education+4 moreNORTHSIDE BOXING CLUB INC: $56,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHSIDE B…THE PROP SHOP OF EDEN PRAIRIE: $47,500 · PhilanthropyTHE PROP SH…SANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION: $38,500 · PhilanthropySANFORD HEA…SOUTH DAKOTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $69,750 · Arts & CultureWASHINGTON PAVILION MANAGEMENT INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureSuicide Awareness Voices of Education: $15,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL MUSIC MUSEUM (AMERICAS SHRINE TO MUSIC): $4,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $3,000 · Arts & CultureMISSION ANIMAL HOSPITAL: $104,000 · Animals+1 more: $2,000 · AnimalsOPPORTUNITY NEIGHBORHOOD: $105,000 · Housing & ShelterHelping Kids Round First: $66,000 · Recreation & SportsHANDI RIDERS INC: $4,000 · Recreation & SportsSIOUX FALLS SWIM TEAM INC: $4,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$572,070Education$323,000Philanthropy$142,000Arts & Culture$111,750Animals$106,000Housing & Shelter$105,000Recreation & Sports$74,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $165,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $130,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITY NEIGHBORHOOD: $105,000 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetMISSION ANIMAL HOSPITAL: $104,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $69,750 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetHelping Kids Round First: $66,000 over 8y, 6.7% of budgetNORTHSIDE BOXING CLUB INC: $56,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetTHE PROP SHOP OF EDEN PRAIRIE: $47,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetWALK-IN COUNSELING CENTER INC: $40,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetSANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION: $38,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON PAVILION MANAGEMENT INC: $20,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH: $17,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSuicide Awareness Voices of Education: $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetOPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA: $14,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST OLAF COLLEGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BANQUET: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe George Washington University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALL TO FREEDOM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLISION MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNATIONAL MUSIC MUSEUM (AMERICAS SHRINE TO MUSIC): $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHANDI RIDERS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSIOUX FALLS SWIM TEAM INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAvalon Educational Institute: $3,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetMulti-Cultural Center of Sioux Falls: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA NEWS WATCH: $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSIOUX FALLS AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY OUTREACH: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY NEIGHBORHOOD ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ANIMAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds Helping Kids Round First ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSIDE BOXING CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PROP SHOP OF EDEN PRAIRIE ↗
  • Who funds WALK-IN COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON PAVILION MANAGEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds Suicide Awareness Voices of Education ↗
  • Who funds OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds ST OLAF COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE BANQUET ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds BREAD BREAK ↗
  • Who funds MESSIAH NEW HOPE LUTHERAN CHURCH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation IncSD41.8× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc · South Dakota Community Foundation · The Mike Cindy and Kylie Huether Family Foundation · Sanford Group Return · Xcel Energy Foundation · Sheldon F Reese Foundation · Larson Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Robert and Rita Elmen Foundation · Tenfold Foundation Inc · Levo Cares Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jerstad Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jerstad Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jerstad Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jerstad Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jerstad Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph